| Revision as of 22:01, 27 August 2015 editMSJapan (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers20,100 edits →Whitaker rv: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:09, 28 August 2015 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,067 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Nomoskedasticity/Archives) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| * | * | ||
| * }} | * }} | ||
| == Mark Regnerus Article == | |||
| Hello I have made additional comment/suggestion on this article, could you please review and comment? Thanks... ] (]) 00:35, 7 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| You reverted my edit without contributing to the talk page, then advise me to use the talk page. I already explained my view in the talk page so therefore you should go there and talk before reverting. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 18:55, 7 August 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| :Yes, you're right -- just ran out of time earlier. ] (]) 20:30, 7 August 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. == | |||
| ] | |||
| This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the ] regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. | |||
| Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice-->Hi, I am the mediator for a case that you were listed in, please come to this page: Thanks <span>''']'''<sup>''']'''</sup></span> 08:36, 8 August 2015 (UTC) <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| == Susya delete == | == Susya delete == | ||
Revision as of 03:09, 28 August 2015
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Susya delete
You deleted material from Susya while a discussion is taking place on the talk page. Please join it before you delete again. Settleman (talk) 06:51, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Shapps
The source very carefully avoids accusing Shapps of any wrongdoing ... which we ought well follow. The current use makes it quite appear that the living person operated an illegal pyramid scheme. Which is not claimed in the source given. No charges brought, and so no reason to maintain this bit in a BLP IMO. Collect (talk) 23:20, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Collect
Might be wise to back off Collect for a while, he's feeling persecuted and there are lots of eyes on him right now. Just my $0.02. Guy (Help!) 14:33, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Whitaker rv
I'm not going to argue it, but it's a third source used to cite the same sentence, which already has two sources attached to it. I don't see it as supplemental, either - the source consists of the same information (which the writer is summarizing), followed by the writer's opinion piece about "the enablers" (unnamed) needing to be held accountable. There's nothing new or different about it that is of encyclopedic value - it's OVERCITE (and source dumping) to show that quantity of rehashed information in local news = notability. I'd personally rather somebody dealt with the lack of bio in a BLP, and the article creator's reversion of biographical data as "unsourced hagiography" from ASU's website. MSJapan (talk) 22:01, 27 August 2015 (UTC)