Misplaced Pages

Talk:Chicago-style politics (meme): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:56, 6 September 2015 editSpringee (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,467 edits →Notable?← Previous edit Revision as of 18:08, 6 September 2015 edit undoHughD (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,133 edits →Notable?: request conformance with article talk page guidelines from User:SpringeeNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:


Recently questionable edits have been made by HughD to other articles in what appears to be an attempt to make other articles cite this one. That sort of questionable editing does not address the ] issues associated with this article. It is not at all clear that there is any reason to have a stand alone article on one of the many statements made about the Obama campaign and presidency. These questions should be discussed on the talk page. ] (]) 17:56, 6 September 2015 (UTC) Recently questionable edits have been made by HughD to other articles in what appears to be an attempt to make other articles cite this one. That sort of questionable editing does not address the ] issues associated with this article. It is not at all clear that there is any reason to have a stand alone article on one of the many statements made about the Obama campaign and presidency. These questions should be discussed on the talk page. ] (]) 17:56, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
:Please learn to focus on content and depersonalize your comments concerning article content on article talk pages. The appropriate forum for concerns regarding article content is the talk page of the article of concern. Thank you. ] (]) 18:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:08, 6 September 2015

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chicago-style politics (meme) redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
WikiProject iconChicago Redirect‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notable?

Is this topic actually notable enough to exist? Shouldn't this be part of a larger topic talking about political attacks on Obama? Perhaps part of the 2008 and/or 2012 election pages? Springee (talk) 19:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

The notability of this article is in question. Keeping it as a stand alone article is highly questionable. Barring other suggestions, on or around Sept 10th I will post it to WP:AFD. Springee (talk) 17:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Recently questionable edits have been made by HughD to other articles in what appears to be an attempt to make other articles cite this one. That sort of questionable editing does not address the WP:NOTE issues associated with this article. It is not at all clear that there is any reason to have a stand alone article on one of the many statements made about the Obama campaign and presidency. These questions should be discussed on the talk page. Springee (talk) 17:56, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Please learn to focus on content and depersonalize your comments concerning article content on article talk pages. The appropriate forum for concerns regarding article content is the talk page of the article of concern. Thank you. Hugh (talk) 18:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Categories: