| Revision as of 07:17, 7 September 2015 editSlakr (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators33,695 edits →Discretionary sanctions notice - arab-israeli conflict, BLP: new sectionTag: contentious topics alert← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:21, 26 September 2015 edit undoReferenceBot (talk | contribs)48,157 edits Bot: Notice of potential reference breakingNext edit → | ||
| Line 134: | Line 134: | ||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | ||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> --]<small><sup>\ ] /</sup></small> 07:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC) | }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> --]<small><sup>\ ] /</sup></small> 07:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == Reference errors on 25 September == | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have '''automatically detected''' that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. {{#ifeq:1|1|It is|They are}} as follows: | |||
| *On the ] page, caused a ] <small>(])</small>. ( | ) | |||
| Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a ], you can . | |||
| Thanks, <!-- User:ReferenceBot/inform -->] (]) 00:21, 26 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:21, 26 September 2015
Welcome!
|
Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
Hello, Strivingsoul. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Ali Khamenei#Public letter to the Western youths. Thank you.
Houthis
Your recent editing history at Houthis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Bejnar (talk) 17:48, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--Bejnar (talk) 17:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Houthis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tolerance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -Kudzu1 (talk) 03:25, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -Kudzu1 (talk) 16:51, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
April 2015
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 19:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Antisemitism again. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 18:11, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Notification: general sanctions for the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
Please read this notification carefully:
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
- Cwobeel (talk) 19:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Edit Warring at Death to America
Edit Warring
Your recent editing history at Death to America shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - SantiLak (talk) 07:36, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- There was no edit warring, @SantiLak:! We were discussing along the reverts to reach consensus! Strivingsoul (talk) 07:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- You were edit warring at the time, I warned both of you so you would know that you were technically edit warring and so you don't continue to break 3RR, it's a friendly notice as much as the notice seems slightly aggressive. - SantiLak (talk) 07:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- Alright, but what's so bad when those good-faith reverts could help us reach a consensus? Anyway, I take note of that for future disputes. Strivingsoul (talk) 07:51, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
- You were edit warring at the time, I warned both of you so you would know that you were technically edit warring and so you don't continue to break 3RR, it's a friendly notice as much as the notice seems slightly aggressive. - SantiLak (talk) 07:45, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions notice - arab-israeli conflict, BLP
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 --slakr 07:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 --slakr 07:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 25 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Zaidiyyah page, your edit caused a duplicate page number error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 26 September 2015 (UTC)