| Revision as of 12:39, 5 October 2015 editOceanHok (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers39,679 edits →GAMECRUFT: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:51, 5 October 2015 edit undoSoetermans (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers59,792 edits →GAMECRUFT: reNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| It is about GAMECRUFT again, given that you had (again) reverted my edits without explaining why. I removed them not only because they are ], which do not help readers to understand anything, they are unsourced as well, and it is impossible for us to know whether the content there is true or not. Unless you can provide enough adequate ] and arrange them in a presentable way, these information should remain removed. ] (]) 12:39, 5 October 2015 (UTC) | It is about GAMECRUFT again, given that you had (again) reverted my edits without explaining why. I removed them not only because they are ], which do not help readers to understand anything, they are unsourced as well, and it is impossible for us to know whether the content there is true or not. Unless you can provide enough adequate ] and arrange them in a presentable way, these information should remain removed. ] (]) 12:39, 5 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :To chime in, are deemed inappropriate, because they don't say anything substantial about the gameplay. It's just listing things. Compare video game articles like '']'': it explains how the game is played, but doesn't mention all the weapons, or how '']'' functions as a real-time strategy game, without explaing every unit. --]. ] / ] 12:51, 5 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:51, 5 October 2015
Crufty
This is considered WP:GAMECRUFT and would never get included in any article. See WP:VGSCOPE#6 ( Specific point values, achievements and trophies, time-limits, levels (including lists of stadia/sport venues, character moves, character weight classes, unlockable characters, vehicles, and so on are considered inappropriate. Sometimes a concise summary is appropriate if it is essential to understanding the game or its significance in the industry.) and this one is the same. See the same guideline#5 (A concise plot summary is appropriate to cover a notable game, character, or setting. Information beyond that is unnecessary and should be removed, as articles should focus on the real-world elements of a topic, such as creation and reception.) There is a reason why there is a cleanup tag. I am not convinced that a character list is useful, since it barely has any content. Please stop reverting the edits and take a look at the guideline before you call others "crufty". AdrianGamer (talk) 12:57, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
GAMECRUFT
It is about GAMECRUFT again, given that you had (again) reverted my edits without explaining why. I removed them not only because they are WP:GAMECRUFT, which do not help readers to understand anything, they are unsourced as well, and it is impossible for us to know whether the content there is true or not. Unless you can provide enough adequate reliable sources and arrange them in a presentable way, these information should remain removed. AdrianGamer (talk) 12:39, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
- To chime in, long lists like this are deemed inappropriate, because they don't say anything substantial about the gameplay. It's just listing things. Compare video game articles like Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3: it explains how the game is played, but doesn't mention all the weapons, or how Age of Empires II: The Age of Kings functions as a real-time strategy game, without explaing every unit. --Soetermans. T / C 12:51, 5 October 2015 (UTC)