Revision as of 08:21, 9 August 2006 editEmufarmers (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,441 edits →AIV← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:28, 9 August 2006 edit undoAz1568 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,727 edits Re: VandalBotNext edit → | ||
Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
I was under the impression that it's still perfectly acceptable to block a particularly egregious vandal/linkspammer without warning; in this case, it was an IP which had inserted hundreds of gay porn links into an article. --]<sup><small>(]/])</small></sup> 08:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | I was under the impression that it's still perfectly acceptable to block a particularly egregious vandal/linkspammer without warning; in this case, it was an IP which had inserted hundreds of gay porn links into an article. --]<sup><small>(]/])</small></sup> 08:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
:I suppose: Of course, I added that IP to the list about an hour before you removed it. >.< (Not an attack on you; just meaning to say that it was certainly ongoing and blatant at the time when I reported it.) I guess there aren't so many admins on at this hour. --]<sup><small>(]/])</small></sup> 08:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | :I suppose: Of course, I added that IP to the list about an hour before you removed it. >.< (Not an attack on you; just meaning to say that it was certainly ongoing and blatant at the time when I reported it.) I guess there aren't so many admins on at this hour. --]<sup><small>(]/])</small></sup> 08:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
== Re: VandalBot === | |||
Sorry, I forgot to check the block log before reporting.--] 08:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:28, 9 August 2006
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, User_talk:Woohookitty/Archive14, vfd comments
Newuser123
Thanks. He/she was starting in on my page too. *sigh*. SB_Johnny | 11:24, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Tennis vandal
Thank you. I appreciate your help. Igorrr 12:06, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
My Talk Page
Unprotect my talk page. 75.3.11.87 15:07, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Now that I can edit again, I will no longer need to use my page for personal attacks, I will make the personal attacks on the talk pages of the people I choose to attack. 75.3.11.87 03:04, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
just kidding. 75.3.11.87 03:04, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
You forget to block?
You forgot?--Andeh 16:26, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- Can't see the point really, seeing as he is acting as a persistent vandal on their first edit.--Andeh 16:31, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Nitcentral article
Hi. There is a motion afoot to delete the article on Phil Farrand's website, Nitcentral, as you can see here. If you have an opinion on it, can you chime in? Thanks. Nightscream 17:21, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Stub removal
Hi. We are both members of the Stub sensor stub removal project. I dont know when there will be more stubs to remove through the project, but if you are interested, there is a newer project here: User:Eagle 101/Big Stubs/List. SynergeticMaggot 07:31, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Yep, i'm still here.. just busy at the moment.
Hello there Micheal. Yep, i'm still here abouts, just currently working on a big project for a major retailer, which i've managed to get dragged into by one of my ex business partners. Hopefully i'll be back to wiki-editing in a while, and hopefully adding quite a lot of info to a lot of medical articles; I've added a few bits of info here and there, and corrected some inaccuracies in those articles, but i've been too busy to do anything like i was doing in the old days. :-) Regards to you! Meow indeed! The magical Spum-dandy 17:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
Mywayyy reports on AIV
Hi, thanks for your note regarding my "Mywayyy" abuse reports. I know it's not a classic case of WP:AIV, but using AIV for the purpose has worked fairly well in the past. What makes it less suitable for WP:ANI, in my view, is its short-term and routine nature. We've typically been getting two or three fresh IP attacks from that banned user per day, and I think it would strain people's patience to have all these alerts on ANI. I don't really know what else to do. What do you think? The guy is extremely stubborn and has explicitly stated his intention of continuing his reverts forever until he wears down his opponents' patience. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:33, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- P.S. Thanks for the pointer. How would the "Long term abuse" page work for attracting short-term admin attention? Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:45, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Bahnstah
The Working Man's Barnstar | ||
Since my first contact with you, I've been very impressed by the way you handle yourself. I don't know when you got your last star, but a quick glance at your talk archives implies: too long. Your hard, tireless work, keeping content disputes under control, mitigating vandalism, with the Cleanup Taskforce, and in general keeping Misplaced Pages running, clearly qualify you for the Working Man's Barnstar. Luna Santin 12:18, 7 August 2006 (UTC) |
Halle Berry
Just to let you know, the second that article is unlocked, I'm reverting it right back to where it needs to be. Have fun in your whitewashed world. I'll see you soon.
PS: Since you seem to have fallen off the short bus om your head, there's a HUUUUUUGE difference between telling someone to die and telling someone that you're going to kill them. In the future, try a little less admin badge polishing and a little bit more reading. MThompson 12:20, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Mywayyy
Hi there! This is the banned-thanks to Future Perfect at Sunrise user Mywayyy. I would like to explain a few things. First of all I have nothing against FPS, even though, he has treated me unfairly. He should strongly consider removing that PERFECT from his name. Anyway the thing is that there are some articles regarding Greek islands and other cities that this guy constantly keeps adding Turkish names. This is totally unacceptable for two reasons: First there is absolutely no reason for adding those names. There is neither Turkish population or any cultural significance to justify such a thing. For Xanthi article for instance, where there is a Muslim minority i havent changed anything because it is right to have a Turkish name there. The second reason is more serious: This user does not show the same stance when Greek names are removed from Turkish articles. He only cares how to add Turkish names to Greek articles. I have tried to speak to him but he believes he is the god of Misplaced Pages and can just solve things by accusing me of vandalism. When HE reverts why isnt HE beiing accused of vandalism and its just me?? I dont think that a content dispute should be dealt as vandalism. Then most of Wikipedians would be like the biggest vandals.Regards! Mywayyy88.218.47.184 12:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Bothering
Because your cute and cuddlywuddly and we won't let you go! Besides, you'd feel guilty if you ever went away. In any case, PennyGWoods and company have been checkusered to death, the Singapore IPs all blocked for a week, and the latest reincarnation was on an open proxy, now blocked. Cross your fingers... Dmcdevit·t 03:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
More Kosovo weirdness
We've had some disruption on Kosovo, Kosovo Liberation Army and Template:Kosovo-InfoBox from an anonymous user who's been using multiple proxy servers to make highly contentious edits and personal attacks against me. It would appear that the person responsible is the operator of the Tonycdp account. I'd be grateful if you could check my reasoning on User talk:ChrisO/Tonycdp and let me know what you think. If I'm right, the user in question has clearly been acting dishonestly and disruptively; the question is, what should we do about it? -- ChrisO 18:58, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Don't worry, it's been dealt with now. :-)
I promise
I promise not to make any personal attacks on my talk page. 75.3.11.87 00:09, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
AIV
I was under the impression that it's still perfectly acceptable to block a particularly egregious vandal/linkspammer without warning; in this case, it was an IP which had inserted hundreds of gay porn links into an article. --Emufarmers 08:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- I suppose: Of course, I added that IP to the list about an hour before you removed it. >.< (Not an attack on you; just meaning to say that it was certainly ongoing and blatant at the time when I reported it.) I guess there aren't so many admins on at this hour. --Emufarmers 08:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Re: VandalBot =
Sorry, I forgot to check the block log before reporting.--1568 08:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)