| Revision as of 20:27, 9 August 2006 editIsotope23 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,870 edits →[]: Comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:52, 9 August 2006 edit undoFan-1967 (talk | contribs)21,751 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| *'''Comment''' - I am curious as to why the <nowiki>{{afdnewbies}}</nowiki> tag was added to this AfD. - ] (] - ]) 19:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' - I am curious as to why the <nowiki>{{afdnewbies}}</nowiki> tag was added to this AfD. - ] (] - ]) 19:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :That's been bugging me as well, especially since it was added before a single comment was made. ] 19:44, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | :That's been bugging me as well, especially since it was added before a single comment was made. ] 19:44, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::That does seem odd. The only time I'd ever consider adding the tag right off the bat is when nominating an article on a forum, since we know the socks always show up on those. ] 22:52, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Comment''' Just as a note, though it has never been codified in ], there are quite a few police commissioner articles in Misplaced Pages, and one could probably make a very strong case for systemic bias if this were deleted. I cannot vote keep as this is article has ''no'' sourcing, thus fails ] (and I've tagged it as such and ]. I imagine this could probably be sourced rather easily... but should be deleted if it is not.--] 20:27, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' Just as a note, though it has never been codified in ], there are quite a few police commissioner articles in Misplaced Pages, and one could probably make a very strong case for systemic bias if this were deleted. I cannot vote keep as this is article has ''no'' sourcing, thus fails ] (and I've tagged it as such and ]. I imagine this could probably be sourced rather easily... but should be deleted if it is not.--] 20:27, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:52, 9 August 2006
 | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Misplaced Pages contributors. Misplaced Pages has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}. |
K. R. Kaushik
Subject non notable. Is a Bureaucrat and not a politician with no significant achievement Doctor Bruno 19:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep - The subject of the artcle (police commissioner of Ahmedabad) meets requirements of WP:BIO - Major local political figures who receive (or received) significant press coverage. A google search on K R Kaushik + Ahmedabad will give you hundreds of hits from most of the newspapers of India. - Aksi_great (talk - review me) 19:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- No vote yet A police commissioner in a city of 5 million people probably gets lots of press. Does anyone care to research this and flesh it out into a full article? Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - The article has a lot of scope for expansion like all other articles at Category:Ahmedabad. I am the creator of these articles and maintain most of them. But currently I am busy with Ahmedabad and its FAC which was the reason why these articles were created. - Aksi_great (talk - review me) 19:37, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Chief of Police in a large city is a notable person. Article is a stub, but that's not a criterion for deletion. It's a criterion for expansion. Bureacrat/Politician is a fine line, and regardless of how much nothing they accomplish, Goveners General are all notable, for example. WilyD 19:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - I am curious as to why the {{afdnewbies}} tag was added to this AfD. - Aksi_great (talk - review me) 19:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- That's been bugging me as well, especially since it was added before a single comment was made. WilyD 19:44, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- That does seem odd. The only time I'd ever consider adding the tag right off the bat is when nominating an article on a forum, since we know the socks always show up on those. Fan-1967 22:52, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Just as a note, though it has never been codified in WP:BIO, there are quite a few police commissioner articles in Misplaced Pages, and one could probably make a very strong case for systemic bias if this were deleted. I cannot vote keep as this is article has no sourcing, thus fails WP:V (and I've tagged it as such and WP:BIO. I imagine this could probably be sourced rather easily... but should be deleted if it is not.--Isotope23 20:27, 9 August 2006 (UTC)