| Revision as of 23:42, 9 August 2006 editRMHED (talk | contribs)15,716 edits →[]: added comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:25, 10 August 2006 edit undoUncle G (talk | contribs)Administrators52,482 edits Removed notice where there is no evidence of, or likelyhood of, drive-by comments.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{afdnewbies}} | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| Subject non notable. Is a Bureaucrat and not a politician with no significant achievement ] 19:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | Subject non notable. Is a Bureaucrat and not a politician with no significant achievement ] 19:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Strong keep''' - The subject of the artcle (police commissioner of Ahmedabad) meets requirements of ] - Major local political figures who receive (or received) significant press coverage. A google search on K R Kaushik + Ahmedabad will give you hundreds of hits from most of the newspapers of India. - ] (] - ]) 19:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | *'''Strong keep''' - The subject of the artcle (police commissioner of Ahmedabad) meets requirements of ] - Major local political figures who receive (or received) significant press coverage. A google search on K R Kaushik + Ahmedabad will give you hundreds of hits from most of the newspapers of India. - ] (] - ]) 19:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''No vote yet''' A police commissioner in a city of 5 million people probably gets lots of press. Does anyone care to research this and flesh it out into a full article? ] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 19:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | *'''No vote yet''' A police commissioner in a city of 5 million people probably gets lots of press. Does anyone care to research this and flesh it out into a full article? ] - <b><FONT COLOR="#FF0000">St</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF5500">ar</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FF8000">bli</FONT><FONT COLOR="#FFC000">nd</FONT></b> 19:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| **'''Comment''' - The article has a lot of scope for expansion like all other articles at ]. I am the creator of these articles and maintain most of them. But currently I am busy with ] and its FAC which was the reason why these articles were created. - ] (] - ]) 19:37, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Keep''' Chief of Police in a large city is a notable person. Article is a stub, but that's not a criterion for deletion. It's a criterion for expansion. Bureacrat/Politician is a fine line, and regardless of how much nothing they accomplish, Goveners General are all notable, for example. ] 19:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' Chief of Police in a large city is a notable person. Article is a stub, but that's not a criterion for deletion. It's a criterion for expansion. Bureacrat/Politician is a fine line, and regardless of how much nothing they accomplish, Goveners General are all notable, for example. ] 19:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment''' - I am curious as to why the <nowiki>{{afdnewbies}}</nowiki> tag was added to this AfD. - ] (] - ]) 19:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' - I am curious as to why the <nowiki>{{afdnewbies}}</nowiki> tag was added to this AfD. - ] (] - ]) 19:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| **That's been bugging me as well, especially since it was added before a single comment was made. ] 19:44, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ***That does seem odd. The only time I'd ever consider adding the tag right off the bat is when nominating an article on a forum, since we know the socks always show up on those. ] 22:52, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Comment''' Just as a note, though it has never been codified in ], there are quite a few police commissioner articles in Misplaced Pages, and one could probably make a very strong case for systemic bias if this were deleted. I cannot vote keep as this is article has ''no'' sourcing, thus fails ] (and I've tagged it as such and ]. I imagine this could probably be sourced rather easily... but should be deleted if it is not.--] 20:27, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' Just as a note, though it has never been codified in ], there are quite a few police commissioner articles in Misplaced Pages, and one could probably make a very strong case for systemic bias if this were deleted. I cannot vote keep as this is article has ''no'' sourcing, thus fails ] (and I've tagged it as such and ]. I imagine this could probably be sourced rather easily... but should be deleted if it is not.--] 20:27, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' I've added a reference and dob --] 23:42, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' I've added a reference and dob --] 23:42, 9 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:25, 10 August 2006
K. R. Kaushik
Subject non notable. Is a Bureaucrat and not a politician with no significant achievement Doctor Bruno 19:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep - The subject of the artcle (police commissioner of Ahmedabad) meets requirements of WP:BIO - Major local political figures who receive (or received) significant press coverage. A google search on K R Kaushik + Ahmedabad will give you hundreds of hits from most of the newspapers of India. - Aksi_great (talk - review me) 19:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- No vote yet A police commissioner in a city of 5 million people probably gets lots of press. Does anyone care to research this and flesh it out into a full article? Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - The article has a lot of scope for expansion like all other articles at Category:Ahmedabad. I am the creator of these articles and maintain most of them. But currently I am busy with Ahmedabad and its FAC which was the reason why these articles were created. - Aksi_great (talk - review me) 19:37, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Chief of Police in a large city is a notable person. Article is a stub, but that's not a criterion for deletion. It's a criterion for expansion. Bureacrat/Politician is a fine line, and regardless of how much nothing they accomplish, Goveners General are all notable, for example. WilyD 19:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - I am curious as to why the {{afdnewbies}} tag was added to this AfD. - Aksi_great (talk - review me) 19:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- That's been bugging me as well, especially since it was added before a single comment was made. WilyD 19:44, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- That does seem odd. The only time I'd ever consider adding the tag right off the bat is when nominating an article on a forum, since we know the socks always show up on those. Fan-1967 22:52, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- That's been bugging me as well, especially since it was added before a single comment was made. WilyD 19:44, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Just as a note, though it has never been codified in WP:BIO, there are quite a few police commissioner articles in Misplaced Pages, and one could probably make a very strong case for systemic bias if this were deleted. I cannot vote keep as this is article has no sourcing, thus fails WP:V (and I've tagged it as such and WP:BIO. I imagine this could probably be sourced rather easily... but should be deleted if it is not.--Isotope23 20:27, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep I've added a reference and dob --RMHED 23:42, 9 August 2006 (UTC)