Misplaced Pages

User talk:BoyTheKingCanDance: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:02, 27 October 2015 editBoyTheKingCanDance (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers173,246 edits Category← Previous edit Revision as of 09:08, 27 October 2015 edit undoBoyTheKingCanDance (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers173,246 edits cleaning upNext edit →
Line 6: Line 6:


:: Dear ], I hope you are well. Sorry, but you are wrong. See ]. It states: "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." So the onus is YOU to provide the source. Regards, ] (]) 06:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC) :: Dear ], I hope you are well. Sorry, but you are wrong. See ]. It states: "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." So the onus is YOU to provide the source. Regards, ] (]) 06:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

== Category ==

Please stop with the reverts, they're not helpful. The category exists at ]. It's best to wait first rather than reverting on the minute. ''']''' (]) 08:59, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
:: ] See the comment on your page. And don't preach that something's unhelpful when you are doing things in the wrong order. ] (]) 09:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:08, 27 October 2015

Greetings GorgeCustersSabre! You undid my changes on the article Badr al-Jamali. If you find the information wrong, change it, and mention a source. If you find it to be corrent, help the article with a source. Please don't delete anything without a reason. As you might realize, I spend quite some time to get this information and it takes quite long for me to edit. Additionally, the abscence of a citation is not reason enough for complete deletion.

Thanks! DistributorScientiae (talk) 13:18, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Dear DistributorScientiae, I hope you are well. Sorry, but you are wrong. See WP:BURDEN. It states: "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." So the onus is YOU to provide the source. Regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 06:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)