| Revision as of 21:18, 30 October 2015 editAnticyclone à banias (talk | contribs)30 edits →Reported for edit-warring← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:20, 30 October 2015 edit undoAnticyclone à banias (talk | contribs)30 edits Closed discussionNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | ||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->--] (]) 13:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC) | }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->--] (]) 13:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC) | ||
| === Reported for edit-warring === | |||
| I have reported your account ] for edit-warring on ]. <span style="font-family: Papyrus">] (])</span> 21:43, 29 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| It is easy to be provactive. The bot was a false positive, because I deleted the flag. But the second edit I left the flag. I think you shoud refrain from reverting without a reason. | |||
| --] (]) 23:18, 29 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::This has nothing to do with flags. You are repeatedly inserting an assertion that Gaza is not a part of the ]. This is a highly contentious edit, and even if you can produce ] which make this assertion you should seek consensus on the talk page first. And you should certainly not edit war to include such a claim. <span style="font-family: Papyrus">] (])</span> 11:30, 30 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Anticyclone, you technically broke the 1RR rule at ]. I am prepared to close the AE complaint. To avoid a block you should promise to stop reverting and wait for consensus. Anything to do with the state of Palestine is going to be controversial. Thank you, ] (]) 02:30, 30 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::Ok, I believe your reaction was disproportionate. "Administred by Hamas and claimed by the State of Palestine" to describe the Gaza strip is factualy true. I can show up fews documents if you find it is necessary. I think accusing me of "POV warring" is contentious in this type of situation. I personally did not find anywhere that reverting this bot was part of the 1RR "rule". | |||
| NB: Don't you think that, being opposed to the "right" of (the Jewish) people to self determination is unusual for people who fought against racism and indentify themselves as part of that group. | |||
| Good day | |||
| --] (]) 15:20, 30 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :Anticyclone, if you want to accept my offer you need to promise to wait for consensus before changing the ] article again. Otherwise a block may be issued. ] (]) 15:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::I implicitly accepted your judgment/offer/proposal. Though, I am not in a position to swear to respect an inexistant Misplaced Pages Constitution and laws. Hereby, I assume good faith, as I never assumed the opposite so far. {{quote| A bad faith edit, or a bad faith comment, is an edit or comment made deliberately to disrupt the project. The best example of genuine bad faith is vandalism. While bad faith is not strictly limited to vandalism, the key component of bad faith is the deliberate attempt to be unconstructive.}}. That's all I can do for now, Good day. --] (]) 15:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::@] | |||
| :::@] | |||
| :::CU's on wp:fr identified ] as a sock of a banned user | |||
| :::He is as provocative there than here and ] there and here ] (]) 17:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I followed the above link to the CU finding on the French Misplaced Pages, but it appears that the result was 'Négatif'. None of the reported accounts have been blocked. ] (]) 19:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::@] | |||
| :::::No, no... The result is positive at 90 % but things move forward slowly on wp:fr. | |||
| :::::I'll inform you of the evolution ] (]) 20:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::No this page is my talk page, please go talk about blocking me elsewhere. | |||
| --] (]) 21:18, 30 October 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:20, 30 October 2015
October 2015
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gaza Strip has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gaza Strip was changed by Anticyclone à banias (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859522 on 2015-10-29T04:57:24+00:00 2410917.
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:57, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
WP:ARBPIA alert
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.