Revision as of 01:39, 12 August 2006 editKehrli (talk | contribs)834 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:01, 12 August 2006 edit undoKehrli (talk | contribs)834 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
There are many physical constants in science, some of the most famous being ] ''ħ'', the ] ''G'', the ] ''c'', the ] ε<sub>0</sub>, and the ] ''e''. Constants can take many forms: the speed of light in a vacuum signifies a maximum speed limit of the ]; while the ] α, which characterizes the interaction between ]s and ]s, is ]. | There are many physical constants in science, some of the most famous being ] ''ħ'', the ] ''G'', the ] ''c'', the ] ε<sub>0</sub>, and the ] ''e''. Constants can take many forms: the speed of light in a vacuum signifies a maximum speed limit of the ]; while the ] α, which characterizes the interaction between ]s and ]s, is ]. | ||
]s, are basic properties of nature, not merely human constructs. All examples above are considered fundamental physical constants, whereas the length of the Eiffel tower or the earths acceleration constant g are not fundamental. | |||
Beginning with ] in ], some scientists have speculated that physical constants may actually decrease in proportion to the age of the universe. Scientific experiments have not yet pinpointed any definite evidence that this is the case, although they have placed upper bounds on the maximum possible relative change per year at very small amounts (roughly 10<sup>-5</sup> per year for the fine structure constant α and 10<sup>-11</sup> for the gravitational constant ''G''). It is currently disputed that any changes in ''dimensionful'' physical constants such as ''G'', ''c'', ''ħ'', or ε<sub>0</sub> are operationally meaningless; however, a change in a dimensionless constant such as α is something that would definitely be noticed. If a measurement indicated that a dimensionful physical constant had changed, this would be the result or ''interpretation'' of a more fundamental dimensionless constant changing, which is the salient metric. | Beginning with ] in ], some scientists have speculated that physical constants may actually decrease in proportion to the age of the universe. Scientific experiments have not yet pinpointed any definite evidence that this is the case, although they have placed upper bounds on the maximum possible relative change per year at very small amounts (roughly 10<sup>-5</sup> per year for the fine structure constant α and 10<sup>-11</sup> for the gravitational constant ''G''). It is currently disputed that any changes in ''dimensionful'' physical constants such as ''G'', ''c'', ''ħ'', or ε<sub>0</sub> are operationally meaningless; however, a change in a dimensionless constant such as α is something that would definitely be noticed. If a measurement indicated that a dimensionful physical constant had changed, this would be the result or ''interpretation'' of a more fundamental dimensionless constant changing, which is the salient metric. | ||
Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
While some properties of materials and particles are constant, they do not show up on this page because they are specific to their respective materials or properties alone. | While some properties of materials and particles are constant, they do not show up on this page because they are specific to their respective materials or properties alone. | ||
Contrary to wide belief, physiscal constants do not depend on systems of units. | |||
Constants that are independent of systems of units are typically ]s, known as ]s, and '''are''' truly meaningful parameters of nature, not merely human constructs. The ] α is probably the most well-known dimensionless fundamental physical constant. The dimensionless ratios of masses (or other like-dimensioned properties) of ] are also fundamental physical constants, as are the measure of these properties in terms of natural units. | |||
Some people claim that if the physical constants had slightly different values, our universe would be so radically different that intelligent life would probably not have emerged, and that our universe therefore seems to be ] for intelligent life. The weak ] simply states that it's only because these fundamental constants acquired their respective values that there was sufficient order and richness in elemental diversity for life to have formed, which subsequently evolved the necessary intelligence toward observing that these constants have taken on the values they have. | Some people claim that if the physical constants had slightly different values, our universe would be so radically different that intelligent life would probably not have emerged, and that our universe therefore seems to be ] for intelligent life. The weak ] simply states that it's only because these fundamental constants acquired their respective values that there was sufficient order and richness in elemental diversity for life to have formed, which subsequently evolved the necessary intelligence toward observing that these constants have taken on the values they have. |
Revision as of 02:01, 12 August 2006
In science, a physical constant is a physical quantity whose value does not change. It can be contrasted with a mathematical constant, which is a fixed value that does not directly involve a physical measurement.
There are many physical constants in science, some of the most famous being the reduced Planck constant ħ, the gravitational constant G, the speed of light c, the electric constant ε0, and the elementary charge e. Constants can take many forms: the speed of light in a vacuum signifies a maximum speed limit of the universe; while the fine-structure constant α, which characterizes the interaction between electrons and photons, is dimensionless.
Fundamental physical constants, are basic properties of nature, not merely human constructs. All examples above are considered fundamental physical constants, whereas the length of the Eiffel tower or the earths acceleration constant g are not fundamental.
Beginning with Paul Dirac in 1937, some scientists have speculated that physical constants may actually decrease in proportion to the age of the universe. Scientific experiments have not yet pinpointed any definite evidence that this is the case, although they have placed upper bounds on the maximum possible relative change per year at very small amounts (roughly 10 per year for the fine structure constant α and 10 for the gravitational constant G). It is currently disputed that any changes in dimensionful physical constants such as G, c, ħ, or ε0 are operationally meaningless; however, a change in a dimensionless constant such as α is something that would definitely be noticed. If a measurement indicated that a dimensionful physical constant had changed, this would be the result or interpretation of a more fundamental dimensionless constant changing, which is the salient metric.
While some properties of materials and particles are constant, they do not show up on this page because they are specific to their respective materials or properties alone.
Contrary to wide belief, physiscal constants do not depend on systems of units.
Some people claim that if the physical constants had slightly different values, our universe would be so radically different that intelligent life would probably not have emerged, and that our universe therefore seems to be fine-tuned for intelligent life. The weak anthropic principle simply states that it's only because these fundamental constants acquired their respective values that there was sufficient order and richness in elemental diversity for life to have formed, which subsequently evolved the necessary intelligence toward observing that these constants have taken on the values they have.
Table of universal constants
Quantity | Symbol | Value | Relative Standard Uncertainty |
---|---|---|---|
characteristic impedance of vacuum | 376.730 313 461... Ω | defined | |
electric constant (permittivity of free space) | 8.854 187 817... × 10F·m | defined | |
magnetic constant (permeability of free space) | 4π × 10 N·A = 1.2566 370 614... × 10 N·A | defined | |
Newtonian constant of gravitation | 6.6742(10) × 10m·kg·s | 1.5 × 10 | |
Planck's constant | 6.626 0693(11) × 10 J·s | 1.7 × 10 | |
Dirac's constant | 1.054 571 68(18) × 10 J·s | 1.7 × 10 | |
speed of light in vacuum | 299 792 458 m·s | defined |
Table of electromagnetic constants
Quantity | Symbol | Value (SI units) | Relative Standard Uncertainty |
---|---|---|---|
Bohr magneton | 927.400 949(80) × 10 J·T | 8.6 × 10 | |
conductance quantum | 7.748 091 733(26) × 10 S | 3.3 × 10 | |
Coulomb's constant | 8.987 742 438 × 10 N·mC | defined | |
elementary charge | 1.602 176 53(14) × 10 C | 8.5 × 10 | |
Josephson constant | 483 597.879(41) × 10 Hz· V | 8.5 × 10 | |
magnetic flux quantum | 2.067 833 72(18) × 10 Wb | 8.5 × 10 | |
nuclear magneton | 5.050 783 43(43) × 10 J·T | 8.6 × 10 | |
resistance quantum | 12 906.403 725(43) Ω | 3.3 × 10 | |
von Klitzing constant | 25 812.807 449(86) Ω | 3.3 × 10 |
Table of atomic and nuclear constants
Quantity | Symbol | Value (SI units) | Relative Standard Uncertainty | |
Bohr radius | 0.529 177 2108(18) × 10 m | 3.3 × 10 | ||
Fermi coupling constant | 1.166 39(1) × 10 GeV | 8.6 × 10 | ||
fine-structure constant | 7.297 352 568(24) × 10 | 3.3 × 10 | ||
Hartree energy | 4.359 744 17(75) × 10 J | 1.7 × 10 | ||
quantum of circulation | 3.636 947 550(24) × 10 m s | 6.7 × 10 | ||
Rydberg constant | 10 973 731.568 525(73) m | 6.6 × 10 | ||
Thomson cross section | 0.665 245 873(13) × 10 m | 2.0 × 10 | ||
weak mixing angle | 0.222 15(76) | 3.4 × 10 |
Table of physico-chemical constants
Quantity | Symbol | Value (SI units) | Relative Standard Uncertainty | |
atomic mass constant (unified atomic mass unit) | 1.660 538 86(28) × 10 kg | 1.7 × 10 | ||
Avogadro's number | 6.022 1415(10) × 10 | 1.7 × 10 | ||
Boltzmann constant | 1.380 6505(24) × 10 J·K | 1.8 × 10 | ||
Faraday constant | 96 485.3383(83)C·mol | 8.6 × 10 | ||
first radiation constant | 3.741 771 38(64) × 10 W·m | 1.7 × 10 | ||
for spectral radiance | 1.191 042 82(20) × 10 W · m sr | 1.7 × 10 | ||
Loschmidt constant | at =273.15 K and =101.325 kPa | 2.686 7773(47) × 10 m | 1.8 × 10 | |
gas constant | 8.314 472(15) J·K·mol | 1.7 × 10 | ||
molar Planck constant | 3.990 312 716(27) × 10 J · s · mol | 6.7 × 10 | ||
molar volume of an ideal gas | at =273.15 K and =100 kPa | 22.710 981(40) × 10 m ·mol | 1.7 × 10 | |
at =273.15 K and =101.325 kPa | 22.413 996(39) × 10 m ·mol | 1.7 × 10 | ||
Sackur-Tetrode constant | at =1 K and =100 kPa | |
-1.151 7047(44) | 3.8 × 10 |
at =1 K and =101.325 kPa | -1.164 8677(44) | 3.8 × 10 | ||
second radiation constant | 1.438 7752(25) × 10 m·K | 1.7 × 10 | ||
Stefan-Boltzmann constant | 5.670 400(40) × 10 W·m·K | 7.0 × 10 | ||
Wien displacement law constant | 4.965 114 231... | 2.897 7685(51) × 10 m · K | 1.7 × 10 |
Table of adopted values
Quantity | Symbol | Value (SI units) | Relative Standard Uncertainty | |
conventional value of Josephson constant | 483 597.9 × 10 Hz · V | defined | ||
conventional value of von Klitzing constant | 25 812.807 Ω | defined | ||
molar mass | constant | 1 × 10 kg · mol | defined | |
of carbon-12 | 12 × 10 kg · mol | defined | ||
standard acceleration of gravity (gee, free fall on Earth) | 9.806 65 m·s | defined | ||
standard atmosphere | 101 325 Pa | defined |
Notes
The values are given in the so-called concise form; the number in brackets is the standard uncertainty, which is the value multiplied by the relative standard uncertainty.
This is the value adopted internationally for realizing representations of the volt using the Josephson effect.
This is the value adopted internationally for realizing representations of the ohm using the quantum Hall effect.
See also
- Astronomical constant
- Scientific constants named after people
- Fine-tuned universe
- Physical law
- CODATA
- atomic units
- Planck units
Further reading
- John D. Barrow, 2002. The Constants of Nature. Pantheon Books.
References
- CODATA Recommendations - 2002 CODATA Internationally recommended values of the Fundamental Physical Constants