| Revision as of 00:30, 1 November 2015 editMadmanBot (talk | contribs)67,844 edits →Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:30, 25 November 2015 edit undoMadmanBot (talk | contribs)67,844 edits →Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivityNext edit → | ||
| Line 133: | Line 133: | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->] (]) 00:30, 1 November 2015 (UTC) | Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->] (]) 00:30, 1 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
| ==Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== | |||
| ] | |||
| Following a ] in June 2011, consensus was reached to ] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the ] and the userright will be restored per the ] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at ]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->] (]) 00:30, 25 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:30, 25 November 2015
| ||||||
| Reply policy: Unless there is a special need, I would reply in your talk page. |
| |||||
 | Gallileo2k is taking a long wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages some time later. |
Thanks
Ragib, thanks for your help at what is now 2013 Dhaka protests. I hadn't checked out the Asian Human Rights Commission report in any detail but I agree that citing somebody who's citing "internet reports" is dodgy. My main concern at that point was removing the completely ridiculous stuff from the article. I kept the 2,500 figure mostly so that people wouldn't complain of bias from just quoting the BBC source. Somebody else has put the link to AHRC back into the article and, while I removed their text, I left the link: I figure people are just going to keep adding it so maybe if it's already there with no comment, they'll be happy. (I've put your talk page on my watchlist so easiest to reply here, I think, and keep our discussion in one place.) Dricherby (talk) 20:45, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
List of Zilla Schools of Bangladesh
I am looking for someone who has knowledge on the topic. You have worked on Bangladesh related topics. Probably you can help. Solomon7968 (talk) 13:46, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- What do you want to know about this topic @User:Solomon7968? --Ragib (talk) 21:39, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
I was thinking of a chronological list of all schools in Bengal. It is good to then start from the zilla schools because they are the first schools. Well I am also interested in Politics of Bangladesh and Politics of West Bengal and we could not get citations for some Very important topics. May be you could help. Solomon7968 (talk) 21:43, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Solomon7968, you can find the chronology by checking Banglapedia. Just google with the school's name and the keyword Banglapedia, you'll get a page on the school. For example Rangpur Zilla School is here.
- Some schools are old but not Zilla schools. For example Pogose School in Dhaka, the Collegiate Schools (e.g. Chittagong Collegiate School. --Ragib (talk) 21:50, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
The article previously had a facebook link. I removed it as per guidelines though it lists 16 zilla schools. Ok but I could not find any sources for a biogaphy. Can you help. Read the link and please let me know if you have any info. Solomon7968 (talk) 22:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Shahbag Square for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shahbag Square is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Shahbag Square until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:30, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
FYI
FYI: Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#2013_Bangladesh_India_WikiProjects_dispute_resolution.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:25, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- Special welcome. I was searching you and was going to mail you. There are some more informal (:-P) messages at User_talk:Sitush#2013_WikiProject_India_dispute_resolution --Tito Dutta (contact) 17:52, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your suggestion in the Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#2013_Bangladesh_India_WikiProjects_dispute_resolution. As per your suggestion, a person can be described as X is/was a Bangladeshi Y if he/she lives/lived in Bangladesh with a Bangladeshi citizenship, even though he/she might have been born in British India (pre-1947) or East Pakistan (1947-71). By this logic Chandravati cannot be describe as Chandravati was a Bangladeshi poet, because she never lived in Bangladesh with Bangladeshi citizenship. Hence Category:Bangladeshi poets is not applicable for Chandravati. Same logic would apply for Michael Madhusudan Dutt and Nabin Chandra Sen. Please confirm if my understanding of your suggestion is correct. BengaliHindu (talk) 05:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Re: List of Bengali films 1931—2013
Message added by Tito Dutta (contact) 03:32, 25 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time.
Persecution of Biharis in Bangladesh
Please take a look at the article, contains massive POV contents. --Zayeem 15:41, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
2013 Motijheel shootings
- Please have a look at 2013 Motijheel shootings. It is full of pov claims ,comments and poor sources
রাহাত | ✉ 16:07, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Unprotection requests
There are some unprotection requests related to pages you previously protected here Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 00:20, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Need your participation
Please take a look at the discussion here. Thanks. --Zayeem 18:57, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Bangladesh symbols
Somehow National symbols of Bangladesh are deleted, including the national emblem etc. see: https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:National_emblem_of_Bangladesh.svg I think these files need to be restored. As far as I remember, these SVG files were user contributed, not scrapped from government resources. Also, if I remember, copyvio is exempted in such cases. --» nafSadh did say 01:53, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Page protection
Hi Ragib, I've downgraded your indef semi of Matiur Rahman (military pilot) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) to pending changes for one year per a request at WP:RFUP. Feel free to change my admin action, you have my consent as far as WP:WHEEL does. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:07, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Dinesh Gupta 1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Dinesh Gupta 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Misplaced Pages. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:11, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Better source request for File:Badal gupta.jpg
Thanks for your upload to Misplaced Pages:
You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:16, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Badal gupta.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:34, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Bangladesh
Hi, Ragib! I want to thank you for your decision to protect List of Presidents of Bangladesh. That article was a target for vandalism and adding of incorrect data for quite some time... I think some other articles, like Bangladeshi Declaration of Independence, President of Bangladesh and Ziaur Rahman should also be protected, they also were targets for various vandalism. Cheers! --Sundostund (talk) 12:41, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Can you?
Can you take a look at this discussion on the talk page of the Bangladesh article? Aditya 07:12, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Closed AfD
Hey, just giving you a head's up that there were two AfDs open for the same page, HSC Examination 2014 Question Leak. I'm commenting here because you had commented on the first AfD. I proceedurally closed the first one since the second was more active and visible (and we don't need two open at the same time), so if you have any further comments or anything about the article, it should be done at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/HSC Examination 2014 Question Leak (2nd nomination). Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:32, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
fazlur khan
hello there, bad edits were made at Fazlur Khan please fix it. revert it to this version: https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Fazlur_Khan&oldid=618259778 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.97.142.119 (talk) 10:33, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
Proposal for WP:NCGN#Bangladesh
A convention for naming geographic locations in Bangladesh is proposed. You are invited to discuss. – nafSadh did say 01:24, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Invite
|
Please participate
There's a voting going on here. It needs to close, but consensus is not certain. We need more participation. The issues can't remain without a resolution. Please, check it out. Closure of the discussion has started. (refresh) Please, hurry. nafSadh did say 14:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC) |
Good night
I invite you to edit Calicut Review — Preceding unsigned comment added by EditorFromAsia (talk • contribs) 14:19, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Rajkumar Kanagasingam
Some time ago you participated at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Rajkumar Kanagasingam. As the article has recently been recreated, and nominated again for deletion, you are invited to participate in the new discussion at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Rajkumar Kanagasingam (2nd nomination). —Psychonaut (talk) 10:50, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 November 2015 (UTC)