Misplaced Pages

User talk:Clpo13: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:27, 6 December 2015 editClpo13 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,651 edits OneClickArchiver archived Disambiguation link notification for December 6 to User talk:Clpo13/Archive 10← Previous edit Revision as of 22:04, 6 December 2015 edit undoTruthIsDivine (talk | contribs)49 edits →Have you actually looked at the article you linked to? No mention of 33 million. Just use your head and think how illogical you are being.: new sectionNext edit →
Line 82: Line 82:


Thanks for reminding me, Clpo13. I don't know why IP users keep doing this. I did not do anything wrong! I hope this stops someday. But, once again, thanks for reminding me that I have not been blocked. ] (]) 02:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC) Thanks for reminding me, Clpo13. I don't know why IP users keep doing this. I did not do anything wrong! I hope this stops someday. But, once again, thanks for reminding me that I have not been blocked. ] (]) 02:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

== Have you actually looked at the article you linked to? No mention of 33 million. Just use your head and think how illogical you are being. ==

Please stop being an idiot.

Revision as of 22:04, 6 December 2015

This is Clpo13's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32Auto-archiving period: 14 days 
This is Clpo13's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32Auto-archiving period: 14 days 

Kuomintang in Burma

Hello and thank you for helping to format my references! Pleasantly surprised to see the edits after I woke up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZGantz (talk • contribs) 01:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

@ZGantz: You're quite welcome. clpo13(talk) 15:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)


HELLO! You wrote me a note, and I wanted to write back, but am not sure where to do it. Kayrenee (talk) 16:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC) I don't understand how to sign my post. I am kayrenee.

RFCs

Hello, thank you for your comments. :)

You commented in relation to European bio names. This was an issue which surfaced in July 2011 and continued for several months. It has long been resolved. FWIW There have already been several RFCs on the subject of European bio and place names, with the same overwhelming result each time, and hard-written into the MOS guidelines across multiple languages, so the issue is not a new RFC but getting editors to follow the results of previous RFCs and MOS. :) All the best, cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:43, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

Closure of Complykaro AfD

Hello Clpo13, the discussion on this specific nomination was far from uncontroversial - especially as none of the "Keep" voters bothered to provide a single new reference for their allegations (an extensive online search on my part did not come up with any independent in-depth sources). If you are allowed to self-revert this closure (not sure about the process), would you please do so to let an administrator look over the case? If not, could you advise if a WP:DRV would be the next step to check the situation? I appreciate that you are trying to trim down the backlog a bit, but I believe the decision in this particular case here was too hasty. The better solution for all involved would have been a userfication as suggested in the nomination's last 2 posts. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 17:03, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

@GermanJoe: I've undone my closure to allow for an admin to take a look. clpo13(talk) 17:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the quick response. Trimming that increasing AfD backlog is really helpful in general, but in that specific case an admin could probably userfy the article more easily - if such a compromise is the consensus. GermanJoe (talk) 17:21, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Closure of Cassidey AFD

Please undo your close of Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Cassidey expeditiously. This was a controversial discussion, not suitable for an NAC, and your close shows no attempt to determine whether several delete !votes, challenged as guideline-noncompliant, should be given significant weight (a task better left to admins generally). The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 17:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

@Hullaballoo Wolfowitz: Maybe you should poke an admin to look at the backlog. clpo13(talk) 17:44, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Dan Garodnick

I had a post taken down about Dan leading the 2015 PCVST purchase by Blackstone/Ivanhoe. Here are my sources:

http://www.garodnick.com/press-release/agreement-between-city-new-york-and-blackstone-group-term-sheet

http://www.garodnick.com/news/2015-10-22/blackstone-leads-deal-buy-stuyvesant-town-housing-complex

http://stuytownreport.blogspot.com/2015/10/garodnicks-view.html (this also shows how the residents feel)

http://therealdeal.com/blog/2015/10/29/how-stuy-town-was-won/

http://www.costar.com/News/Article/Blackstone-Ivanho%C3%A9-Cambridge-Reach-$53-Billion-Deal-for-Stuyvesant-Town-Prompting-Some-to-See-Similarities-to-2006/176514

http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20151020/BLOGS03/151029998/blackstone-group-leads-5-3b-purchase-of-stuy-town

http://www.gothamgazette.com/index.php/opinion/5947-the-future-of-stuyvesant-town-a-peter-cooper-village-garodnick

208.133.34.214 (talk) 19:47, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

You can add this information into the article with proper citations. I removed it originally because it was unsourced. clpo13(talk) 19:53, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Albasco.com

I already salted it after I deleted it. Thanks for closing the AfD.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:42, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

So I saw right after I saved. clpo13(talk) 21:43, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Closure of Kathleen Snavely AFD

I will say the same as I said here: why did you choose to close this as a redirect? The consensus did NOT appear to lean towards redirecting, the same article was nominated for deletion only a month ago (an kept), so you should at least consider both discussions. The consensus over the two discussions was leaning towards keeping. -- Ollie231213 (talk) 22:55, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

@Ollie231213: If you disagree with my interpretation of consensus, feel free to open a review at WP:DRV. clpo13(talk) 06:54, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Another one is Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Helmut Hoffer von Ankershoffen which I feel would be simpler simply reopening and relisted as one week is hardly enough to allow more comments without relisting and it would save everyone a 2nd nomination. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 19:18, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Fair enough. I relisted it. clpo13(talk) 19:22, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Thanks for reminding me, Clpo13. I don't know why IP users keep doing this. I did not do anything wrong! I hope this stops someday. But, once again, thanks for reminding me that I have not been blocked. DBrown SPS (talk) 02:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Have you actually looked at the article you linked to? No mention of 33 million. Just use your head and think how illogical you are being.

Please stop being an idiot.