Misplaced Pages

Naturopathy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:45, 13 August 2006 view source63.249.112.83 (talk) →Science and naturopathy← Previous edit Revision as of 17:20, 13 August 2006 view source Mccready (talk | contribs)3,705 edits →Ireland SchoolsNext edit →
Line 183: Line 183:
* Dublin, Galway, Cork, Limerick * Dublin, Galway, Cork, Limerick


]
] ]
] ]

Revision as of 17:20, 13 August 2006

Naturopathy
This article is part of the branches of CAM series.
CAM Classifications
NCCAM:Alternative Medical System
Modality:Professionalized
Knowledge:Doctorate
Culture:Western

Template:CamMenu

Naturopathic medicine (also known as naturopathy) is a school of medical philosophy and practice that seeks to improve health and treat disease chiefly by assisting the body's innate capacity to recover from illness and injury. Naturopathic practice may include a broad array of different modalities, including manual therapy, homeopathy, hydrotherapy, herbalism, acupuncture, counselling, environmental medicine, aromatherapy, wholefoods, and so on. Practitioners tend to emphasise an holistic approach to patient care. Naturopathy has its origins in the United States, but is today practised in many countries around the world in one form or another, where it is subject to different standards of regulation and levels of acceptance.

Naturopathic practitioners do not use invasive surgery, or most synthetic drugs, preferring "natural" remedies, i.e. relatively unprocessed or whole medications, such as herbs and foods. Licensed physicians from accredited schools are trained to use diagnostic tests such as imaging and blood tests before deciding upon the full course of treatment.

The mainstream scientific community has found little evidence for the effectiveness of most naturopathic modalities, and the concept of holistic medicine itself is widely disputed. Alternative medicine is often treated warily, as when a treatment is proven to be effective it is usually integrated into mainstream medicine.

History of naturopathic medicine

The term naturopathy was coined before 1900, by John Scheel, and used by Benedict Lust. Lust had been schooled in hydrotherapy and other natural health practices in Germany by Father Sebastian Kneipp, who sent Lust to the United States to bring them Kneipp's methods. In 1905, Lust founded the American School of Naturopathy in New York, the first naturopathic college in the United States. Lust took great strides in promoting the profession, culminating in passage of licensing laws in several states prior to 1935, including Arizona, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington and the existence of several naturopathic colleges.

Naturopathic medicine went into decline, along with most other natural health professions, after the 1930s, with the discovery of penicillin and advent of synthetic drugs such as antibiotics and corticosteroids in the post-war era, Lust's death, conflict between various schools of natural medicine (homeopathy, eclectics, physio-medicalism, herbalism, naturopathy, etc.), the rise of medical technology, and consolidation of political power in conventional medicine were all contributing factors. In 1910, when the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching published the Flexner Report which criticized many aspects of medical education in various institutions (natural and conventional), it was mostly seen as an attack on low-quality natural medicine education. It caused many such programs to shut down and contributed to the popularity of conventional medicine.

Naturopathic medicine never completely ceased to exist, however, as there were always a few states in which licensing laws existed—though at one point there were virtually no schools. One of the most visible steps towards the profession's modern renewal was the opening in 1956 of the National College of Naturopathic Medicine in Portland, Oregon. This was the first of the modern naturopathic medical schools offering four-year naturopathic medical training with the intention of integrating mainstream science and naturopathic principles and practice.

Naturopathy In India

Naturopathy has another stream that started in India in the 1900s. It was popularized by Mahatma Gandhi. He adopted and popularized this system because it was cheap and adaptable to the Indian soil. The system grew in popularity towards the close of 1900s, and today there are two streams of Naturopaths in India. The first are graduates of All India Naturopathy Council and are awarded DNYS (Diploma in Naturopathy and Yogic Sciences) after 3 years of guided study and internship. The other are graduates of Universities who are awarded BNYS (Bachelor of Naturopathy and Yogic Sciences). The Indian stream of Naturopathy differs from the Western stream in many ways, particularly in their emphasis of strict vegetarianism and yoga.

Naturopathic physicians and traditional naturopaths

There are two groups in the United States calling themselves "naturopaths" who have recently been engaged in legal battles. The term when originally coined by John Scheel, and popularized by Dr. Benedict Lust (a German name pronounced "loost") was to apply to those receiving an education in the basic medical sciences with an emphasis on natural therapies:

  • Naturopathic physicians
  • "Traditional" naturopaths

Naturopathic physicians

Naturopathic physicians in the United States are independent providers with training in conventional medical sciences, diagnosis and treatment, and natural therapeutics with licenses or registration granted by an individual state Naturopathic Board of Medical Examiners. They graduate from four-year nationally accredited naturopathic medical graduate schools. Naturopathic physicians training with respect to modalities is different, with a focus on nutrition, botanical medicine, homeopathy, hydrotherapy, physical manipulation, pharmacology, and minor surgery. Some naturopathic physicians have additional training in the following: natural childbirth, acupuncture, and Chinese medicine. These subspecialties often involve additional years of study. Naturopathic physicians are required to attend continuing education yearly in order to maintain and renew their license.

Naturopathic physicians are licensed to diagnose and treat disease in Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Idaho, Kansas, Maine, Montana, New Hampshire, Oregon, Utah, Vermont, Washington, US Territories: Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands.

Naturopathic Physicians are working in cooperation with both conventional and alternative practitioners to provide patients with complete medical care. Naturopathic physicians can bridge disparate fields with their training in both conventional and non-conventional treatment. Naturopathic physicians are able to identify and prescribe appropriate treatment including referral to conventional medical doctors.

For licensure as a naturopathic physician in one of those licensing U.S. states or Canadian provinces, candidates must have a Doctor of Naturopathic Medicine (abbreviated as N.D. or less commonly D.N.M.) / Doctor of Naturopathy (abbreviated as N.D.) from an accredited institution in the U.S. or Canada and pass certain examinations. The abbreviation N.D. can also denote the professional title and status Naturopathic Doctor that is conferred by the licensing body in the state or province. In contrast, the degree Doctor of Natural Medicine (abbreviated D.N.M.) does not qualify for licensure as a naturopathic physician.

Traditional Naturopaths

Vis medicatrix naturae, or the healing power of nature, is the central tenet of Traditional Naturopathy. Bacteria and viruses, which are always present, seldom cause problems in a healthy body. According to naturopathic practice, disease occurs when toxins that have accumulated internally – often due to incorrect lifestyle, a poor diet, and improper care of the body - weaken a person. While conventional medical treatments may rid the body of symptoms, these treatments alone do not bring about true healing. Rather than trying to attack specific symptoms and diseases, Traditional Naturopathy offers a holistic approach to the individual that supports the body in finding its way back to homeostasis.

Traditional Naturopathy is not a medical practice. While prescribing drugs and pharmaceuticals, performing surgery, and other invasive procedures clearly have their place in the hands of properly trained medical doctors, these practices are outside the scope of Traditional Naturopathy and are at odds with its fundamental principles. Instead Traditional Naturopaths focus on educating clients to lead healthier lives and on the use of naturopathic modalities such as light, water, herbs, healthy foods, and exercise to cleanse and strengthen the body and support its natural healing process.

Traditional Naturopaths receive training from correspondance schools or they receive their training from other practioners. None of the schools that award degrees to Traditional Naturopaths are accredited by the US Department of Education.

The Principles of Naturopathic Medicine

Naturopathy is based on six tenets or principles :

  1. "The healing power of nature"
  2. "Identify and treat the cause"
  3. "First do no harm"
  4. "Treat the whole person"
  5. "The physician as teacher"
  6. "Prevention"

"The healing power of nature"

The healing power of nature (vis medicatrix naturae), has two aspects: first that the body has the ability to heal itself and it is the naturopathic doctor's role to facilitate this natural process, and second that nature heals. Following this principle includes getting enough sleep, exercising, feeding the body nutritional food and, if needed, additional earth food, such as herbs, or algae, which is a living organism. It is asserted, yet strongly refuted by critics, that plants can gently move the body into health without side effects posed by some synthetic chemicals in modern pharmaceuticals.

"Identify and treat the cause"

The underlying root causes of disease must be removed for complete healing to take place (tolle causam). These root causes can exist at many levels: physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual. It is the naturopathic doctor's ostensible role to identify this root cause, in addition to alleviate suffering by treating symptoms.

"First do no harm"

The process of healing includes the manifestations of symptoms, so that any therapy that interferes with this natural healing process by masking symptoms is considered suppressive and should be avoided (primum no nocere). The natural life force of the individual should be supported to facilitate healing.

"Treat the whole person"

A core tenet of naturopathy is the belief that health must go beyond treatment of immediate symptoms (as with medicine), and instead treat the entire person's well being. That means treating the entire body, as well as the spirit/soul and mind.

"The physician as teacher"

It is the role of the naturopath to educate an individual in their practices and encourage that individual to "take responsibility for their own health" (docere). This cooperative relationship between doctor and patient is essential to healing.

"Prevention"

The ultimate goal of the naturopathic physician is prevention. The emphasis is on building health, not fighting illness. This is done by fostering healthy lifestyles, healthy beliefs, and healthy relationships.

Regulation

In some countries naturopathy is unregulated and the term "naturopath" is not clearly defined. This may lead to difficulty in ensuring that a practitioner is trained to a particular standard or has adequate liability insurance.

Regulation in Australia

There is currently no state licensure in Australia, rather the industry is self regulated. There is no protection of title, meaning that technically anyone can practise as a naturopath. The only way to obtain insurance for professional indemnity or public liability is by joining a professional association, which can only be achieved having completed an accredited course and gaining professional certification.

It is generally thought that with registration, a minimum four-year degree with a minimum 400 hours of supervised clinic practice will be required for practice. Currently only two institutions fulfil these requirements, the Australian College of Natural Medicine and Southern Cross University.

Professional naturopathic associations in Australia include:

  • Australian Natural Therapists Association (ANTA)
  • Australian Traditional-Medicine Society (ATMS), which has the largest membership base in the industry
  • National Herbalists Association of Australia (NHAA)
  • Australian Naturopathic Practitioners Association (ANPA)

There is currently debate in the industry over whether compulsory registration should be introduced for naturopaths, as with physiotherapy, osteopathy and chiropractic. ATMS is opposed on the grounds that naturopathic treatment is potentially dangerous, and that registration would therefore instigate a significant rise in insurance premiums. NHAA is pro-registration on the grounds that herbalists and naturopaths will never be taken seriously by the medical profession while unregistered. ANPA is also pro-registration, arguing that only registration of the profession will advance naturopathy as an integral part of healthcare in Australia.

Regulation in North America

Jurisdictions that currently regulate naturopathic medicine include:

Regulation in the United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom, naturopathy as a profession is very closely aligned with osteopathy. There is no government sponsored regulation of the profession, the largest body, The General Council & Register of Naturopaths recognises three courses in the UK, two being taught at osteopathic schools: the British College of Osteopathic Medicine; The College of Osteopaths Educational Trust; and one at the University of Westminster School of Integrated Health under the auspices of the B.Sc Health Science (Naturopathy) course.

Members of this register will either have completed a three or four year full time degree level course or possibly be a healthcare professional (Medical Doctor, Osteopath, Chiropractor, Nurse) who has completed a two year post-graduate Naturopathic Diploma, the N.D. As the naturopathic profession has developed along different lines in the UK, naturopaths do not perform minor surgery or have prescribing rights.

Scope of practice

In the United States both naturopathic physicians and traditional naturopaths use the degree designation of N.D. (doctor of naturopathic medicine), leading to considerable confusion about the scope of practice, education and training of a naturopathic practitioner (in the United Kingdom, N.D. stands for Diploma in Naturopathy). There is great contention between the two factions, as their political agendas are in opposition to each other: Naturopathic physicians, whose national professional organization is the American Association of Naturopathic Physicians, strive to recover licensure in all 50 states, whereas traditional naturopaths, whose professional organization is the American Naturopathic Medical Association, oppose licensure and often block licensing attempts. Negotiation is currently in progress between naturopathic physicians and traditional naturopaths to come to a resolution to this problem and agree to use different degree titles and designations, but so far this has not been a successful endeavour.

Science and naturopathy

There is widespread support for the application of an evidence based medicine framework to assess health outcomes and that systematic reviews with strict protocols are essential. Organisations such as the Cochrane Collaboration and Bandolier publish such reviews.

There are reports of evidence based medicine trials published for naturopathy.

Some modalities used in naturopathy are widely regarded as pseudoscience. Medical doctors often cite the large differences between naturopathic practitioners and the lack of scientific documentation of the safety and efficacy of their practices in order to justify limiting naturopathic scope. Advocates claim that naturopathic practitioners find it difficult to obtain financing for research due to the lack of prior research in many areas. Proponents state that this is slowly changing as naturopathic physicians develop research programs to help build up a foundation for evidence based treatment.

Conventional medicine is required to undergo rigorous testing; drug trials often last for a decade. A criticism of alternative therapies is that they are not subject to detailed safety assessment. Restrospective analysis of various herbal agents have found many to be of little therapeutic value and others to be harmful. This can be tied to the fact that 'natural' does not necessarily correspond to being beneficial or even benign. Also of concern is the ambiguity of the word "natural" and poor agreement as to its meaning.

While the above addresses a primary challenge to the validation process for "natural" remedies, perhaps of greater concern amongst critics is the lack of regulation of manufacturer claims in advertising. Common labeling practices suggest that herbal extracts are devoid of "drugs" or "chemicals". Claims of this type are patently false as every component of any plant extract is a chemical by definition. Likewise, claims as to the relative absence of toxicity in herbal extracts, when compared to conventional pharmaceutical preparations, are tainted by incongruent regulations for reporting of side effects. The manufacturers of conventional pharmaceutical agents are legally bound to record and report any perceived negative experiences during large scale clinical trials, though there may be no actual link between the tested drug and the perceived side effect. To wit, it is often the case that drugs are labelled with side effects such as headache, constipation, diarrhea, or sleep disturbance. These "side effects" are required to be listed even if they are found with no more regularity than they are in a placebo control group or within the general populace for that matter. Conversely, herbal manufacturers are not required to carry out such clinical studies nor to report any known adverse effects, even if said effects have been directly linked to injestion of the herbal preparation in question. While these advertising techniques do not negate the potential for some beneficial uses of various herbal agents, and they do not necessarily reflect upon the validity of naturopathic medicine as a field of study, critics suggest that they do serve to beguile the public through the employment of nothing more than legally permissible semantics and selective reporting.

Naturopathic modalities may be controversial (eg homeopathy), or have proven effectiveness only for very specific conditions (eg acupuncture, aromatherapy) Some naturopaths may use these modalities as panaceas or to improve the patient's quality of life.

See also

External links

Advocacy

Naturopathic physicians:

Traditional naturopaths:

Certifying Organizations:

Criticism

Support

"Profile of Profession: Naturopathic Practice" Center for the Health Professionals UCSF

North American Schools

Australian Schools

UK Schools

Ireland Schools

Categories: