Misplaced Pages

:Possibly unfree files/2015 December 8: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree files Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:50, 8 December 2015 editRichard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users195,161 edits If it was a federal facility or the FBI, it would be public domain.← Previous edit Revision as of 02:52, 8 December 2015 edit undoRichard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users195,161 edits DreamGuy, you have been a contributor for 10 years, you must have picked up some copyright law knowledge by now. --~~~~Next edit →
Line 13: Line 13:
* This image belongs to Colorado Springs Police Dept. It is not affiliated with the US federal government. All works by a county department may be subject to copyright, not what the uploader claims. Also, the ] was deleted on Commons as not permissible. Whether the image shall be kept or removed based on ] can be discussed here... or later. ] (]) 02:37, 8 December 2015 (UTC) * This image belongs to Colorado Springs Police Dept. It is not affiliated with the US federal government. All works by a county department may be subject to copyright, not what the uploader claims. Also, the ] was deleted on Commons as not permissible. Whether the image shall be kept or removed based on ] can be discussed here... or later. ] (]) 02:37, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
:It was deleted after not having permission, even though PD images do not need permission. As you were the one who got it deleted from Commons with falsehoods, and you also moved the page from a consensus name to your own favored name, you seem to be working to undermine the article instead of working following Misplaced Pages policies. To see you jump on this is no surprise. A zillion Misplaced Pages articles use recent mugshots for the same reason: they want these images used and release them to be used and the government allows them to be used. Funny how it's this article you object to. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> 02:45, 8 December 2015 (UTC) :It was deleted after not having permission, even though PD images do not need permission. As you were the one who got it deleted from Commons with falsehoods, and you also moved the page from a consensus name to your own favored name, you seem to be working to undermine the article instead of working following Misplaced Pages policies. To see you jump on this is no surprise. A zillion Misplaced Pages articles use recent mugshots for the same reason: they want these images used and release them to be used and the government allows them to be used. Funny how it's this article you object to. <small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) </span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> 02:45, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
::Mugshots from some jurisdictions may be free from copyright restrictions. We aren't talking about those. I don't see any evidence that '''this''' image is in the public domain. ] (]) 02:49, 8 December 2015 (UTC) ::Mugshots from some jurisdictions may be free from copyright restrictions. We aren't talking about those. I don't see any evidence that '''this''' image is in the public domain.
] (]) 02:49, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
::: DreamGuy, you have been a contributor for 10 years, you must have picked up some copyright law knowledge by now. --] (]) 02:52, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - Unlike Florida, Colorado does not have a sunshine law making most public records public domain. If it was a federal facility or the FBI, it would be public domain. --] (]) 02:48, 8 December 2015 (UTC) *'''Delete''' - Unlike Florida, Colorado does not have a sunshine law making most public records public domain. If it was a federal facility or the FBI, it would be public domain. --] (]) 02:48, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - clearly invalid PD claim. (])<sup>(])</sup> 02:48, 8 December 2015 (UTC) *'''Delete''' - clearly invalid PD claim. (])<sup>(])</sup> 02:48, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:52, 8 December 2015

< December 7 December 9 >

December 8

File:Senator Mike Gabbard, 2015.jpg

File:Senator Mike Gabbard, 2015.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Clearly not uploader's own work; see official profile at . Taking here instead of tagging copyvio because I'm not sure of the copyright status of works of the Hawaii state government. (ESkog) 01:08, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Robert Dear in a mugshot.jpg

File:Robert Dear in a mugshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • This image belongs to Colorado Springs Police Dept. It is not affiliated with the US federal government. All works by a county department may be subject to copyright, not what the uploader claims. Also, the same image was deleted on Commons as not permissible. Whether the image shall be kept or removed based on WP:NFCC can be discussed here... or later. George Ho (talk) 02:37, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
It was deleted after not having permission, even though PD images do not need permission. As you were the one who got it deleted from Commons with falsehoods, and you also moved the page from a consensus name to your own favored name, you seem to be working to undermine the article instead of working following Misplaced Pages policies. To see you jump on this is no surprise. A zillion Misplaced Pages articles use recent mugshots for the same reason: they want these images used and release them to be used and the government allows them to be used. Funny how it's this article you object to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DreamGuy (talk • contribs) 02:45, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Mugshots from some jurisdictions may be free from copyright restrictions. We aren't talking about those. I don't see any evidence that this image is in the public domain.

Jonathunder (talk) 02:49, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

DreamGuy, you have been a contributor for 10 years, you must have picked up some copyright law knowledge by now. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 02:52, 8 December 2015 (UTC)