| Revision as of 00:37, 8 August 2006 editWikipedianProlific (talk | contribs)Rollbackers2,142 edits I agree with Francis. More civil interactions and humility.← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:56, 13 August 2006 edit undoHoldenhurst (talk | contribs)419 edits Spam link?Next edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| : If I may add, I wholeheartedly agree with Francis. Its not that Soo is a bad editor or that he isn't familiar with the various concepts and code of practises for Misplaced Pages. Generally his edits are very commendable. But its rather a general underlying attitude that strongly suggests to me that the admin tools may not be used for the general good of the encyclopedia at this present time. I think another 2-3 months of being an editor and accepting/overcoming his past transgressions and he will be a brilliant administrator. (In my breif time here some of the best admins I've found are the ones who really had to work to prove it because of past 'incidents' like these. I really think he could be one) --]] 00:37, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | : If I may add, I wholeheartedly agree with Francis. Its not that Soo is a bad editor or that he isn't familiar with the various concepts and code of practises for Misplaced Pages. Generally his edits are very commendable. But its rather a general underlying attitude that strongly suggests to me that the admin tools may not be used for the general good of the encyclopedia at this present time. I think another 2-3 months of being an editor and accepting/overcoming his past transgressions and he will be a brilliant administrator. (In my breif time here some of the best admins I've found are the ones who really had to work to prove it because of past 'incidents' like these. I really think he could be one) --]] 00:37, 8 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Spam link? == | |||
| Sorry, I'm new here - why is iceyboard a spam link? Can someone reinsert it if it should be there.--] 19:56, 13 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:56, 13 August 2006
Agentsoo and Skull (symbolism)
I'm not answering this on the RfA page, as I don't believe in "that sort of thing". I am talking about Agentsoos attitude and deportment on Skull (symbolism). I mediated a dispute between an intransigent User:Dream Guy User:DreamGuy and an inflammatory User:Agentsoo. From the behaviour of Agentsoo (and Dream Guy) during this mediation I don't believe either would use the tools available to an administrator, nor the certain "influence" appropriately. - FrancisTyers · 00:46, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Incidentally, the behaviour of this user made such a bad impression on me that I actually remembered the username, after (as you put it) 8 months. :) - FrancisTyers · 00:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for your answer, Francis. It's understandable, I think, that you would remember the incident, then. Another question, though: your link above points to the user page of an indefinitely banned user: "This account (Dream_Guy) has been blocked indefinitely because it exists solely to impersonate or attack DreamGuy." Is that the correct account? Was this really just an attack or impersonation account?--Firsfron of Ronchester 00:56, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- (Also, sorry if it seems I'm harping on this, but this seems very out of character for Soo).--Firsfron of Ronchester 00:58, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- You're right, its without the space it seems. - FrancisTyers · 01:03, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Could you see yourself supporting in another eight months, if you were convinced that Agentsoo had changed since then? --Aquillion 22:01, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for your answer, Francis. It's understandable, I think, that you would remember the incident, then. Another question, though: your link above points to the user page of an indefinitely banned user: "This account (Dream_Guy) has been blocked indefinitely because it exists solely to impersonate or attack DreamGuy." Is that the correct account? Was this really just an attack or impersonation account?--Firsfron of Ronchester 00:56, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- If I saw some civil interactions with users on talk pages, a bit more humility, and more project involvement I'd probably reconsider in 8 months. - FrancisTyers · 22:42, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- If I may add, I wholeheartedly agree with Francis. Its not that Soo is a bad editor or that he isn't familiar with the various concepts and code of practises for Misplaced Pages. Generally his edits are very commendable. But its rather a general underlying attitude that strongly suggests to me that the admin tools may not be used for the general good of the encyclopedia at this present time. I think another 2-3 months of being an editor and accepting/overcoming his past transgressions and he will be a brilliant administrator. (In my breif time here some of the best admins I've found are the ones who really had to work to prove it because of past 'incidents' like these. I really think he could be one) --WikipedianProlific 00:37, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Spam link?
Sorry, I'm new here - why is iceyboard a spam link? Can someone reinsert it if it should be there.--Holdenhurst 19:56, 13 August 2006 (UTC)