Misplaced Pages

United States embargo against Cuba: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:58, 29 October 2004 editProf. Olivetree (talk | contribs)14 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 15:42, 29 October 2004 edit undoNeutrality (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators165,407 edits Total rewrite.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''] ] against ]''' was imposed by the United States on ] ] as a response to Cuba's alignment with the ] during the ]. While the US government had initially been supportive of the ] it turned against ] when the Cuban government began implementing large scale ] of the economy without compensating American businesses that had been expropriated. The embargo remains in place to this day and has been the target of almost unanimous international criticism including annual votes in the ] in which resolutions calling on the US to lift its sanctions pass with exeptionally large majority (173 to 3 in ]), and on October 28 2004 179 to 4 (USA, Israel, Marshall Islands and Palau) and one abstention (Micronesia). The '''United States embargo on ]''' is a trade ] imposed on ] by the ] on ]. The embargo took effect on ], ] as a response to Cuba's alignment with the ] during the ]. Today the embargo is still in effect, making it one of the longest embargoes in modern history. It remains an extremely controversial issue worldwide.


While the U.S. government had initially been supportive of the ], it turned against ] when the Cuban government began implementing large-scale ] of the economy without compensating American businesses that had been expropriated.
The embargo was re-enforced in October ] by the '']'' and the '']'' of ]. While the US has sought to normalize trade relations with other ]s such as the ] and ] there is a large lobby among ]s, particularly those living in ], in favour of the embargo which makes it politically difficult for either the ] or the ] to substantially change American policy towards Cuba.

The embargo has been the source of almost unanimous international criticism. Annual votes in the ] ] that call on the U.S. to lift its sanctions pass with exeptionally large majorities (173 to 3 in ]), and 179 to 4 in ]. In the 2004 vote, only the U.S., ], the ] and ] voted aganist the resolution (with ] abstaining).

The embargo was re-enforced in October ] by the ] and in ] by the ]. While the U.S. has sought to normalize trade relations with other ]s such as the ] and ], there is a large lobby among ]s, particularly those living in ], in favor of the embargo. This makes it politically difficult for either the ] or the ] to substantially change American policy towards Cuba.


{{stub}} {{stub}}

Revision as of 15:42, 29 October 2004

The United States embargo on Cuba is a trade embargo imposed on Cuba by the United States on Cuba. The embargo took effect on February 3, 1962 as a response to Cuba's alignment with the Soviet Union during the Cold War. Today the embargo is still in effect, making it one of the longest embargoes in modern history. It remains an extremely controversial issue worldwide.

While the U.S. government had initially been supportive of the Cuban Revolution, it turned against Fidel Castro when the Cuban government began implementing large-scale nationalization of the economy without compensating American businesses that had been expropriated.

The embargo has been the source of almost unanimous international criticism. Annual votes in the United Nations General Assembly that call on the U.S. to lift its sanctions pass with exeptionally large majorities (173 to 3 in 2002), and 179 to 4 in 2004. In the 2004 vote, only the U.S., Israel, the Marshall Islands and Palau voted aganist the resolution (with Micronesia abstaining).

The embargo was re-enforced in October 1992 by the Cuban Democracy Act and in 1996 by the Helms-Burton Act. While the U.S. has sought to normalize trade relations with other Communist states such as the China and Vietnam, there is a large lobby among Cuban-Americans, particularly those living in Florida, in favor of the embargo. This makes it politically difficult for either the Republican Party or the Democratic Party to substantially change American policy towards Cuba.

This article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

External links

Category: