| Revision as of 00:16, 8 August 2006 editElgringo18 (talk | contribs)90 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:45, 14 August 2006 edit undo75.1.248.19 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| :Personally having articles divided into distinct sections with headings makes them much easier to read (and ] agrees). Unfortunately for coral snakes, the big list of species makes it kind of ugly. Maybe the list should be last and the extra text below it be moved up for readability? -] 16:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | :Personally having articles divided into distinct sections with headings makes them much easier to read (and ] agrees). Unfortunately for coral snakes, the big list of species makes it kind of ugly. Maybe the list should be last and the extra text below it be moved up for readability? -] 16:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::I say move the taxonomy list to a different list and link it. ] 17:45, 14 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Coral Snake Page Vandalised == | == Coral Snake Page Vandalised == | ||
Revision as of 17:45, 14 August 2006
um, this is a good article-User:Carsoncocars
look at the copperhead page. It would be nice if articles on snakes all followed that format. Much easier to read.
- Personally having articles divided into distinct sections with headings makes them much easier to read (and WP:Guide to writing better articles agrees). Unfortunately for coral snakes, the big list of species makes it kind of ugly. Maybe the list should be last and the extra text below it be moved up for readability? -Dawson 16:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- I say move the taxonomy list to a different list and link it. 75.1.248.19 17:45, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Coral Snake Page Vandalised
Hi, This page has been vandalised. Can someone please correct it. Thanks and regards, David
Can anyone confirm that this is incorrect: "and can even have red bands touching yellow bands,"...it should either be stated "and can even have red bands touching BLACK bands," or as is without the 'even,' since the coloration described here does not contrast with the preceeding paragraph. --Elgringo18 00:16, 8 August 2006 (UTC)