| Revision as of 03:49, 25 November 2015 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,502 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Aircorn/Archive 6) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:26, 29 December 2015 edit undoMinor4th (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,501 edits →ARBGMO Notice: new sectionTag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692221704 --> | <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692221704 --> | ||
| == ARBGMO Notice == | |||
| {{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' | |||
| '''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding all pages relating to genetically modified organisms, agricultural biotechnology, and agricultural chemicals, broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. <p>In addition to the discretionary sanctions described above '''the Arbitration Committee has also ] a ] which states that you cannot make more than one ] on the same page in the same 24 hour period''' on all pages relating to genetically modified organisms, agricultural biotechnology, or agricultural chemicals, broadly construed and subject to ]. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> | |||
| I am making you aware of the Arb editing restrictions and enforcement due to your recent edits on ] and ] - your large-scale removals of sourced content in these articles, without engaging in discussion and seeking consensus, is disruptive and could result in arbitration enforcement. <b class="nounderlines" style="border:1px solid #999;background:#fff"><span style="font-family:papyrus,serif">]]</span></b> 03:26, 29 December 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:26, 29 December 2015
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 Archives |
1 2 3 4 5 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
October 2015
Your recent editing history at Craig Joubert shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Woovee (talk) 00:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you.Jeppiz (talk) 08:15, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
I have closed the report noted above with the result that you are strongly warned not to edit war in future. I have been lenient in not blocking you, and this will not be repeated in future. Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 19:19, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
Talk: Craig Joubert
This behaviour is not suitable because this breaks the discussion. The headline of this new topic has to be withdrawn and the reply has to be included in the previous topic. Thanks. If not, I'm going to report this to the administrator. Woovee (talk) 22:10, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
- I don't see how this is a problem to be honest and since two other editors have also replied I don't think moving it is a good idea. AIRcorn (talk) 22:50, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ARBGMO Notice
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all pages relating to genetically modified organisms, agricultural biotechnology, and agricultural chemicals, broadly construed, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.In addition to the discretionary sanctions described above the Arbitration Committee has also imposed a restriction which states that you cannot make more than one revert on the same page in the same 24 hour period on all pages relating to genetically modified organisms, agricultural biotechnology, or agricultural chemicals, broadly construed and subject to certain exemptions.
I am making you aware of the Arb editing restrictions and enforcement due to your recent edits on Genetically modified foods and Seralini affair - your large-scale removals of sourced content in these articles, without engaging in discussion and seeking consensus, is disruptive and could result in arbitration enforcement. Minor4th 03:26, 29 December 2015 (UTC)