| Revision as of 16:11, 10 January 2016 view sourceGalassi (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,902 edits →2 Socks← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:22, 10 January 2016 view source SimpsonDG (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users645 edits →"because it's a banned user; can't you read the page history?" ?Next edit → | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
| ::I don't know what your problem is, but I am an editor in good standing, and have been for years. I notified you of an apparently incorrect edit summary you made, and this is how you respond. Settle down, and treat everyone with respect. ] (]) 20:05, 6 January 2016 (UTC) | ::I don't know what your problem is, but I am an editor in good standing, and have been for years. I notified you of an apparently incorrect edit summary you made, and this is how you respond. Settle down, and treat everyone with respect. ] (]) 20:05, 6 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ::: You know perfectly well why those IPs are being reverted and whose socks they are. The IP was blocked, as you (or that other editor) could easily have looked up. Others had been reverting that particular edit before me. Routine reverts of obvious banned socks are done via rollback, which by default doesn't leave an explanation in an edit summary. That's how it's supposed to be done. This has all been explained to you before. The vandal in question is a criminal harasser, every edit of his on this project constitutes a continuation of that harassment, and people who persistently obstruct dealing with him are not much better than the harasser himself. Now go away. ] ] 20:10, 6 January 2016 (UTC) | ::: You know perfectly well why those IPs are being reverted and whose socks they are. The IP was blocked, as you (or that other editor) could easily have looked up. Others had been reverting that particular edit before me. Routine reverts of obvious banned socks are done via rollback, which by default doesn't leave an explanation in an edit summary. That's how it's supposed to be done. This has all been explained to you before. The vandal in question is a criminal harasser, every edit of his on this project constitutes a continuation of that harassment, and people who persistently obstruct dealing with him are not much better than the harasser himself. Now go away. ] ] 20:10, 6 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :::: Future Perfect -- WATCH YOUR LANGUAGE. If you're an adult, you should know better than to use that kind of language in public. I don't know what your problem is, but have some manners. ] (]) 22:22, 10 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == Ariel Winter == | == Ariel Winter == | ||
Revision as of 22:22, 10 January 2016
 | Note: I like to keep discussion threads together, so if you leave a message here I will usually respond here. If I have begun a discussion on your page, I'll see it if you respond there.
A {{ping}} would be appreciated if you reply at a later date. {{Talkback}} notes here will generally not be needed. Note to new and non-logged-in editors: Due to a long-term issue with vandalism, this talkpage has unfortunately had to be semi-protected. If you need to contact me and can't post here, please just post your message on your own talkpage or the talkpage of the relevant article and add the code "{{ping|Future Perfect at Sunrise}}" to it, then I'll be sure to see it. |
 Archives |
|---|
Soren (given name)
- your answer is provided in the talk page!
Happy New Year!
Dear Future Perfect at Sunrise,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)
This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").
POV editing
User Meganesia is promoting Assyrian POVs on the Assyrian people article.
"because it's a banned user; can't you read the page history?" ?
That was your reason given for a re-deletion here: . However, your previous deletion edit summary does not give a reason: . StuRat (talk) 19:52, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Fuck off, troll. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:56, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- I don't know what your problem is, but I am an editor in good standing, and have been for years. I notified you of an apparently incorrect edit summary you made, and this is how you respond. Settle down, and treat everyone with respect. StuRat (talk) 20:05, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- You know perfectly well why those IPs are being reverted and whose socks they are. The IP was blocked, as you (or that other editor) could easily have looked up. Others had been reverting that particular edit before me. Routine reverts of obvious banned socks are done via rollback, which by default doesn't leave an explanation in an edit summary. That's how it's supposed to be done. This has all been explained to you before. The vandal in question is a criminal harasser, every edit of his on this project constitutes a continuation of that harassment, and people who persistently obstruct dealing with him are not much better than the harasser himself. Now go away. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:10, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- Future Perfect -- WATCH YOUR LANGUAGE. If you're an adult, you should know better than to use that kind of language in public. I don't know what your problem is, but have some manners. SimpsonDG (talk) 22:22, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- You know perfectly well why those IPs are being reverted and whose socks they are. The IP was blocked, as you (or that other editor) could easily have looked up. Others had been reverting that particular edit before me. Routine reverts of obvious banned socks are done via rollback, which by default doesn't leave an explanation in an edit summary. That's how it's supposed to be done. This has all been explained to you before. The vandal in question is a criminal harasser, every edit of his on this project constitutes a continuation of that harassment, and people who persistently obstruct dealing with him are not much better than the harasser himself. Now go away. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:10, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- I don't know what your problem is, but I am an editor in good standing, and have been for years. I notified you of an apparently incorrect edit summary you made, and this is how you respond. Settle down, and treat everyone with respect. StuRat (talk) 20:05, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Ariel Winter
Hi, I think it'd be ok to lift the full protection now given that both Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Celebrity_breast_size and Talk:Ariel Winter#Breast Reduction have arrived at a consensus. -- Chamith (talk) 08:18, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
2 Socks
It seems that User:Voyevoda got 2 socks as User:Voevoda and User:Воевода. Worth checking.--Galassi (talk) 16:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/%D0%92%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0 this is not formatting correctly.--Galassi (talk) 16:11, 10 January 2016 (UTC)