| Revision as of 13:52, 13 January 2016 editMSGJ (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators130,781 edits You have been blocked from editing for making personal attacks toward other users. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:28, 13 January 2016 edit undoEaglestorm (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,735 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for making ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. — Martin <small>(] · ])</small> 13:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)</div> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for making ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. — Martin <small>(] · ])</small> 13:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)</div> | ||
| <!-- Template:uw-aoablock --> | <!-- Template:uw-aoablock --> | ||
| {{tlx|unblock|2=reason=This block is highly unjustifiable due to proponents ganging up to undo all the hard work many editors have done for years by inserting their own deletionist agenda and working in an ad hoc alliance against me. This is the kind of editing dictatorship that has turned off people who wanted to contribute. These people wantonly delete material that's taken years to create but yet the same kind of material exists with proper references in other types of articles. One of those people is only good at deletions and tagging but does not even try to make it better with the existing material. Bringing this illegal dispute to ANI only signifies their determination to muzzle my work and what personal attacks are these people taking about? --] (]) 15:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)}} | |||
Revision as of 15:28, 13 January 2016
Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).
| This is Eaglestorm's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 Archives |
January 2016
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=This block is highly unjustifiable due to proponents ganging up to undo all the hard work many editors have done for years by inserting their own deletionist agenda and working in an ad hoc alliance against me. This is the kind of editing dictatorship that has turned off people who wanted to contribute. These people wantonly delete material that's taken years to create but yet the same kind of material exists with proper references in other types of articles. One of those people is only good at deletions and tagging but does not even try to make it better with the existing material. Bringing this illegal dispute to ANI only signifies their determination to muzzle my work and what personal attacks are these people taking about? --Eaglestorm (talk) 15:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)}}