| Revision as of 15:40, 13 January 2016 editMSGJ (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators130,781 edits →January 2016: note← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:54, 13 January 2016 edit undoEaglestorm (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,735 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for making ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. — Martin <small>(] · ])</small> 13:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)</div> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''48 hours''' for making ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by first reading the ], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. — Martin <small>(] · ])</small> 13:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)</div> | ||
| <!-- Template:uw-aoablock --> | <!-- Template:uw-aoablock --> | ||
| {{unblock|reason= This block is highly unjustifiable due to proponents ganging up to undo all the hard work many editors have done for years by inserting their own deletionist agenda and working in an ad hoc alliance against me. This is the kind of editing dictatorship that has turned off people who wanted to contribute. These people wantonly delete material that's taken years to create but yet the same kind of material exists in other articles. One of those people is only good at deletions and tagging but does not even try to make it better with the existing material. Bringing this nonsensical dispute to ANI only signifies their determination to muzzle my work and what personal attacks are these people taking about? I can't even believe these accusations of harassment. Why? Did I ever leave a message |
{{unblock|reason= This block is highly unjustifiable due to proponents ganging up to undo all the hard work many editors have done for years by inserting their own deletionist agenda and working in an ad hoc alliance against me, which includes other people who have taken it upon themselves to join the discussion in another field. This is the kind of editing dictatorship that has turned off people who wanted to contribute. These people wantonly delete material that's taken years to create but yet the same kind of material exists in other articles. One of those people is only good at deletions and tagging but does not even try to make it better with the existing material. Bringing this nonsensical dispute to ANI only signifies their determination to muzzle my work and what personal attacks are these people taking about? I can't even believe these accusations of harassment. Why? Did I ever leave a message on their talk pages and trolled their contributions? The fact that there's none only shows their desperation, and don't bother using this argument against me, you people want me to debase myself at the hands of people who have their own personal agendas against me. As much as I want this block revoked, but their claims should not be dignified and everything must be kept the way they were before those people came along and RUINED EVERYTHING. ] (]) 15:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)}} | ||
| :To the reviewing administrator: there is some relevant discussion at ] — Martin <small>(] · ])</small> 15:40, 13 January 2016 (UTC) | :To the reviewing administrator: there is some relevant discussion at ] — Martin <small>(] · ])</small> 15:40, 13 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:54, 13 January 2016
Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).
| This is Eaglestorm's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
 Archives |
January 2016
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Eaglestorm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This block is highly unjustifiable due to proponents ganging up to undo all the hard work many editors have done for years by inserting their own deletionist agenda and working in an ad hoc alliance against me, which includes other people who have taken it upon themselves to join the discussion in another field. This is the kind of editing dictatorship that has turned off people who wanted to contribute. These people wantonly delete material that's taken years to create but yet the same kind of material exists in other articles. One of those people is only good at deletions and tagging but does not even try to make it better with the existing material. Bringing this nonsensical dispute to ANI only signifies their determination to muzzle my work and what personal attacks are these people taking about? I can't even believe these accusations of harassment. Why? Did I ever leave a message on their talk pages and trolled their contributions? The fact that there's none only shows their desperation, and don't bother using this argument against me, you people want me to debase myself at the hands of people who have their own personal agendas against me. As much as I want this block revoked, but their claims should not be dignified and everything must be kept the way they were before those people came along and RUINED EVERYTHING. Eaglestorm (talk) 15:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This block is highly unjustifiable due to proponents ganging up to undo all the hard work many editors have done for years by inserting their own deletionist agenda and working in an ad hoc alliance against me, which includes other people who have taken it upon themselves to join the discussion in another field. This is the kind of editing dictatorship that has turned off people who wanted to contribute. These people wantonly delete material that's taken years to create but yet the same kind of material exists in other articles. One of those people is only good at deletions and tagging but does not even try to make it better with the existing material. Bringing this nonsensical dispute to ANI only signifies their determination to muzzle my work and what personal attacks are these people taking about? I can't even believe these accusations of harassment. Why? Did I ever leave a message on their talk pages and trolled their contributions? The fact that there's none only shows their desperation, and don't bother using this argument against me, you people want me to debase myself at the hands of people who have their own personal agendas against me. As much as I want this block revoked, but their claims should not be dignified and everything must be kept the way they were before those people came along and RUINED EVERYTHING. ] (]) 15:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=This block is highly unjustifiable due to proponents ganging up to undo all the hard work many editors have done for years by inserting their own deletionist agenda and working in an ad hoc alliance against me, which includes other people who have taken it upon themselves to join the discussion in another field. This is the kind of editing dictatorship that has turned off people who wanted to contribute. These people wantonly delete material that's taken years to create but yet the same kind of material exists in other articles. One of those people is only good at deletions and tagging but does not even try to make it better with the existing material. Bringing this nonsensical dispute to ANI only signifies their determination to muzzle my work and what personal attacks are these people taking about? I can't even believe these accusations of harassment. Why? Did I ever leave a message on their talk pages and trolled their contributions? The fact that there's none only shows their desperation, and don't bother using this argument against me, you people want me to debase myself at the hands of people who have their own personal agendas against me. As much as I want this block revoked, but their claims should not be dignified and everything must be kept the way they were before those people came along and RUINED EVERYTHING. ] (]) 15:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=This block is highly unjustifiable due to proponents ganging up to undo all the hard work many editors have done for years by inserting their own deletionist agenda and working in an ad hoc alliance against me, which includes other people who have taken it upon themselves to join the discussion in another field. This is the kind of editing dictatorship that has turned off people who wanted to contribute. These people wantonly delete material that's taken years to create but yet the same kind of material exists in other articles. One of those people is only good at deletions and tagging but does not even try to make it better with the existing material. Bringing this nonsensical dispute to ANI only signifies their determination to muzzle my work and what personal attacks are these people taking about? I can't even believe these accusations of harassment. Why? Did I ever leave a message on their talk pages and trolled their contributions? The fact that there's none only shows their desperation, and don't bother using this argument against me, you people want me to debase myself at the hands of people who have their own personal agendas against me. As much as I want this block revoked, but their claims should not be dignified and everything must be kept the way they were before those people came along and RUINED EVERYTHING. ] (]) 15:28, 13 January 2016 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- To the reviewing administrator: there is some relevant discussion at Eaglestorm and How I Met Your Mother articles — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:40, 13 January 2016 (UTC)