Revision as of 14:37, 16 August 2006 editKilo-Lima (talk | contribs)10,579 edits →[]: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:38, 16 August 2006 edit undoKilo-Lima (talk | contribs)10,579 editsm sspaNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #FFF5F5; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the ]. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, ] for detailed instructions.'' | |||
===]=== | ===]=== | ||
;Evidence | ;Evidence |
Revision as of 14:38, 16 August 2006
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
User:WorkingHard
- Evidence
This user has been reverting numerous deletions of irrelevent information I and other users have made at Jessica Lunsford. This user is obviously upset that I am deleting his advertising having made the website for this dead girl. After a recent edit this user posted as WorkingHard and pasted a note on my talk page that I was banned from posting.Cumberbund 07:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comments
- It is the IP that needs blocking, not the account. The IP has been blocked. Iolakana| 14:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)