| Revision as of 05:10, 18 January 2016 editFeminist (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers157,830 edits Undid revision 700384093 by SSTflyer (talk) not a typo← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:20, 18 January 2016 edit undoNorthBySouthBaranof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,475 edits BLP1ENext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| *'''Delete''' – The subject has received news coverage only for one event; qualifies for deletion per ]. Upon source searches, the subject also does not appear to meet ] at this time. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 00:40, 18 January 2016 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' – The subject has received news coverage only for one event; qualifies for deletion per ]. Upon source searches, the subject also does not appear to meet ] at this time. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">]<sup>]</sup></span> 00:40, 18 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| **Is the continued criticism/harassment this person received not sustained coverage? How's on Vice? What about ? ]] 05:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC) | **Is the continued criticism/harassment this person received not sustained coverage? How's on Vice? What about ? ]] 05:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ***Are those sources sufficient to write a ''biography'' of Binx, something more than the tiny and highly-slanted stub we have now? Can it ever be expanded beyond "Binx made some people mad, and those people harassed her"? If not, shouldn't we just merge and redirect to a related article? ] (]) 05:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:20, 18 January 2016
Chanty Binx
- Chanty Binx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
BLP sourced only to a negative Huffington Post opinion column. Doesn't meet WP:BIO. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Lack of sources in article is not a reasonable argument for deletion. Highly famous and influential feminist. Alex (talk) 23:48, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. A quick Google search revealed many more reliable sources. I am not sure if WP:BEFORE has been done. sst✈ 23:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Which? A Google News search finds virtually nothing - three of them are nothing but user comments on otherwise-entirely-unrelated articles which show up in the search. There are a number of random blogs which pop up in a regular Google search, but those aren't suitable sources for biographies. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 00:01, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 23:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 23:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 23:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete – The subject has received news coverage only for one event; qualifies for deletion per WP:BLP1E. Upon source searches, the subject also does not appear to meet WP:BASIC at this time. North America 00:40, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Is the continued criticism/harassment this person received not sustained coverage? How's this article on Vice? What about this? sst✈ 05:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Are those sources sufficient to write a biography of Binx, something more than the tiny and highly-slanted stub we have now? Can it ever be expanded beyond "Binx made some people mad, and those people harassed her"? If not, shouldn't we just merge and redirect to a related article? NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 05:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Is the continued criticism/harassment this person received not sustained coverage? How's this article on Vice? What about this? sst✈ 05:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)