| Revision as of 05:29, 18 January 2016 editNorthBySouthBaranof (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers33,475 editsm tweak← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:30, 18 January 2016 edit undoFeminist (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers157,830 edits replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ***Are those brief mentions sufficient to write a ''biography'' of Binx, something more than the tiny and highly-slanted stub we have now? Can those sources allow us to expand the article beyond "Binx made some people mad, and those people harassed her"? If not, that's not a biography and it should probably be merged and redirected. ] (]) 05:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC) | ***Are those brief mentions sufficient to write a ''biography'' of Binx, something more than the tiny and highly-slanted stub we have now? Can those sources allow us to expand the article beyond "Binx made some people mad, and those people harassed her"? If not, that's not a biography and it should probably be merged and redirected. ] (]) 05:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment''' - The HuffPost link is a textbook example of a ], not a news story, and all statements sourced to it must be attributed to the writer. It cannot be used as a source for facts. ] (]) 05:25, 18 January 2016 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' - The HuffPost link is a textbook example of a ], not a news story, and all statements sourced to it must be attributed to the writer. It cannot be used as a source for facts. ] (]) 05:25, 18 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| **{{ec}} These are ] concerns. The most important thing is that notability is established, not whether the text in the sources can be mentioned in the article. Do you want me to 5x expand this article and nominate this for DYK? ]] 05:30, 18 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:30, 18 January 2016
Chanty Binx
- Chanty Binx (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
BLP sourced only to a negative Huffington Post opinion column. Doesn't meet WP:BIO. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Lack of sources in article is not a reasonable argument for deletion. Highly famous and influential feminist. Alex (talk) 23:48, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. A quick Google search revealed many more reliable sources. I am not sure if WP:BEFORE has been done. sst✈ 23:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Which? A Google News search finds virtually nothing - three of them are nothing but user comments on otherwise-entirely-unrelated articles which show up in the search. There are a number of random blogs which pop up in a regular Google search, but those aren't suitable sources for biographies. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 00:01, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 23:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 23:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 23:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete – The subject has received news coverage only for one event; qualifies for deletion per WP:BLP1E. Upon source searches, the subject also does not appear to meet WP:BASIC at this time. North America 00:40, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Is the continued criticism/harassment this person received not sustained coverage? How's this article on Vice? What about this? sst✈ 05:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Are those brief mentions sufficient to write a biography of Binx, something more than the tiny and highly-slanted stub we have now? Can those sources allow us to expand the article beyond "Binx made some people mad, and those people harassed her"? If not, that's not a biography and it should probably be merged and redirected. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 05:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Is the continued criticism/harassment this person received not sustained coverage? How's this article on Vice? What about this? sst✈ 05:06, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - The HuffPost link is a textbook example of a opinion blog, not a news story, and all statements sourced to it must be attributed to the writer. It cannot be used as a source for facts. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 05:25, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) These are WP:SURMOUNTABLE concerns. The most important thing is that notability is established, not whether the text in the sources can be mentioned in the article. Do you want me to 5x expand this article and nominate this for DYK? sst✈ 05:30, 18 January 2016 (UTC)