Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Ashburne Hall: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 13:22, 20 January 2016 editNecrothesp (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators189,698 edits →Ashburne Hall ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:38, 20 January 2016 edit undoNecrothesp (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators189,698 edits →Ashburne Hall Next edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*'''Keep''' ] says "if a topic has received '''significant coverage''' in ''']''' that are '''] of the subject''', it is '''presumed''' to be suitable for a stand-alone article" - which part of that has not been met? --] (]) 22:20, 19 January 2016 (UTC)		*'''Keep''' ] says "if a topic has received '''significant coverage''' in ''']''' that are '''] of the subject''', it is '''presumed''' to be suitable for a stand-alone article" - which part of that has not been met? --] (]) 22:20, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
	:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ]] 01:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)</small>		:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ]] 01:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)</small>
	*'''Keep''' per ]. Grade II-listed building and plenty of coverage. -- ] (]) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)		*'''Keep''' per ]. Grade II-listed building and plenty of coverage. The Historic England listing gives very good reasons as to its historic and architectural significance. -- ] (]) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
	:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)</small>		:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)</small>
	:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)</small>		:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)</small>

Revision as of 13:38, 20 January 2016

Ashburne Hall

Ashburne Hall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable on its own - All encyclopedia worthy information is included in the Fallowfield Campus article ツStacey (talk) 20:53, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Keep WP:GNG says "if a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article" - which part of that has not been met? --Redrose64 (talk) 22:20, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 01:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Keep per WP:GEOFEAT. Grade II-listed building and plenty of coverage. The Historic England listing gives very good reasons as to its historic and architectural significance. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)