Misplaced Pages

User talk:98.90.88.137: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:43, 23 January 2016 editOnel5969 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers938,313 edits vandal5← Previous edit Revision as of 14:14, 23 January 2016 edit undoMPFitz1968 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers35,312 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Heroes (TV series). (TW)Next edit →
Line 33: Line 33:


] This is your '''only warning'''; if you ] Misplaced Pages again, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> ] <sup>]</sup> 13:43, 23 January 2016 (UTC) ] This is your '''only warning'''; if you ] Misplaced Pages again, as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --> ] <sup>]</sup> 13:43, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 14:14, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
:''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice -->

Revision as of 14:14, 23 January 2016

January 2016

Information icon Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Google News has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 20:54, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Reading (process) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU 21:18, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Google News with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. CAPTAIN RAJU 21:18, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Viviane (Chausson). Ninney (talk) 21:19, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, as you did at Prince Rostislav (Rachmaninoff), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ninney (talk) 21:20, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, as you did at Cooking Channel, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ninney (talk) 21:21, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, as you did at Food Network, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ninney (talk) 21:21, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, as you did at The Noonday Demon, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ninney (talk) 21:23, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, as you did at Tilt–shift photography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ninney (talk) 21:24, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 21:24, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, as you did at Heroes (TV series), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Onel5969 13:08, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, as you did at Heroes (TV series), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Onel5969 13:11, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, as you did at Heroes (TV series), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Onel5969 13:43, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Heroes (TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MPFitz1968 (talk) 14:14, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
User talk:98.90.88.137: Difference between revisions Add topic