| Revision as of 19:58, 24 January 2016 editBeeblebrox (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators112,927 edits →User:Brayden96 unblocked: cmt← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:28, 25 January 2016 edit undoOpabinia regalis (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators16,306 edits →User:Brayden96 unblocked: almost doneNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| :::Bah, my understanding is that appeals opened before the dissolution of the Subcommittee are still seen through a resolution. <span style="font-size:10pt;color:white;background:black;padding:0 3px;"><big>☺</big> · ] · ]</span> 19:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC) | :::Bah, my understanding is that appeals opened before the dissolution of the Subcommittee are still seen through a resolution. <span style="font-size:10pt;color:white;background:black;padding:0 3px;"><big>☺</big> · ] · ]</span> 19:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ::::If that's the case it seems a perfect example of why we got rid of BASC to begin with. Full arbcom cases are usually decided in less time. ] (]) 19:58, 24 January 2016 (UTC) | ::::If that's the case it seems a perfect example of why we got rid of BASC to begin with. Full arbcom cases are usually decided in less time. ] (]) 19:58, 24 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :::::FYI, we are ''almost'' at the end of the remaining BASC appeals. ] (]) 05:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:28, 25 January 2016
|
This page documents the decisions of an Arbitration Committee subcommittee. As this page is not widely watched, decisions posted here should not be discussed here; please use the committee noticeboard talk page instead. For instructions on appealing a block, see here. |
 Archives of this page: |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 45 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
User:Brayden96 unblocked
Following a successful appeal, User:Brayden96 has been unblocked. GorillaWarfare (talk) 04:49, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- I've raised issues with this unblock at GorrillaWarfare's talk page before noticing this; I'm not sure this page is watched at all but I'm fine with discussion taking place wherever best suited; GW can move my talk page messages here is she wishes. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 07:32, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- I have a different concern, that being that BASC doesn't exist anymore, so....yea, what? Beeblebrox (talk) 19:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Bah, my understanding is that appeals opened before the dissolution of the Subcommittee are still seen through a resolution. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 19:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- If that's the case it seems a perfect example of why we got rid of BASC to begin with. Full arbcom cases are usually decided in less time. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- FYI, we are almost at the end of the remaining BASC appeals. Opabinia regalis (talk) 05:28, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- If that's the case it seems a perfect example of why we got rid of BASC to begin with. Full arbcom cases are usually decided in less time. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:58, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Bah, my understanding is that appeals opened before the dissolution of the Subcommittee are still seen through a resolution. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 19:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- I have a different concern, that being that BASC doesn't exist anymore, so....yea, what? Beeblebrox (talk) 19:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)