| Revision as of 19:31, 24 January 2016 editJohnsoniensis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users720,824 edits keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:40, 25 January 2016 edit undoDavey2010 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers142,512 edits Closing debate, result was keep (non-admin closure)Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' | |||
| <!--Template:Afd top | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result was '''keep'''. <small>]</small> –]<sup>]</sup> 19:40, 25 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|P}} | |||
| :{{la|Ashburne Hall}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | :{{la|Ashburne Hall}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 19: | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)</small> | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)</small> | ||
| {{clear}} | |||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | |||
Revision as of 19:40, 25 January 2016
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 19:40, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Ashburne Hall
- Ashburne Hall (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable on its own - All encyclopedia worthy information is included in the Fallowfield Campus article ツStacey (talk) 20:53, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep WP:GNG says "if a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article" - which part of that has not been met? --Redrose64 (talk) 22:20, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 01:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GEOFEAT. Grade II-listed building and plenty of coverage. The Historic England listing gives very good reasons as to its historic and architectural significance. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep for reasons given by Redrose and Necrothesp.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 19:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.