| Revision as of 23:52, 31 October 2004 editUngtss (talk | contribs)6,685 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:56, 31 October 2004 edit undoUngtss (talk | contribs)6,685 edits npov name / text proposalNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| ==PROPOSAL== | ==PROPOSAL== | ||
| i would like to change the name of this article to "Creation account(s) in Genesis |
i would like to change the name of this article to "Creation account(s) in Genesis," because there is a dispute as to whether there is one more more accounts in the text. I would also like to replace the text in this article with the text in ], which describes both POVs with regard to the text in a more evenhanded, NPOV fashion. Any thoughts? ] 23:56, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:56, 31 October 2004
- 1) posting both places because i want to make sure somebody besides you hears this. summary on the page, fine -- whatever -- have your happyfuntime (although i think that the controversy is not pertinent to the discussion, as CREATIONISTS do not ascribe to mr cheesedreams pet interpretation of the text -- but whatever -- as long as there's equal time, i'm cool). i would like to ask for a vote, however, on whether to change the title of the article to account(s). Thoughts? Ungtss 23:12, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I HEARBY APOLOGIZE FOR RESPONDING TO CHEESEDREAM'S INCIVILITY WITH INCIVILITY OF MY OWN. please forgive my error. Ungtss 23:12, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
PROPOSAL
i would like to change the name of this article to "Creation account(s) in Genesis," because there is a dispute as to whether there is one more more accounts in the text. I would also like to replace the text in this article with the text in Creation account(s) in Genesis, which describes both POVs with regard to the text in a more evenhanded, NPOV fashion. Any thoughts? Ungtss 23:56, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)