| Revision as of 03:13, 17 August 2006 editChacor (talk | contribs)13,600 edits →Re: SPUI II← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:49, 17 August 2006 edit undoMitchazenia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators79,980 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| </table><br> | </table><br> | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ==Minor Edits== | |||
| Remember to mark your edits as '''m'''inor when, but only when, they genuinely are (see ]). Marking a major change as a minor one, or vice versa, is condsidered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that an edit of a page that is spelling corrections, formatting, and minor rearranging of text should be flagged as a 'minor edit'. <!-- Template:Minor --> ] (]) 21:11, 12 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Yes I guessed that. :P You really should ''only'' tag edits as minor edits when they are that kind of thing. Also, ] are veryuseful. Yes they are a bit inconvenient, but if you do them it helps other editors know whats going on.--] (]) 23:19, 12 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Well, I'm not going to make ''any'' articles for the foreseeable future, I've got more important tasks than writing articles on fishspinners. I'll let Hink assess it he will be along soon I'm sure, hes been doing more of that lately.--] (]) 23:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==1987 depressions== | |||
| It will take me a while to look though stuff in order to find the old tracking maps. My guess is they're still at the parent's home, and if that's true, it will take months to access. I'll look up the reanalysis spreadsheet and see if much is mentioned about them. ] 01:31, 13 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: Kate == | |||
| Ehh, I think Irfanfaiz's Kate article is better. However, I don't think you should continue publishing them. We should work more on getting the existing articles towards better status, like Fabian, before adding more no-impact start articles. ] (<small>]</small>) 02:43, 13 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Calm down == | |||
| Please calm down with the article creations. We don't need those new articles on the low-impact storms. Instead, please go back and fix up some of the articles you made. Inline sources are a good start. Try and find records and impact for them. Also, there's plenty of information in the tropical discussions. ] (<small>]</small>) 17:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :If you could do that for each of the articles you made, then I'd be happy. Also, Erika isn't even terribly good as it is. Long quotes should rarely, if ever, be used. You should use the content from the quotes. There is probably still more info out there on Erika if you take the time to find it. ] (<small>]</small>) 02:54, 14 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: SPUI == | |||
| Please never leave ] messages on my talk page again. I don't like SPUI, but I have never seen him beg for page protection, and most (but not all) of his deletion nominations have valid points. Phrases like "is a pissy" and "whines until his man-titties lactate" have <big>'''no place'''</big> on Misplaced Pages. | |||
| While I do not like SPUI, it is not my intention to have him banned permanently. It is my intention to force him to behave -- which, with the exception of the incident on ] that forced me to take a wikibreak, he has done recently. | |||
| Please up your maturity level. I've had my eye on you for a while, and repeating behavior like this will cause me to take action against you, not SPUI. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 20:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't care who wrote it originally. You're still the one who put it on my talk page. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 20:20, 14 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours for making unnecessary, and very strong, personal attacks about ]. Relevant diffs are: | |||
| * | |||
| * | |||
| Please come back after the block expires as a more civil Wikipedian. If you feel that the block is unjustified, place {{tl|unblock}} on your talk page. Cheers! --<span class="user-sig user-Shreshth91">May the Force be with you! ]]]]</span> 11:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Also, if you wish to change your username, please list yourself at ]; otherwise your name will not be recognized by the database. Thanks! --<span class="user-sig user-Shreshth91">May the Force be with you! ]]]]</span> 12:00, 15 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == More about SPUI (No blocks this time though ;D) == | |||
| (In response to your post on ]) I've seen flashes in the distance over this user, I'd suggest looking at some of the various user organizations around here related to dispute resolution. If you want to, you can take out an ], however that can be ''extremely'' trying on the nerves of all involved. If you're content to wait it out, most true problem users will end up getting themselves thrown out given the time. ] 06:20, 16 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: SPUI II == | |||
| Thanks for cleaning up your language, but I still disagree with about half of these points, and still don't have any desire to have SPUI banned permanently. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 03:09, 17 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Your crusade against SPUI has to stop, or it may earn you a longer block than 24 hours. ] 03:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:49, 17 August 2006
Template:HurricaneCraze32/Directing Buttons