Misplaced Pages

User talk:GirlForTruth: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:43, 31 January 2016 editMalik Shabazz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers106,163 edits WP:ARBPIA alert: new sectionTag: contentious topics alert← Previous edit Revision as of 03:54, 31 January 2016 edit undoMalik Shabazz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers106,163 edits Edit-warring at Mudar Zahran: new sectionNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> —&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 03:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC) }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> —&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 03:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

== Edit-warring at ] ==

You have now made '''four''' reverts on ] within the past 24 hours. The ], to which I referred above, states than an editor may make no more than '''three''' reverts in any 24-hour period. '''Please self-revert (undo) your last edit to the article''' or I will report your violation and you may be temporarily ]ed from editing.

Please join the discussion I have started at ]. Thank you. —&nbsp;]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 03:54, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:54, 31 January 2016

January 2016

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Mudar Zahran. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 03:25, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

WP:ARBPIA alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 03:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Edit-warring at Mudar Zahran

You have now made four reverts on Mudar Zahran within the past 24 hours. The three-revert rule, to which I referred above, states than an editor may make no more than three reverts in any 24-hour period. Please self-revert (undo) your last edit to the article or I will report your violation and you may be temporarily blocked from editing.

Please join the discussion I have started at Talk:Mudar Zahran#"Influence" section. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 03:54, 31 January 2016 (UTC)