| Revision as of 00:44, 18 August 2006 editRichardWeiss (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users75,870 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:49, 18 August 2006 edit undoRichardWeiss (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users75,870 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| says that I am in Florida (close enough) and the person editing Zapatero is in London, hence this person cannot be me, ] 00:44, 18 August 2006 (UTC) | says that I am in Florida (close enough) and the person editing Zapatero is in London, hence this person cannot be me, ] 00:44, 18 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
| is vandalism, rapidly reverted to the Pura Paja not the Hagiographer version and done quickly, ] |
is vandalism, rapidly reverted to the Pura Paja not the Hagiographer version and done quickly. Perhaps Hagiographer would explain why after the ban on Zapatancas and I at Zapatero he reverted to the Zapatancas version if he is not Zapatancas, perhaps Pura Paja was reverting him as a banned user from the article, an obvious conclusion given they are both from Spain (well that is using Hagiographer's logic). Hagiographer has already chased one person off the wikipedia with his false accusations, I on the other hand havce never used a sockpuppet here at Misplaced Pages as I am a man of integrity (means honradez, conoces la palabra y su significancia, Hagi?) ] 00:49, 18 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:49, 18 August 2006
User:SqueakBox (2nd)
I believe User:SqueakBox has used his sock puppet User:Pura Paja to edit articles related to José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, something forbidden by the ArbCom as can be found in Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/SqueakBox and Zapatancas.
The reasons that has led me to this conclusion are:
- He has vandalised the articles in a way typical of SqueakBox. He has redirected sub-articles such as Zapatero and the 2004 General Election (), Zapatero's domestic policy(), Zapatero's foreign policy (), Zapatero's early years (1960-2000)() to the main article José Luis Rodriguez Zapatero. Something SqueakBox has done a lot of times. In my opinion, it's absurd to redirect a subarticle to a main article. Redirections are used when several titles are valid for the same article. To redirect a subarticle to its parent article simply prevents other users from reading or editing them. If you don't want an article to be read why don't you ask it to be deleted? I believe isn't likely that two users come to do something so stupid.
- In the user page of User:Pura Paja, the supposed user claims he's from Britain, grew up in Spain and is from London. SqueakBox is also from Britain, what is a coincidence. What is more important and revealing is that this British user's first edits (see his contributions: ) are so similar to the nonsensical edits by User:SqueakBox in a Spain-related article. Moreover, he's not posted any explanation in any talk page to justify his decision although it supposed a change so depth to five articles.
- SqueakBox has created sock puppets in the past to circumvent the ArbCom's decision as can be found in Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/SqueakBox.
In regard to SqueakBox's obssesion with redirecting the articles the following text was posted in the evidence of the Arbitration case:
- SqueakBox vandalized the articles Zapatero's years as an opposition leader, Zapatero and the Local and Regional Elections of 2003, Zapatero and the 2004 General Election, Zapatero's domestic policy, Zapatero's foreign policy by redirecting them to the main article (José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero) from May 2, 2005 to January 16, 2006. SqueakBox claimed those articles were unnecessary (here, here) without ever explaining why he did not request their deletion, until he presented an AfD in December 28, 2005 (). He resorted to edit warring to keep the redirections (for example, in Zapatero and the Local and Regional Elections of 2003 he recovered the redirects here, here, here, here, here), even after the AfD was rejected and archived. He was only stopped when I threatened to report his behavior (here and here).
Hagiographer 08:41, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- I will take this to the administrators noticeboard, as I am currently involved in a "dispute" with Squeak and I am the admin who normally patrols this page. Please check Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#SqueakBox sockpuppets. Iolakana| 13:51, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
What rot, I am in London not Hondurss81.158.46.131 14:46, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Zapatero isnt on my watchlist any more and I have no interest in the article. probably a Zapatancas sockpuppet but who knows? What is certain is that I am in honduras as I can prove, SqueakBox 22:06, 17 August 2006 (UTC) Here is my IP, SB, 63.245.13.229 22:07, 17 August 2006 (UTC) Hagioghrapher cant claim its a coincidence that 2 people from the UK are editing this internationalo encyclopedia, SqueakBox 22:08, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Also Hagiographer is lying to claim I am vandalising Zapatero articles, I am no vandal and hjis lie, identical to those of Zapatancas, merely shows he is Zapatancas, SqueakBox 22:13, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
This says that I am in Florida (close enough) and the person editing Zapatero is in London, hence this person cannot be me, SqueakBox 00:44, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
This is vandalism, rapidly reverted to the Pura Paja not the Hagiographer version and done quickly. Perhaps Hagiographer would explain why after the ban on Zapatancas and I at Zapatero he reverted to the Zapatancas version if he is not Zapatancas, perhaps Pura Paja was reverting him as a banned user from the article, an obvious conclusion given they are both from Spain (well that is using Hagiographer's logic). Hagiographer has already chased one person off the wikipedia with his false accusations, I on the other hand havce never used a sockpuppet here at Misplaced Pages as I am a man of integrity (means honradez, conoces la palabra y su significancia, Hagi?) SqueakBox 00:49, 18 August 2006 (UTC)