| Revision as of 20:46, 18 August 2006 editYes0song (talk | contribs)1,354 editsm →Types of URI characters: bracket]← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:54, 18 August 2006 edit undoYes0song (talk | contribs)1,354 editsm →Types of URI characters: nowiki tagsNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| |+Reserved characters, per <nowiki>RFC 3986</nowiki> (January 2005) | |+Reserved characters, per <nowiki>RFC 3986</nowiki> (January 2005) | ||
| |- | |- | ||
| | <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> | | <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code>]</code> || <code></nowiki>]]</code> | ||
| |} | |} | ||
Revision as of 20:54, 18 August 2006
Percent-encoding, also known as URL encoding, is a mechanism for encoding information in a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) under certain circumstances. Although it is known as URL encoding, it is, in fact, used more generally within the main Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) set, which includes both Uniform Resource Locator (URL) and Uniform Resource Name (URN). As such, it is also used in the preparation of data of the "application/x-www-form-urlencoded" media type, as is often used in email messages and the submission of HTML form data in HTTP requests.
Percent-encoding in a URI
Types of URI characters
The characters in a URI, regardless of how they might be encoded, are taken from a set of unreserved characters for general use, and a smaller set of reserved characters that sometimes have special meaning in certain contexts. These sets and the circumstances under which certain characters from the reserved set have special meaning have changed slightly with each revision of specifications that govern URIs and URI schemes.
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
F |
G |
H |
I |
J |
K |
L |
M |
N |
O |
P |
Q |
R |
S |
T |
U |
V |
W |
X |
Y |
Z
| |
a |
b |
c |
d |
e |
f |
g |
h |
i |
j |
k |
l |
m |
n |
o |
p |
q |
r |
s |
t |
u |
v |
w |
x |
y |
z
| |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9
|
- |
_ |
. |
~ |
|||||||||||||
! |
* |
' |
( |
) |
; |
: |
@ |
& |
= |
+ |
$ |
, |
/ |
? |
% |
# |
[ |
]
|
No other characters are allowed in a URI.
Percent-encoding reserved characters
When a character from the reserved set (a "reserved character") has special meaning (a "reserved purpose") in a certain context, and a URI scheme says that is necessary to use that character for some other purpose, then the character must be percent-encoded. Percent-encoding a reserved character involves converting the character to its corresponding value in ASCII and then representing that value as a pair of hexadecimal digits. The digits, preceded by a percent sign ("%"), are then used in the URI in place of the reserved character.
For example, the reserved character "/", if used in the "path" component of a URI, has the special meaning of being a delimiter between path segments. If, according to a given URI scheme, "/" needs to be in a path segment, then the three characters "%2F" or "%2f" must be used in the segment instead of a raw "/".
Reserved characters that have no reserved purpose in a particular context may also be percent-encoded, but are not semantically different from those that are not percent-encoded.
For example, in the "query" component of a URI, "/" is still considered a reserved character, but it normally has no reserved purpose, unless a particular URI scheme says otherwise. When it has no reserved purpose, the character does not need to be percent-encoded.
URIs that differ only by the percent-encoding of reserved characters are not normally considered equivalent (denoting the same resource), unless it can be determined that the reserved characters in question have no reserved purpose. This determination is dependent upon the rules established for reserved characters by individual URI schemes.
Percent-encoding unreserved characters
Characters from the unreserved set can be percent-encoded in the same way as reserved characters. That is, if a scheme calls for an unreserved character to be used in a URI, either the raw character or its percent-encoded equivalent may be used interchangeably.
URIs that differ only by the percent-encoding of unreserved characters are equivalent by definition, but URI processors, in practice, may not always recognize this equivalence. For example, URI consumers shouldn't treat "%41" differently than "A" or "%7E" differently than "~", but some do. For maximum interoperability, URI producers are discouraged from percent-encoding unreserved characters.
Percent-encoding arbitrary data
Most URI schemes involve the representation of arbitrary data, such as an IP address or file system path, as components of a URI. URI scheme specifications should, but often don't, provide an explicit, clear mapping between URI characters and all possible data values being represented by those characters.
Binary data
Since the publication of RFC 1738 in 1994, it has been specified that schemes that provide for the representation of binary data in a URI must divide the data into 8-bit bytes and percent-encode each byte in the same manner as above, being careful to use raw unreserved characters, rather than percent-encoded sequences, where possible. For example, byte value FF (hexadecimal) should be represented by "%FF", but byte value 41 (hexadecimal) should be represented by "A", not "%41".
Character data
The procedure for percent-encoding binary data has often been extrapolated, sometimes inappropriately or without being fully specified, to apply to character-based data. In the World Wide Web's formative years, when dealing with data characters in the ASCII repertoire and using their corresponding bytes in ASCII as the basis for determining percent-encoded sequences, this practice was relatively harmless; it was just assumed that characters and bytes mapped one-to-one and were interchangeable. However, the need to represent characters outside the ASCII range quickly grew, and URI schemes and protocols often failed to provide standard rules for preparing character data for inclusion in a URI. Consequently, web applications began using different multi-byte, stateful, and other non-ASCII-compatible encodings as the basis for percent-encoding, leading to ambiguities and difficulty interpreting URIs reliably.
For example, many URI schemes and protocols based on RFCs 1738 and 2396 presume that the data characters will be converted to bytes according to some unspecified character encoding before being represented in a URI by unreserved characters or percent-encoded bytes. If the scheme does not allow the URI to provide a hint as to what encoding was used, or if the encoding conflicts with the use of ASCII to percent-encode reserved and unreserved characters, then the URI cannot be reliably interpreted. Some schemes fail to account for encoding at all, and instead just suggest that data characters map directly to URI characters, which leaves it up to implementations to decide whether and how to percent-encode data characters that are in neither the reserved nor unreserved sets.
Current standard
The generic URI syntax mandates that new URI schemes that provide for the representation of character data in a URI must, in effect, represent characters from the unreserved set without translation, and should convert all other characters to bytes according to UTF-8, and then percent-encode those values. This requirement was introduced in January 2005 with the publication of RFC 3986. URI schemes introduced before this date are not affected.
Not addressed by the current specification is what to do with encoded character data. For example, in computers, character data manifests in encoded form, at some level, and thus could be treated as either binary data or as character data when being mapped to URI characters. Presumably, it is up to the URI scheme specifications to account for this possibility and require one or the other, but in practice, few, if any, actually do.
Non-standard implementations
Internet Explorer uses a non-standard encoding for Unicode characters: %uxxxx, where xxxx is a Unicode value represented as four hexadecimal digits. This behavior is not specified by any RFC and has been rejected by the W3C.
The application/x-www-form-urlencoded type
When data that has been entered into HTML forms is submitted, the form field names and values are encoded and sent to the server in an HTTP request message using method GET or POST, or via email. The encoding used by default is based on a very early version of the general URI percent-encoding rules, with a number of modifications such as newline normalization and replacing spaces with "+" instead of "%20". The MIME type of data encoded this way is application/x-www-form-urlencoded, and it is currently defined (still in a very outdated manner) in the HTML and XForms specifications. In addition, the CGI specification contains rules for how web servers decode data of this type and make it available to applications.
When sent in an HTTP GET request, application/x-www-form-urlencoded data is included in the query component of the request URI. When sent in an HTTP POST request or via email, the data is placed in the body of the message, and the name of the media type is included in the message's Content-Type header.
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it.
External links
The following specifications all discuss and define reserved characters, unreserved characters, and percent-encoding, in some form or other:
- RFC 3986 / STD 66, the current generic URI syntax specification.
- RFC 2396 (obsolete) and RFC 2732 together comprised the previous version of the generic URI syntax specification.
- RFC 1738 (mostly obsolete) and RFC 1808 (obsolete), which define URLs.
- RFC 1630 (obsolete), the first generic URI syntax specification.
- W3C Guidelines on Naming and Addressing: URIs, URLs, ...
- W3C explanation of UTF-8 in URIs
Other resources:
- URL Encoding (or: 'What are those "%20" codes in URLs?') by Brian Wilson – URL encoding charts and a converter
- URLEncode Code Chart (from i-Technica) – a URL encoding chart
- Online Tool for URL Encoding/Decoding