| Revision as of 01:43, 14 February 2016 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,298,157 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Sir Joseph/Archive 4) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:39, 16 February 2016 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,298,157 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Sir Joseph/Archive 4) (botNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| {{archive box collapsible|auto=yes}} | {{archive box collapsible|auto=yes}} | ||
| == Draft prod idea == | |||
| ]. Any thoughts? -- ] (]) 06:35, 8 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == 18:33:53, 8 February 2016 review of submission by Willharriett == | |||
| {{Lafc|username=Willharriett|ts=18:33:53, 8 February 2016|declined=Draft:Tom_Fleming_(artist)}} | |||
| Dear Sir Joseph, I am requesting a re-review because the person I am writing about is absolutely notable and the references are very strong. Fleming doesn't have just one reason to be considered notable, but quite a few. Fleming designed and created characters for the WWE that have millions of fans and had an effect on pop culture with toys, posters, t-shirts sold all over the world. The reference that was used in the article is the actual page on the WWE website that shows Fleming's design concepts and original drawings with his "FLEMING" signature on them, and they actually zoom in on his signature on a couple of them to make sure he gets the credit! There is no better source than the official website of the WWE showing Fleming's actual drawings/designs. | |||
| Fleming is also notable due to his FOUR CHESLEY AWARD nominations! He wasn't nominated just once for possibly the highest honor in Fantasy/Sci-Fi art, but FOUR times! According to Misplaced Pages one of the major guidelines for being notable is "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor, or has been nominated for one several times". The references are the official announcements and posts by year, category and piece that Fleming was nominated in (and are absolutely independent of him). These nominations alone according to Misplaced Pages make him notable! | |||
| A THIRD reason and possibly the biggest one is his federal lawsuit that he won on copyright infringement against A major retailer HomeGoods, and a large licensing company ATI. For a single artist to go up against two monster retailers and WIN a case like this has a HUGE effect for all artist nationwide and possibly worldwide! That is why the Boston Globe one of the countries most reputable newspapers put him on the cover story in the business section a few weeks later. The reference used is the author, date and title of the article that was published by the Boston Globe that is completely independent of Fleming and what better source is there than a newspaper of that reputation? As a backup and another reference, I used the article that Art Business News published soon after the trial called "Artist Vs. Goliath". The title says it all....no? Once again, Art Business News is a very strong source and all info about the article was listed. | |||
| Lastly, Fleming has done work for the biggest companies in the world for Comics and gaming! There are artists that are listed on Misplaced Pages that passed as notable for just working in one genre of the market alone?For example, Misplaced Pages has some artists that have just worked for Magic the Gathering passed as notable. Fleming has done that along with a multitude of other things. | |||
| I have worked very hard on this article because I believe Fleming truly deserves and has earned a Misplaced Pages page and for the public to be aware of his accomplishments. I truly hope you agree and decide that the references are trustworthy, independent, and adequate for notability. Thanks and have a great day. ] (]) 18:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Willharriett | |||
| == Please comment on ] == | == Please comment on ] == | ||
Revision as of 01:39, 16 February 2016
I am: IN
 | This user previously used another account. |
| This is Sir Joseph's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
(I'll write back on my talk page, unless specifically request otherwise. Thanks!)
Template:Archive box collapsible
Please comment on Talk:Emily Dickinson
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Emily Dickinson. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Precisely
Know that Misplaced Pages is not some beis medrash, it's open to all. Chesdovi (talk) 19:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Exactly, you may think you're doing a favor to your cause, but others will see and use you as a pawn in their game. Do yourself, but more importantly do us a favor and tone it down. Stabberstinians and Rammerstinians don't need you as fodder to help them. Sir Joseph 19:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Your non-neutral POV-pushing is so blatantly obvious, why haven't you been blocked? I shall have to take this up with the powers that be. Chesdovi (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Having an opinion is allowed, you're the one editing in a non neutral manner, especially one giving fodder to one's enemies which is especially stupid. It's not against Wiki policies to have an opinion. Go speak to the powers that be, that is the common MO among the anti-Israel Wiki editors when they come upon an editor they can't chase away to try to have that editor blocked. Besides, the Satmar Rebbe forbids internet usage, so who is the one being intellectually dishonest here? You should be the one off the internet. Sir Joseph 19:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- I do try to edit neutrally. I really appreiciate it when others point out my erroneous pointy edits. What I don't like is having to contend with intolerant editors who dismiss out of hand the views and opinions held by other human beings. But that's expected from passionate nationalists who exist on Misplaced Pages to join the long and arduous fight against their "enemies". Chesdovi (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Stay off my talk page. Sir Joseph 19:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- I do try to edit neutrally. I really appreiciate it when others point out my erroneous pointy edits. What I don't like is having to contend with intolerant editors who dismiss out of hand the views and opinions held by other human beings. But that's expected from passionate nationalists who exist on Misplaced Pages to join the long and arduous fight against their "enemies". Chesdovi (talk) 19:46, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Having an opinion is allowed, you're the one editing in a non neutral manner, especially one giving fodder to one's enemies which is especially stupid. It's not against Wiki policies to have an opinion. Go speak to the powers that be, that is the common MO among the anti-Israel Wiki editors when they come upon an editor they can't chase away to try to have that editor blocked. Besides, the Satmar Rebbe forbids internet usage, so who is the one being intellectually dishonest here? You should be the one off the internet. Sir Joseph 19:19, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Your non-neutral POV-pushing is so blatantly obvious, why haven't you been blocked? I shall have to take this up with the powers that be. Chesdovi (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Western Wall
Regarding , I suggest you start a discussion at the relevant talk page. Chesdovi (talk) 20:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
1) I told you to stay off my talk page. 2) It's on you to discuss on the talk page, if you are the one making major changes to an article. 3) Have you ever edited Misplaced Pages under another name? Sir Joseph 20:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- I only saw your territorialist note after I had posted my previous note. But I understand and will not launch any rammings or stabbings against your page in retaliation at my expulsion from it. I will stay off your land, I mean page, sorry. After all, it is yours. But I will not have you attempt to dispossess me from the main space. That would be POV cleansing which is frowned upon. The only problem is, you don't seem to always reply at talk, hence my latest edit at anti-Zionist stronghold of Meah Shearim. I do not generally take kindly to editors who edit in order to obtain the upper hand against good faith editing, hoping to keep material they are repulsed by off Misplaced Pages for as long as possible. Had I rejigged the sections at Western Wall without adding a sub-section associated with anti-Zionsim, nothing, I presume, would have triggered the alarm on your pro-Zionist radar warning system. Chesdovi (talk) 20:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
You violated the 1RR at that page. Kindly revert or I will file a report. Thank you. nableezy - 00:51, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, youve violated the 3RR on that page, besides the ARBPIA 1RR. nableezy - 00:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- saying captured is a nnpov because then it opens up the page to a view of the wall being recaptured. That is why the neutral term of sovereignty is being used. Israel does exercise sovereignty over the site. A while back there was indeed a back and forth over this exact term, captured/re-captured and consensus was just to leave as exercised sovereignty which is a neutral term. We should try as much as possible to use terms that minimize edit wars, and let's try to have at least one article on Misplaced Pages that doesn't need to have IP conflict. This is about the Western Wall, not the IP conflict, it's a religious article, it has a bit about the conflict but it's mostly about the site and let's leave it at that. Let me know if you still want me to revert. I think the goal of Misplaced Pages is to build an encyclopedia not to aimlessly follow rules, and putting in weasel word, I think you should just leave be, the way it is now is fine and neutral. It means exactly what you want it to mean without the pov connotation. Sir Joseph 02:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- sovereignty is a term that says a state has legal title to that territory. That is not the case with Israel and East Jerusalem. Captured is simple fact, soveriegnty is contested minority opinion. Your view on what is neutral doesnt really concern me, and honestly I wish I had seen this response prior to you being blocked for the 3RR vio. Would have made things easier on me. nableezy - 16:10, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- saying captured is a nnpov because then it opens up the page to a view of the wall being recaptured. That is why the neutral term of sovereignty is being used. Israel does exercise sovereignty over the site. A while back there was indeed a back and forth over this exact term, captured/re-captured and consensus was just to leave as exercised sovereignty which is a neutral term. We should try as much as possible to use terms that minimize edit wars, and let's try to have at least one article on Misplaced Pages that doesn't need to have IP conflict. This is about the Western Wall, not the IP conflict, it's a religious article, it has a bit about the conflict but it's mostly about the site and let's leave it at that. Let me know if you still want me to revert. I think the goal of Misplaced Pages is to build an encyclopedia not to aimlessly follow rules, and putting in weasel word, I think you should just leave be, the way it is now is fine and neutral. It means exactly what you want it to mean without the pov connotation. Sir Joseph 02:35, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Debresser, can you take a look at the Western Wall page? Chesdovi is on one of his edit sprees. WOW! Looking at his most recent edits, I think he just got a job working for Al Jazeera. The PA I am sure will most likely try to contact him in the future. Sir Joseph 16:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Talk:List of state leaders in 2016#RfC: Inclusion of Palestine as a sub state of Israel
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of state leaders in 2016#RfC: Inclusion of Palestine as a sub state of Israel. Could you please give your opinion on whether or not Palestine should be considered a separate sovereign entity from Israel? Many thanks Spirit Ethanol (talk) 17:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Mike Bickle (minister)
Hi. Just got an e-mail update from the JTA about this pastor. I have added two references, but frankly I feel uncomfortable about even typing what he said. Perhaps you could expand it?Zigzig20s (talk) 18:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Western Wall Source
Have you even bothered reading the source?-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 00:34, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- The Goren one? Yeah, I did. It's very ambiguous. Sir Joseph 00:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- The material sourced was ambiguous. The source itself is quiet detailed and goes beyond Goren simply saying that Jews had only prayed at the western wall for 300 years. It documents and reliably a a notable minority point of view covering not only the western wall but also the temple mount.-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 00:48, 12 February 2016 (UTC)