| Revision as of 13:55, 17 February 2016 editMy very best wishes (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users56,383 edits →Reply: add← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:19, 18 February 2016 edit undoCometEncke (talk | contribs)380 edits →DS alert on Eastern Europe (and Putin in particular): new sectionTag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
| I know the subject, but did not edit this page for years. My comment was a kind of explanation: I only edit BLP pages about people who are interesting to me. Well, that was not entirely true. I also edit BLP pages when I see that someone else edits them clearly inappropriately - as in this case. ] (]) 13:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC) | I know the subject, but did not edit this page for years. My comment was a kind of explanation: I only edit BLP pages about people who are interesting to me. Well, that was not entirely true. I also edit BLP pages when I see that someone else edits them clearly inappropriately - as in this case. ] (]) 13:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
| == DS alert on Eastern Europe (and Putin in particular) == | |||
| {{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' | |||
| '''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 17:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:19, 18 February 2016
 Archives |
|
Archives |
|
Archives |
|
Archives |
|
Archives |
Regarding your revert
Hello,
Regarding this reversion, amongst which you added an edit summary "no, the lede is meant to provide a summary of the main points of the article,not mention every empire or state that ruled the territory."
Could you point me out any other empire or state that ruled all of Turkey for 200 years, or even close to it, had a considerable historical impact, and that's not listed in the lede?.. Especially as all other pre-Turkic history in some way, whether culturally or ethnicity-wise has been mentioned. - LouisAragon (talk) 16:50, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Please take this to the article talkpage so that other users can weigh in if they wish to. Athenean (talk) 16:55, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Hellenisation page
Hi, I have notice that you have undone my revisions on the Hellenisation section on the Alexander the Great page, and when you undid th revision gave the reason POV pushing. However I must disagree as while you undid the revision you kept the sources, and it was I that added those courses to support what I had written. Thus, what is currently written is not supported by any of the sources, or any scholarship. Furthermore, I fail to see how I was pushing my point of view, I was entirely fair and was not trying to detract from any side, I was simply reflecting modern scholarship on the matter and thus was not pushing my point of view. Indeed what you have replaced my revision with is entirely inaccurate, again I can understand your concern that my edit was perhaps an instance of historical revisionism; however it is not. I was simply correcting the section due to the addition of the mount Meru bit, keeping the original sources which are in no way relevant even contradicting the point made about mount Meru. Indeed, on the issue of mount Meru that is traditional Hindu "cosmology" (as it was describing the universe, not the solar system) and was not accepted beyond explaining the metaphysical universe, in traditional Indian astronomy/astrology; however, the use of a heliocentric planetary model with elliptical orbits was favored until the arrival of the Ptolemaic model which proved very popular as the arithmetic was simpler and yielded equally accurate results with the relatively inaccurate data available at the time. I will refrain from making any more edits until we resolve this issue, please do contact me soon as i want to settle this amiably and with no further disagreements. Looking forward to hearing from you.Bodha2 (talk) 18:47, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, was hoping for a response by now.Bodha2 (talk) 13:15, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Closure at WP:AE
Please see this notice which I added at Talk:Turco-Albanians. Though the enforcement request against you was closed with no action, the moral of the story for all parties seems obvious. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 19:10, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Latest Sulmues SPI
Thank you for your time about this one. Alexikoua (talk) 21:11, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Always a pleasure! Athenean (talk) 21:34, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
| Awarded to Athenean for extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service. Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:51, 9 January 2016 (UTC) |
January 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Europe may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- ]. Constantine also permanently moved the capital of the empire from Rome to ] (modern-day ] in 330 AD.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Europe, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Theodosius and Holy League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
attempt to intimidate
I made a single revert on the article and you came running to my talk page slapping it with a "3RR" warning. A bit hasty, especially since you've also made at least one revert. I can't avoid the impression you are trying to "win" this disagreement by intimidation rather than merit.Volunteer Marek (talk) 07:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oh no, you haven't just made "a single revert". You actually have three reverts in the last 25-26 hours. Athenean (talk) 07:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Revert Greece intro
Hi Athenean. User Yozerehs removed a section in the Greece introduction stating that "Greece is a democratic and developed country with an advanced high-income economy, a high quality of life and a very high standard of living". The reason for that was there is no citation. Obviously the citations exist (HDI, GDP per capita, Newsweek's best countries, all of these are found in the developed country article) and in my opinion no citation is needed since the links provide enough reference material. In any case can you please revert ? Thanks. 188.4.171.253 (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Reply
to this and this. Look, you are making bad faith assumptions on article talk page. This is not the place. If you really have concerns of this nature, please report/discuss them on appropriate administrative noticeboards. Thanks, My very best wishes (talk) 21:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
I know the subject, but did not edit this page for years. My comment was a kind of explanation: I only edit BLP pages about people who are interesting to me. Well, that was not entirely true. I also edit BLP pages when I see that someone else edits them clearly inappropriately - as in this case. My very best wishes (talk) 13:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
DS alert on Eastern Europe (and Putin in particular)
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 CometEncke (talk) 17:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)