| Revision as of 20:25, 18 February 2016 view sourceFuture Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators87,183 edits →Full protection on the misc desk?: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:34, 18 February 2016 view source Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators87,183 edits →Full protection on the misc desk?: +Next edit → | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| ::Next time, check what you've done please. ] (]) 17:47, 18 February 2016 (UTC) | ::Next time, check what you've done please. ] (]) 17:47, 18 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ::Or perhaps next time consider that your actions are disruptive, they are not helping, and they are against community consensus. You really do seem to have some personal vendetta going on, and I suggest you take a step back for your own peace of mind. ] (]) 19:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC) | ::Or perhaps next time consider that your actions are disruptive, they are not helping, and they are against community consensus. You really do seem to have some personal vendetta going on, and I suggest you take a step back for your own peace of mind. ] (]) 19:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
| ::: |
::: You would come across as more credible if you kept matters separate that are different. The recent protection of the Misc desk was because there were eight attacks within one hour from three different socks of the nazi troll posting holocaust denial. I protected for 12 hours. Find one single admin who would ''not'' have considered protection under such circumstances appropriate, on any page on this project. As for the reverts on the Science desk, if you like that Vote X person to no longer be banned, go to ANI to propose they should be unbanned. As long as they are banned, their edits will be removed, no matter by whom, no matter where, no matter what it is they post. That ''is'' policy, and that ''is'' community consensus, whether you like it or not. I'm not going to re-remove that particular posting we edit-conflicted over, but I do believe it shows exceedingly bad judgment on your part to restore it. The community consensus is that that person has no right to be on Misplaced Pages, and that also means they have no right to ask questions on the desk, no matter whether one of them happens to tickle your curiosity. Now go away and don't speak to me again; you are not welcome here. ] ] 20:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:34, 18 February 2016
 | Note: I like to keep discussion threads together, so if you leave a message here I will usually respond here. If I have begun a discussion on your page, I'll see it if you respond there.
A {{ping}} would be appreciated if you reply at a later date. {{Talkback}} notes here will generally not be needed. Note to new and non-logged-in editors: Due to a long-term issue with vandalism, this talkpage has unfortunately had to be semi-protected. If you need to contact me and can't post here, please just post your message on your own talkpage or the talkpage of the relevant article and add the code "{{ping|Future Perfect at Sunrise}}" to it, then I'll be sure to see it. |
 Archives |
|---|
Soren (given name)
- your answer is provided in the talk page!
Happy New Year!
Dear Future Perfect at Sunrise,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)
This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").
POV editing
User Meganesia is promoting Assyrian POVs on the Assyrian people article.
Full protection on the misc desk?
You are having a joke surely? DuncanHill (talk) 17:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oops, sorry, didn't mean to use full protection, of course. Must have misclicked. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- Next time, check what you've done please. DuncanHill (talk) 17:47, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- Or perhaps next time consider that your actions are disruptive, they are not helping, and they are against community consensus. You really do seem to have some personal vendetta going on, and I suggest you take a step back for your own peace of mind. SemanticMantis (talk) 19:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- You would come across as more credible if you kept matters separate that are different. The recent protection of the Misc desk was because there were eight attacks within one hour from three different socks of the nazi troll posting holocaust denial. I protected for 12 hours. Find one single admin who would not have considered protection under such circumstances appropriate, on any page on this project. As for the reverts on the Science desk, if you like that Vote X person to no longer be banned, go to ANI to propose they should be unbanned. As long as they are banned, their edits will be removed, no matter by whom, no matter where, no matter what it is they post. That is policy, and that is community consensus, whether you like it or not. I'm not going to re-remove that particular posting we edit-conflicted over, but I do believe it shows exceedingly bad judgment on your part to restore it. The community consensus is that that person has no right to be on Misplaced Pages, and that also means they have no right to ask questions on the desk, no matter whether one of them happens to tickle your curiosity. Now go away and don't speak to me again; you are not welcome here. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC)