| Revision as of 20:29, 20 February 2016 editMy very best wishes (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users56,383 edits →Reply: WP:NPA please← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:55, 20 February 2016 edit undoKhirurg (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers31,675 edits bye byeNext edit → | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Awarded to Athenean for extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service. ] (]) 21:51, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Awarded to Athenean for extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service. ] (]) 21:51, 9 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| |}<!--Template:The Barnstar of Diligence--> | |}<!--Template:The Barnstar of Diligence--> | ||
| == January 2016 == | |||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks"> to ] may have broken the ] by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .</span> | |||
| :List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page: | |||
| *<nowiki>]. Constantine also permanently moved the capital of the empire from Rome to ] </nowiki>{{red|'''('''}}<nowiki>modern-day ] in 330 AD.</nowiki> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow ]. Thanks, <!-- (1, 0, 0, 0) --><!-- User:BracketBot/inform -->] (]) 10:31, 30 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for January 31== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ] and ] ( | ). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 10:34, 31 January 2016 (UTC) | |||
| == attempt to intimidate == | |||
| I made a single revert on the article and you came running to my talk page slapping it with a "3RR" warning. A bit hasty, especially since you've also made at least one revert. I can't avoid the impression you are trying to "win" this disagreement by intimidation rather than merit.] (]) 07:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh no, you haven't just made "a single revert". You actually have three reverts in the last 25-26 hours. ] (]) 07:36, 9 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==Revert ] intro== | |||
| Hi Athenean. User Yozerehs removed a section in the Greece introduction stating that "Greece is a ] and ] with an advanced ], a high ] and a very high ]". The reason for that was there is no citation. Obviously the citations exist (HDI, GDP per capita, Newsweek's best countries, all of these are found in the developed country article) and in my opinion no citation is needed since the links provide enough reference material. In any case can you please revert ? Thanks. ] (]) 16:39, 9 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| ==Reply== | |||
| to and . Look, you are making bad faith assumptions on article talk page. This is not the place. If you ''really'' have concerns of this nature, please report/discuss them on appropriate administrative noticeboards. Thanks, ] (]) 21:53, 16 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| I know the subject, but did not edit this page for years. My comment was a kind of explanation: I only edit BLP pages about people who are interesting to me. Well, that was not entirely true. I also edit BLP pages when I see that someone else edits them clearly inappropriately - as in this case. ] (]) 13:55, 17 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
| :You continue doing the same (). Please do not. No, I made to improve the content, and that was not an ''exact'' revert to any previous version. ] (]) 20:28, 20 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:55, 20 February 2016
 Archives |
|
Archives |
|
Archives |
|
Archives |
|
Archives |
Regarding your revert
Hello,
Regarding this reversion, amongst which you added an edit summary "no, the lede is meant to provide a summary of the main points of the article,not mention every empire or state that ruled the territory."
Could you point me out any other empire or state that ruled all of Turkey for 200 years, or even close to it, had a considerable historical impact, and that's not listed in the lede?.. Especially as all other pre-Turkic history in some way, whether culturally or ethnicity-wise has been mentioned. - LouisAragon (talk) 16:50, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Please take this to the article talkpage so that other users can weigh in if they wish to. Athenean (talk) 16:55, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Hellenisation page
Hi, I have notice that you have undone my revisions on the Hellenisation section on the Alexander the Great page, and when you undid th revision gave the reason POV pushing. However I must disagree as while you undid the revision you kept the sources, and it was I that added those courses to support what I had written. Thus, what is currently written is not supported by any of the sources, or any scholarship. Furthermore, I fail to see how I was pushing my point of view, I was entirely fair and was not trying to detract from any side, I was simply reflecting modern scholarship on the matter and thus was not pushing my point of view. Indeed what you have replaced my revision with is entirely inaccurate, again I can understand your concern that my edit was perhaps an instance of historical revisionism; however it is not. I was simply correcting the section due to the addition of the mount Meru bit, keeping the original sources which are in no way relevant even contradicting the point made about mount Meru. Indeed, on the issue of mount Meru that is traditional Hindu "cosmology" (as it was describing the universe, not the solar system) and was not accepted beyond explaining the metaphysical universe, in traditional Indian astronomy/astrology; however, the use of a heliocentric planetary model with elliptical orbits was favored until the arrival of the Ptolemaic model which proved very popular as the arithmetic was simpler and yielded equally accurate results with the relatively inaccurate data available at the time. I will refrain from making any more edits until we resolve this issue, please do contact me soon as i want to settle this amiably and with no further disagreements. Looking forward to hearing from you.Bodha2 (talk) 18:47, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, was hoping for a response by now.Bodha2 (talk) 13:15, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Closure at WP:AE
Please see this notice which I added at Talk:Turco-Albanians. Though the enforcement request against you was closed with no action, the moral of the story for all parties seems obvious. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 19:10, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Latest Sulmues SPI
Thank you for your time about this one. Alexikoua (talk) 21:11, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Always a pleasure! Athenean (talk) 21:34, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
| Awarded to Athenean for extraordinary scrutiny, precision and community service. Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:51, 9 January 2016 (UTC) |