Revision as of 17:36, 19 August 2006 edit85.70.5.66 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:00, 19 August 2006 edit undoCentrx (talk | contribs)37,287 edits Unblock request deniedNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{dynamicIP|Czech Telecom a.s. - IOL}} | {{dynamicIP|Czech Telecom a.s. - IOL}} | ||
<sub>The comments placed on this page may concern various anonymous editors and have been ].</sub> | <sub>The comments placed on this page may concern various anonymous editors and have been ].</sub> | ||
{{unblock |
{{unblock reviewed|I usually log in if I decide to contribute to an article (although I think I wouldn't do that anyway if admins are going to behave like that). There is no reason to indef block an IP adress if it is not used for vandalism or constant or extreme personal attacks. My two last contributions were "I concur." and "I second that". Is that why I was blocked? Moreover, there was no message left at my talk page, anything. ] 17:35, 19 August 2006 (UTC)|There are no actual contributions in the last month. All recent edits are snarky or attack comments. —]→] • 20:00, 19 August 2006 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 20:00, 19 August 2006
Welcome!
Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Misplaced Pages? Create an account! Your IP address, To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. (Note: Sometimes, due to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to register). Applying an indefinite block to this IP is not appropriate, unless it is a soft block, because the IP address will later be reallocated to a different, unrelated, and unsuspecting user, thereby impairing access to Misplaced Pages in an inappropriate fashion. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. The best approach is to determine the CIDR IP numerical address range and make a higher-level decision to soft-block the entire range. http://www.arin.net/ (for approximately North America) and related sites can help to identify that range. Caution is advised when applying a range block as other Wikipedians, both registered and otherwise, may be affected.
Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
The comments placed on this page may concern various anonymous editors and have been archived.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).85.70.5.66 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I usually log in if I decide to contribute to an article (although I think I wouldn't do that anyway if admins are going to behave like that). There is no reason to indef block an IP adress if it is not used for vandalism or constant or extreme personal attacks. My two last contributions were "I concur." and "I second that". Is that why I was blocked? Moreover, there was no message left at my talk page, anything. 85.70.5.66 17:35, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Decline reason:
There are no actual contributions in the last month. All recent edits are snarky or attack comments. —Centrx→talk • 20:00, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.