Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:10, 19 August 2006

Welcome! Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Misplaced Pages? Create an account! Your IP address, 85.70.5.66, is part of a pool of dynamically allocated addresses and is registered to Czech Telecom a.s. - IOL. It may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. (Note: Sometimes, due to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to register). Applying an indefinite block to this IP is not appropriate, unless it is a soft block, because the IP address will later be reallocated to a different, unrelated, and unsuspecting user, thereby impairing access to Misplaced Pages in an inappropriate fashion. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. The best approach is to determine the CIDR IP numerical address range and make a higher-level decision to soft-block the entire range. http://www.arin.net/ (for approximately North America) and related sites can help to identify that range. Caution is advised when applying a range block as other Wikipedians, both registered and otherwise, may be affected. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports can be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

_{The comments placed on this page may concern various anonymous editors and have been archived.}

85.70.5.66 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I usually log in if I decide to contribute to an article (although I think I wouldn't do that anyway if admins are going to behave like that). There is no reason to indef block an IP adress if it is not used for vandalism or constant or extreme personal attacks. My two last contributions were "I concur." and "I second that". Is that why I was blocked? Moreover, there was no message left at my talk page, anything. 85.70.5.66 17:35, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Decline reason:

There are no actual contributions in the last month. All recent edits are snarky or attack comments. —Centrx→talk • 20:00, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

85.70.5.66 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Lie lie and lie lower. Show me one attack diff, and something being snarky is YOUR personal opinion. Anyway making only snarky comments in 1 month doesn't warrant an indef block does it? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Lie lie and lie lower. Show me one attack diff, and something being snarky is YOUR personal opinion. Anyway making only snarky comments in 1 month doesn't warrant an indef block does it? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Lie lie and lie lower. Show me one attack diff, and something being snarky is YOUR personal opinion. Anyway making only snarky comments in 1 month doesn't warrant an indef block does it? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

• Requests for unblock