| Revision as of 00:03, 19 February 2016 editFowler&fowler (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers62,953 edits →Muhammad Iqbal: my two cents← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:44, 24 February 2016 edit undoKautilya3 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,306 edits →ARBIPA sanctions alert: new sectionTag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| Please comment here: ] --] (]) 23:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC) | Please comment here: ] --] (]) 23:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
| == ARBIPA sanctions alert == | |||
| {{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.'' | |||
| '''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding ], ], and ], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 09:44, 24 February 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:44, 24 February 2016
 | I am back, in a manner of speaking, but a little out of touch and a lot out of time. I will be logging in sporadically, for now. |
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Muhammad Iqbal
Since you provided guidance to me regarding the sources on Mohenjo-daro. I came across some content which was recently added to Muhammad Iqbal. I was wondering what is your opinion regarding the sources and content added. This is not the mainstream view of Iqbal's relationship with Jinnah. Since you know how to identify the Hindu nationalist sources vs. neutral sources, i hope you can help me regarding these as well. The text which was added with the sources:
"Few months before his death, an ailing Iqbal met with Jawaharlal Nehru where he criticised Jinnah and praised Nehru by saying, "What is there common between Jinnah and you? He is a politician, you are a patriot."
Although a strong advocater of a separate Muslim state, towards the end of his life, Iqbal expressed serious reservations against the creation of such a state and felt that it's creation would be injurious to India as a whole and Muslims especially according to British writer Edward Thompson." Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 20:42, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker)The statement is sourced to Rajmohan Gandhi so is likely accurate. That said, it appears to be un-contextualized in the article. Gandhi mentions it in the light of the complicated relationship of Jinnah and Iqbal. In our article it gives the impression that Iqbal was disillusioned by Jinnah. --regentspark (comment) 21:03, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks regentspark, how about the other source because everything is not supported by Rajmohan Gandhi!tt
- The attribution to Jinnah is fully supported by the Rajmohan Gandhi reference so the Singh reference is unnecessary. But, I suggest either removing it for now (till Fowler figures it out!) or contextualizing it in a para on the relationship between Iqbal and Jinnah along the lines that Rajmohan Gandhi follows. --regentspark (comment) 02:09, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks regentspark, how about the other source because everything is not supported by Rajmohan Gandhi!tt
References
- ^ Brig K. Kuldip Singh (2013). Indian Military Thought: Kurukshetra to Kargil and Future Perspectives. Lancer Publishers & Distributors. p. 539. ISBN 9781935501930.
- ^ Rajmohan Gandhi (1986). Eight Lives: A Study of the Hindu-Muslim Encounter. State University of New York Press. p. 76. ISBN 9780887061967.
- Hello both, I'm on vacation and traveling. (Sorry I forgot to put the notice on my talk page.) So, I don't have access to sources. I would agree with RP. Rajmohan Gandhi is reliable and the Brigadier is not (the title itself is dubious). The brigadier says on some page or other that Timur the Lame massacred 100,000 people in Delhi, and the weight of the sacred thread collected from the bodies of the dead was one ton (= 1000 kg). I just found a shopkeeper and had him weigh three yards of twine, much thicker and longer than a sacred thread, and it weighed 5 grams. But 5 grams times 100,000 is only half a ton. :) Fowler&fowler«Talk» 00:02, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
RFC
Please comment here: Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Planning_a_few_initiatives --Tito Dutta (talk) 23:27, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
ARBIPA sanctions alert
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.