| Revision as of 03:49, 19 May 2006 editAtD (talk | contribs)886 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:08, 20 August 2006 edit undoJohn Quiggin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,635 edits →JEL classificationsNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| Are you the same radek who comments at Crooked Timber. In any case, you seem well-informed, so I thought I'd pitch this idea at you. I think there's a good case for adopting the JEL classification system to define categories in economics. I'm not sure, though, how to implement this, or even how to go about getting some sort of consensus. Any ideas? ] 09:50, 17 March 2006 (UTC) | Are you the same radek who comments at Crooked Timber. In any case, you seem well-informed, so I thought I'd pitch this idea at you. I think there's a good case for adopting the JEL classification system to define categories in economics. I'm not sure, though, how to implement this, or even how to go about getting some sort of consensus. Any ideas? ] 09:50, 17 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :: HI. I've run into some minor problems with this. We need a ] for the subfield of economics. But some people want to delete it and make it ] which I think is silly. If you agree, maybe you could join the discussion at ]. | |||
| == Welcome == | == Welcome == | ||
Revision as of 20:08, 20 August 2006
Radek Sz
Home Army and V1 and V2
Good job on this article. You may want to link it from other, relevant articles - I just added a releavant link to Armia Krajowa article, I am sure you can think of others. So far, it is not linked from many articles, see this. I look forward to your other additions. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 20:32, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
Comments at game theory
Thanks for all your comments at Talk:Game theory! Since you seem knowledgable about the area I thought you might be interested in joining us at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Game theory. We use the WikiProject to organize work on game theory articles. Feel free to add yourself to the list of participants, if you like. Also add anything to the list of things to do or work on any of the projects you would like. Thanks again! --best, kevin 08:53, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- I'm glad you could join us. Welcome! If you need anything, feel free to ask. --best, kevin 06:15, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
Economist
Think the list of economists should be alphabetized by last name instead of first?
Also, you might want to have a look at Microeconomics. It's a mess—desperately in need of an overhaul. dbtfz 08:00, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Let me know if you need some help with Microeconomics. I don't have any real expertise on the topic, but I'm interested. dbtfz 08:40, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
JEL classifications
Are you the same radek who comments at Crooked Timber. In any case, you seem well-informed, so I thought I'd pitch this idea at you. I think there's a good case for adopting the JEL classification system to define categories in economics. I'm not sure, though, how to implement this, or even how to go about getting some sort of consensus. Any ideas? JQ 09:50, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
- HI. I've run into some minor problems with this. We need a Category:Accounting for the subfield of economics. But some people want to delete it and make it Category:Accountancy which I think is silly. If you agree, maybe you could join the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 August 19.
Welcome
since nobody else did it, welcome to Misplaced Pages, thanks for reverting the vandalism on the Macroeconomics page, it's much appreciated --«Θ» zeerus 18:11, 29 March 2006 (UTC)