Misplaced Pages

:Deletion review/Log/2006 August 16: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Deletion review | Log Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:07, 21 August 2006 editXoloz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users16,915 edits →[]: closing (del. endorsed)← Previous edit Revision as of 16:13, 21 August 2006 edit undoXoloz (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users16,915 edits →[]: closing (del. endorsed)Next edit →
Line 15: Line 15:




====]====
The reason for deletion is: ''it is an article about a person or group of people that does not assert the importance or significance of the subject.''


But there was no deletion discussion page, and most of porn stars have their article, so why delete this? or why not delete all other porn stars articles? {{unsigned|201.211.68.206}} of 16.08.06
*It is always helpful if one signs. And, all porn stars are not notable to conform to ]. --] 08:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
*Does she meet the proposed guideline ] (or even come close)? If so she should be undeleted, if not there is no reason to. ] 17:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
*IMDB (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1163310/) has 33 films listed for her (I'll spare you the titles) and their porn listings are often very incomplete, so she might qualify. It's possible that the original article was a substub, like "Shelby Belle is a porn star. She's really hot." Wouldn't be the first time an article like that got speedied. ] 18:52, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Endorse deletion''': The content was as follows: "'''Shelby Belle''' (born ], ] in ], ], ]) is a porn star. She has also been credited as '''Shelby Bell'''." The fact that it's a single line (plus, of course, of course, of course, '''''of course''''' a box) makes it a perfect G1 speedy delete. X is Y = Shelby Belle is a porn star. When there is content, it can be considered by AfD and measured against guidelines. ] 20:57, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
:*OK, I was close. IMO the hotness would have been better than the Montrealness. ] 20:00, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
:*I'm sometimes reminded of the ] parody of ]: "It's a fact. It's a ''Canadian'' fact." She's a porn star. She's a ''Canadian'' porn star. However, it did have a box, and at least this version of the box (unlike other porn startlet boxes) didn't list her ''blood type.'' ] 02:43, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
::*But did it have the answer to the eternal question: "''Natural bust: yes/no''" ? -- ] 03:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
::*Alas, it didn't. It gave her measurement as 34B, so, for those who have actually met a g-g-g-girl, it probably does answer the question. ] 11:27, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
:::*I looked at her site. As they appear to be a normal size and shape, it seems likely they are original equipment. ] 13:47, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
*'''Endorse deletion''' I think we should make this Geogre's Rule on DRV's. If the complaint at DRV is longer than the article itself, it's an automatic endorse. ~ ] 07:11, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


====]==== ====]====

Revision as of 16:13, 21 August 2006

< August 15 August 17 >
Full reviews may be found in this page history. For a summary, see Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Recently concluded (2006 August)

16 August 2006

Koumpounophobia

This article was created on 4 July 2006 and recently deleted by Mikkalai (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) without, near as I can tell, a CSD tag, a PROD tag or an AfD on it. Posted without comment because I think that it might be worth reviewing. -phob-#Phobia_lists may have bearing. Maybe it's completely a hoax but I did get a fair number of ghits. He has been notified. I take no position myself. ++Lar: t/c 01:13, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Overturn Hoaxes aren't speediable, neither are dicdefs. Maybe there isn't more than a dicdef to the article, but it's been on Wiktionary since 2004 without complaints. ~ trialsanderrors 00:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)