| Revision as of 14:07, 22 August 2006 editAstanhope (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers5,369 edits removed all 2005 comments for archiving← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:13, 22 August 2006 edit undoAstanhope (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers5,369 edits mv Q1 & Q2 2006 to /2006Q12archiveNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Admin Nomination == | |||
| I have nominated you for admin ].--] 23:27, 25 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :*Thank you, Brandon. After some solid feedback I've decided to withdraw my nomination and continue gaining experience as an editor. Hopefully someone will nominate me again sometime later this year. --] 02:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks for your RfA Support == | |||
| The RfA page is a rough room! Your appreciation of my "shill" joke was, in turn, appreciated by me. Thx, Adam - --] 23:19, 26 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Yeah, tell me about it. My first RFA went down in flames too. But my second one succeeded just recently :) Hang on a couple of more months, rack up 2000 edits or so and then get someone to nominate you again (you can ask me to do it and I will if you contributions look good to me). The best thing to do now is to pull your current nomination - it's a tough crowd to please. - ] 23:31, 26 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Al Franken page== | |||
| The reference was listed. It is from Mohr's autobiography and it helps frame why Franken was never elevated above feature player status, which is relevant to his ''career''.] 03:02, 28 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :The fact that he spent more seasons than anyone else on the show but was never promoted to full castmember status is an interesting and notable piece of trivia. The fact that Jay Mohr mentions a castmember giving a reason why in his book adds more weight to it. Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it's not valid. ] 05:12, 28 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thank you == | |||
| Thanks a lot for the cleanup of Hungary-related articles! ] 12:51, 31 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi again, Adam, | |||
| Thanks for your offering and for the other cleanup works. I've been thinking about which articles I should ask you to look through but I could only have made a link to ] where my more or less significant contributions are listed – and I'm glad to see the improvement of any of them. My favorite is ] (written in ], because one of its main contributors was ]) but it may be out of your interest. I'm happy to see whichever article you feel like cleaning up. | |||
| I have three questions: | |||
| *Why did you remove two links from ]? They seemed to be functioning and quite relevant, although their descriptions were not the best. | |||
| :*I think you are talking about ] and ], no? I felt like ] was self-explanatory there, and I switched ] to ] to eliminate the American English vs. the rest of the world as to what exactly ] means (as opposed to ] or ]). | |||
| ::** No; I meant these two links: . Their description could be improved but I think they could be left in.] 01:04, 7 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::***Yes, I remember now. I deleted them because I thought that they were redundant. I will put them back when I fix the page. Thanks for bringing it to my attention! --] 05:47, 7 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *In the ] article, there is a bit of misunderstanding: the whole park is not part of the ], only ], which leads to it, and ], which is only a little part of the park itself. Would you please correct these in the article? | |||
| *In the ] article: it was written "easily available from the centre" because the ] takes you there quickly. I don't know if "close to the city center" is also true because it's about one mile away (some may find it more than walking distance). | |||
| :*I will fix these things and I will be less bold/more careful in the future. Thanks for pointing the problems out to me. --] 14:50, 6 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] 14:06, 6 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==="Urban and Suburban Transit Association" or "... Transport Association"?=== | |||
| Hi, I'd like to ask for your opinion in an ESL question. There is an organization named ] and I wonder if it should be named "Urban and Suburban Transport Association" instead. Do you think the current version is all right in English or not? It seems that the Hungarian representatives use the existing name in English but newspapers like The Budapest Sun and The Budapest Times (which are partly written by native speakers of English) use "transport" in the name (see ], if you're interested in the links). Thanks in advance. ] 18:13, 15 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Thank you! If both are correct, the ultimate question is which is "]" but I see that both have very few hits in Google so it can remain as it is for me. ] 18:48, 15 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == My RFA == | |||
| Hi {{PAGENAME}}, thanks for participating in my ] discussion. Unfortunately, my fellow Wikipedians have decided at this time that I am not suitable to take on this additional responsibility, as the RfA failed with a result of 66/27/5 (71.0% support). If you voted in support of my request, '''thank you'''! If you decided to oppose me at this time, then I hope that if I do choose to reapply in the future, the effort I will make in the meantime to improve and expand my contributions to Misplaced Pages may persuade you to reconsider your position. All the best, ]<small> ] ]</small> 15:29, 2 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] and ] == | |||
| The answer is "yes" as to both! :-) I have some contacts with USCA management & alumni association, and hope to get permission to use some old photos. | |||
| I saw ] as a redlink in the ], and am working on an article right now. It's a great old place with a number of famous diners, and I ate there about a year ago. Cheers, ] 19:09, 8 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Actually, I ended up getting busy with some other projects that have to be completed before I leave on a trip tomorrow, so I did not get the Polidor article together. It sounds like you are probably more familiar with the place, so please feel free to start the article. I was going to title it ] since that is its full formal name, with "Polidor" and "Le Polidor" as redirects for common searches. I think that is what ] encourages, but I don't have a strong opinion. ] 19:34, 9 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Larry the Cable Guy / Andover == | |||
| I'm wondering about your recent additions...do you have a source? I was unable to find any stuff online, and I'd never heard that in my years at the school, and the list of alumni is pretty regularly vandalized by andover students (as well as other prep school students) to include themselves, chuck norris, or anyone else the feel would be funny. As a result, I quickly reverted the edit. I didn't touch the Larry the Cable Guy article, but I would be interested in seeing a source. --] <sup>]</sup> 11:49, 12 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Do you have a source? --] <sup>]</sup> 22:48, 14 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Dick Cheney Jokes == | |||
| Steve: Here's that link to the I mentioned at dinner. Funny stuff. I wish I was creative enough to contribute. | |||
| ==Nice Move== | |||
| Removing that democrat reference, I removed it once before, but I didn't want to get nasty about it. Seems I'm not the only one who thought it was kind of weird that it was listed in one of the opening sentences.--] 22:43, 22 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Date links == | |||
| Since you have taken an interest in date links. Please be kind enough to vote for my ]. ] 20:03, 25 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Polidor == | |||
| Finally got around to writing a short article about the ]. Please take a look. I also didn't realize until shortly before creating it that a previous article had been deleted via AfD, so I addressed that on the Talk page. Best regards, ] 23:22, 27 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Ring tone== | |||
| Sorry, I had to remove the following two links from ]: | |||
| *forty fivemovie.com/mp3/lamisc/ringtones/phone_ring_2x.mp3 | |||
| *fortyfivemo vie.com/mp3/lamisc/ringtones/euroring.mp3 | |||
| These should not be included in the external links section. Please see ]. ]]<sup>(])</sup> 20:25, 28 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Moving to ]. Let's continue discussion there. ]]<sup>(])</sup> 20:43, 28 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == What tнe ♯$*! Do ωΣ (k)πow!? == | |||
| Hello there. | |||
| I was the one who originally changed deaf to mute. I read the article right after seeing the film, and the main character is certainly not deaf. I'm not sure she's a mute either, but that's what I read on IMDB, so I guessed her speech disorder was covered by mute. I've changed it just now to read "a photographer with a speech disorder" I've written a little about it on the talk page. Just to let you know, if you eant to say why you think she's deaf. | |||
| She is not a mute, I originally wrote mute, since that's what I had read on IMDB. But I since read that a mute is one totally unable to speak. The changes I have now made is that she has a speech disorder. As I recall it, there was no indication that she had any hearing problems at all. But maybe I don't remember the movie that good, if you really feel this is so, please change it back, I won't change it again. | |||
| Your'e right, forgot about the sign language, I guess I must have thought it was because that was what she knew. I'll change it back to deaf, and add speech problem. | |||
| Hehe, thanks. You too. | |||
| == Chloe Dao == | |||
| No prob! Just doing my part. :) (]] (] • ])) 12:52, 9 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| I'll review this again in a few days, in the meantime, if you see lots of anon/newbie vandalism from multiple spots, takl page me and I'll get on it sooner. If it's the same person a block at ] would be better though. -- ] <sup>]</sup><font color="#888888">/</font><sub>]</sub> 03:30, 15 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == The TH == | |||
| I live in ]. But my heart is in ]. Take care. ] 08:34, 15 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Bangkok Article links == | |||
| I'm a DMOZ editor and a moderator on several online forums, and I understand that you have to be vigilant against spam. The site that you deleted provides destination photos organized by area and category with satellite maps. Yes, it contains ads and links to hotel reservations. In case you live in a real world and you've picked up a newspaper lately, you should understand that this is how companies that provide free information of any value can afford to do so. I'd like to ask you to check other links in the same article and count the advertisements. The value of content, which you chose to ignore, not whether the site contains advertisements should be the deciding factor. | |||
| ---- | |||
| Thanks for your suggestion. I started a new section on Bankgkok Talk page. | |||
| --] 13:51, 18 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Adam, I don't see any lively discussion or thumbs pointing either way about this link on the Bangkok Talk page. What did the khon dii collective decide? I understand that you were among the first Westerners to bring the internet to Thailand. I would like to continue this grandiose job. --] 14:34, 4 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Yet another date links proposal == | |||
| Hi, you expressed an interest in link policy in the past. You may wish to see the proposal at: ] and vote whichever way you think is best. Thanks. ] 18:29, 19 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thanks! == | |||
| You think I'm cool? *blushes and grins* - Thanks! You're cool, too! ] - 3:50, 20 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Redarding ] == | |||
| The article has been tagged for Transwiki to Wiktonary, but I'm not sure it belongs there either see . I'm taking it to ], hope you'll comment on it there. Tusen takk :). ]]]] 15:32, 22 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Thai translation == | |||
| Hi, sorry to boher you, just picked your name at random (ok your name was first :P) from ]. I can not verify the source of this image ], but there is some text there that I do not understand. Could you help me translate it and help me figure out if there is any source cited for it. The image has been copied here as ] and it simply points to the Thai Wiki... --] <span style="font-size:75%">]</span> 19:21, 1 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks for taking the trouble :) --] <span style="font-size:75%">]</span> 11:18, 2 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Astanhope. I also basically picked your name out at random from the list of users with near-fluency in Thai. I help with ], where an article in Thai has been sitting unattended. Could you please have a look at it? We really just need to know if it's appropriate for Misplaced Pages or not (notable subject, not a copyright violation, proper style, not spam, etc.). A note on the project page below the article listing would be great; we'll take things from there. Thanks so much! -] 05:07, 20 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Description of MalkinWatch == | |||
| Hi. We've both just edited the description of MalkinWatch in the ] article. The last few descriptions we've had were: | |||
| # "a blog which comments on Malkin established by 'Auguste' in December 2004" | |||
| # "an anti-Malkin blog" | |||
| # "a blog providing critical analysis of Malkin's work" | |||
| # "a blog devoted to criticising Malkin" | |||
| I contend that description #1 leaves out the important aspect of the blog while giving irrelevant details, #2 (mine) is true but overly terse, and #4 (also mine) is accurate but still a bit too terse. | |||
| I've looked for some "critical ''analysis'' of Malkin's work" at MalkinWatch but all I found were hostile ''arguments'' and snark; hence my change to #4. Can you point me to any ]al analysis on the blog? Comments welcome (here will do, I've autowatched this page), as are edits. Cheers, ]<small>]</small> 16:00, 29 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :*Thanks for writing Chris. I would be happy with your #4 description above - "a blog devoted to criticising Malkin." "anti-Malkin" really is simply too terse. The site in question maintains a standard of decency, as far as I can tell, that trancends simply shitting on Malkin or calling her "slant-eyed," or "cunt." I have seen instances, in fact, where commenters have been warned or banned there for simply making fun of her maiden name. If you are happy with describing it as #4 then we're all set. If you poke around that blog long enough, you'll even see occasional praise for or at a minimum, concurrence with Malkin. --] 19:33, 29 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Yeah, they handled the address-details spamming very well (as did most "left" websites). So #2 is ''not'' true, is it? Hmm. "a blog ''mostly'' devoted to criticising Malkin". I think I'll go with that. Cheers, ]<small>]</small> 08:11, 30 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :::I don't think you're maintaining your NPOV. An Aussie with an American political agenda. Yay! --] 20:09, 30 April 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::::] | |||
| ::::Actually, I've spent quite a bit of time over the last decade or so trying to understand American politics — not just in obvious things like foreign policy, but also in areas like intellectual property laws, corporate law reform, farm policy, etc. Short summary of my results so far: American politics works poorly, ] is far better. Is that POV enough? ;-) | |||
| ::::More seriously, the U.S. system is a form of ]: legislative issues that don't attract public attention are often overly influenced by lobbyists. Bloggers such as Malkin, Kos, etc frequently attempt to increase public awareness of specific issues in order to overcome lobbyist pressure. (You could even argue that Kos is a kind of lobbyist himself.) My favourite examples: ] (a conscious effort to change the way politics is practiced), and the bipartisan blogosphere action which prevented blogs counting as campaign contributions. | |||
| ::::So I think (hope?) blogs ''are'' important. They could/should be the solution to a significant problem of non-transparency in U.S. political practice. | |||
| ::::Cheers, ]<small>]</small> 12:59, 1 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Narragansett Beer Company== | |||
| Hi Adam. I don't know if I'll "take it on", that sounds like a little bit too much ownership/responsibility for me :) j/k but I'll be happy to add it to my watchlist and edit/add as I can, no rush is there? I started to add to the history. I am a newbie so I don't want to plagerize/copyright infringe TOO much :). Do you know how that works and how footnotes/referrences should be used. I slashed/tweaked the article from http://www.breweriana.com/history/historygansett.html which was also on this Web site http://www.narragansettbeer.net/ | |||
| Anyways lets just plug away at it and see what happens. Cheers!] 17:47, 2 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == sProtect Ted Kennedy == | |||
| Well, you seem to have me confused with someone else. I am no admin yet, although maybe at some point :). I will however bring it up with some that I know. :). Happy Editing. ] 02:07, 29 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Indeed, I am flattered that you thought so tho, even if it was because of formatting :). Anyhow, I'm not sure what the resolution is, have you brought sProtecting up on the talk page? ] 02:18, 29 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == 3RR == | |||
| Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages under the ], which states that nobody may ] an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the ''effect'' of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> | |||
| :PS: Even when you're right you still shouldn't revert more than 3 times in a day. Please discuss this on the article talk page. -] 23:11, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Cool - thanks for reminding me! --] 23:18, 6 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Allah is in the House == | |||
| I am puzzled as to why you renominated ] for deletion at this point. The article has hardly been touched since the result of the first debate was '''keep''', and Allahpundit (the author) has only risen in notability since the debate as the main blogger at Michelle Malkin's Hot Air. As stated in ]: | |||
| :If and when you do renominate, be careful to say why you think the reasons proffered for keeping the article are poor, and why you think the article must be deleted. | |||
| So far, this has not been done. ] 21:38, 7 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :My bad - a mistake on my part. I *did* nominate it - and then I saw that it had just finished a cycle with a KEEP result. I intended to go back and remove the nomination tag and forgot to do so. You are absolutely correct - there is no reason to renominate once it passed muster through that process. Sloppiness on my part for not cleaning up after myself. I'll fix it now if nobody has already fixed it. Thanks for pointing it out to me! --] 21:41, 7 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Reducing unnecessary links == | |||
| Just to let you know, I created a tool to reduce unnecessary date links. You are welcome to use it. Simply copy the entire contents of ] to ]. Then follow the instructions in your monobook to clear the cache (i.e. press Ctrl-Shift-R in Firefox, or Ctrl-F5 in IE) before it will work. This will give you a 'Dates' tab to press in edit mode. Regards. ] 16:27, 16 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re:RFA == | |||
| You want the short 'I'll have a quick look, which is likely to miss things' version which I can probably do within a day or two, or the full ] version, which has a waiting list? ] 19:25, 22 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : Ok, well the main thing that hits me looking through your contributions is not the relatively low number of edits (I have far lower standards on that count than AA below), but rather the lack of edits in the 'admin things'. Before submitting an ] you need to show that you have more experience in the sort of areas admins work in. That includes links like ], ], and lots of other maintenance type things. These are generally pages that start with Misplaced Pages: (the Misplaced Pages namespace). People also look for talk (both article and user) page interaction, knowledge of ] as well as many other things. You can take a look at my personal ] for a guide, as well as other people's at ] (please note that a lot of people seem to type lower edit counts on that page then they actually keep to, i.e generally 2000+ is more realistic than some the lower numbers on that page). Personally I dislike high edit count requirements, especially as people in work tend to have less free time for things like Misplaced Pages. However, you still need to show a wide experience of different areas of the site and admin type things. Hope that helps, feel free to ask me any other questions. ] 21:17, 23 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Restoring links on Kennedy page== | |||
| I acknowledged your apology on my page, then went back and looked - it wasn't even you who took them out. It was an administrator whose only contribution to the article was to remove the links. Weird. So ....You're still great!] 20:57, 22 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==RFA Criteria== | |||
| 4500 is the total edit minimum. While 350 is the minimum for edits to pages in the Misplaced Pages Namespace. I'm sorry for the confusion I caused. Take care. <font color="green">]</font><font color="sienna">]</font> 08:51, 23 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Changes at ]== | ==Changes at ]== | ||
| Hello, we changed the settings for the Cal userbox to allow you to personalize the text. Please check out the ] for more info. ~ ] 21:24, 17 July 2006 (UTC) | Hello, we changed the settings for the Cal userbox to allow you to personalize the text. Please check out the ] for more info. ~ ] 21:24, 17 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:13, 22 August 2006
Changes at Template:User cal
Hello, we changed the settings for the Cal userbox to allow you to personalize the text. Please check out the talk page for more info. ~ trialsanderrors 21:24, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Michelle Malkin = uniformed Nazi?!
Hi. Have you visited http://malkinwatch.blogsome.com in the last couple of months? Did you notice that the blog's logo depicts Malkin as a uniformed Nazi? (And you called me childish!) Did not notice the stream of unsubstantiated, damaging slurs on her character? Have you read WP:EL? Have you read WP:BLP? Can you find any recent post on the blog that criticises Malkin without insulting her?
Yes, we did once agree that malkinwatch was worth linking to. But the blog went downhill a few months ago, about the time Malkin switched from textblogging to video-blogging. (The bloggers seem to have tried to lift their standards a little in the last few days, but they're still near the bottom of the gutter.)
If you want malkinwatch in the article, you will need to first convince people that several sections of WP:EL should be ignored and that parts of WP:BLP should be rewritten. Barring that, I'll keep removing the link.
CWC(talk) 11:02, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Chris... What then can we choose as the definitive blog dedicated to criticizing her? I've already removed "MichelleMalkinisanIdiot.com." Perhaps relevant is the fact that part of the Malkin shtick seems to be posting unflattering photos of people she disapproves of - see any Malkin post on Cynthia McKinney or Cindy Sheehan. The link remains. --AStanhope 11:11, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- See the first paragraph in this section? It's not there for decoration. Before you restore that link again, please answer the questions I asked above.
- And why on earth do we need any blogs that criticise her? If we had a blog that satisfied WP:EL and WP:BLP, then we'd link to it. Since we don't, we simply don't link to any blogs. CWC(talk) 11:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Your edit comment
- remarkable that one might be offended by a cartoon of someone wearing a swastika armband but feel nothing in the face of that same person advocating mass race-based incarceration
- strikes me as a pathetic attempt to dodge the issue. I have repeatedly pointed out that linking to MalkinWatch violates Misplaced Pages policy as well as the WP:EL guidelines, and you have never even tried to deny that. Why are you defying Misplaced Pages's rules?
- Your edit comment
Who vandalizes Michelle Malkin
Putting aside our differences over malkinwatch, I was saddened to see you assume that this vandal came from the liberal side of politics. I think it more probable that these "misogynistic/racist slurs" come from misogynistic, racist far-right people, who would see doing "great damage to the liberal position as a whole" as highly desireable. There are some self-professed liberals who have written stupid things about Malkin (and others), but I believe that most of the racist/sexist garbage comes from Nazi-oids trying to cosy up to liberals and left-wingers through common hatred, and I am happy to see that almost everyone on the left rejects them immediately. Cheers, CWC(talk) 02:58, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- That person's comments really upset me. "Can't we all just get along?" Oh well! Thanks for the note. --AStanhope 03:01, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Michelle Malkin advertising blog links
Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Misplaced Pages, as you did in Michelle Malkin. Misplaced Pages is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links as long as the content abides by our policies and guidelines. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.
Since the blog has a stated objective of getting on Misplaced Pages, it's adcruft. It's use explicitly violates WP:EL, WP:BLP and WP:NN. Criticism of living persons needs to come from reliable sources and blogs simply do not qualify. --Tbeatty 18:54, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Claude Vermette
You do yourself injury by passive-agressively pursuing this vendetta. If you insist, you can list the article on your userpage as one you started, though that does put your record of honesty in jeopardy seeing as the edit history belies this. Also note that I've nominated your recreation of Interweb medley for speedy deletion. Recreating deleted pages, no matter the content, is... well, I'm just kind of astonished that I need to tell another experienced editor that it's not done. — Saxifrage ✎ 01:30, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- I don't know what you are talking about. Is it possible that you have me confused with somebody else? --AStanhope 18:38, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- That's next to impossible here. You must be taking all this very personally to respond like that. I'm sorry that this has distressed you so. From your edit history you seem to be a good editor and a positive influence at Misplaced Pages—please try to put this behind you and not let it affect the quality of your participation at Misplaced Pages. You might find that the essay No angry mastodons offers some good insights and perspective that would help. — Saxifrage ✎ 20:09, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- I don't know what you are talking about. Is it possible that you have me confused with somebody else? --AStanhope 18:38, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
That was very, very gracious. Thanks. I'm going to think on what you wrote a bit before giving a better reply. — Saxifrage ✎ 01:47, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Kingston, MA
Regardless of any historical importance of Kingston and Plymouth to American culture, calling it "the Cradle of American Civilization" is POV, and in any case, it's irrelevant to Neil Cicierega. That's why I removed it. —Adam Atlas 02:33, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Islamic Barnstar Award
Comment moved from your user page -- Gogo Dodo 02:35, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for the compliment. I wish everyone agreed with you. There's a change that the image will be changed. --JuanMuslim 02:30, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 12:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC)