Misplaced Pages

User talk:TruthbringerToronto/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:TruthbringerToronto Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:18, 22 August 2006 editTruthbringerToronto (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,618 edits recreated user talk page following move of old one to /Archive_1← Previous edit Revision as of 18:19, 22 August 2006 edit undoRentaferret (talk | contribs)9,611 edits Alternatives to speedyNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
| ] ] | ] ]
|} |}

== Alternatives to speedy ==

Thanks for the note. Points taken, but I'm not getting articles written that I'd ''like'' to write because I'm forever trying to "save" bad articles. (For example, I spent roughly 7 hours working on ] yesterday because the article lacked any substantial references and most likely was in danger of being nominated for deletion.) The only reason I knew about these short "less-than-stubs" (in my opinion) articles was that they were being wikilinked to pages that I monitor fairly closely (although I found a few other edits that needed to be made when I was reverting the links). I see that some of the speedy nom's were deleted, some nominated for deletion. If the administrator reviewing the speedy tag disagrees with my placing it, they have the authority to change the tag. Thanks.<font color="FF6600">&mdash;</font>]&nbsp;]&nbsp; 18:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:19, 22 August 2006

This is a subpage of TruthbringerToronto's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
Archive

Archives

1 2

Alternatives to speedy

Thanks for the note. Points taken, but I'm not getting articles written that I'd like to write because I'm forever trying to "save" bad articles. (For example, I spent roughly 7 hours working on Billy Brandt yesterday because the article lacked any substantial references and most likely was in danger of being nominated for deletion.) The only reason I knew about these short "less-than-stubs" (in my opinion) articles was that they were being wikilinked to pages that I monitor fairly closely (although I found a few other edits that needed to be made when I was reverting the links). I see that some of the speedy nom's were deleted, some nominated for deletion. If the administrator reviewing the speedy tag disagrees with my placing it, they have the authority to change the tag. Thanks.—Chidom   18:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC)