Revision as of 22:05, 22 August 2006 editRoute 82 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,537 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Revision as of 22:07, 22 August 2006 edit undoRoute 82 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,537 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → |
Line 2: |
Line 2: |
|
'''Interstate 895''' was a planned 6.4-mile-long ] in ] that would have provided a ] between ] near ] and ] near ], ]. This would have completed the partial ] around ] formed by I-95 and I-295. The roadway would also have provided additional capacity crossing the ] near the site of the ]. The new crossing was intended to be toll free. |
|
'''Interstate 895''' was a planned 6.4-mile-long ] in ] that would have provided a ] between ] near ] and ] near ], ]. This would have completed the partial ] around ] formed by I-95 and I-295. The roadway would also have provided additional capacity crossing the ] near the site of the ]. The new crossing was intended to be toll free. |
|
|
|
|
|
The proposed six lane freeway was meant to have two mainline interchanges (] & ]), and the terminus interchanges with ] & ] at a new Exit 45. Giving the freeway four total interchanges from start to finish. Once the freeway met ], there were plans to extend it as the ] freeway towards ] where it would meet the existing Route 72 at ]. |
|
The proposed six lane freeway was meant to have two mainline interchanges (] & ]), and the terminus interchanges with ] & ] at a new Exit 46. Giving the freeway four total interchanges from start to finish. Once the freeway met ], there were plans to extend it as the ] freeway towards ] where it would meet the existing Route 72 at ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
==Proposed Interchanges== |
|
==Proposed Interchanges== |
Line 8: |
Line 8: |
|
*'''Exit 5 - ]''' |
|
*'''Exit 5 - ]''' |
|
*'''Exit 2 - ]''' |
|
*'''Exit 2 - ]''' |
|
*'''Exit 0 - ]''' at a new Exit 45 |
|
*'''Exit 0 - ]''' at a new Exit 46 |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
] |