Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
Would it be appropriate to add to the page that there is a version released to Radio Disney that has altered lyrics, and then add the before and after altered lyrics? Thanks. ] ] 17:38, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
:If it's reliably sourced it would be notable, though I think stating which lyrics were altered would be unnecessary. - ] ] 17:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
::{{tps}}Reliable sources alone do not establish notability. See for more. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 20:38, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
:::The fact the song had to have its lyrics altered for a release on a major radio station in the US is a notable enough inclusion if reliably sourced, is it not? - ] ] 20:57, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
::::{{ping|User:Lips Are Movin}} Thank you for your help.
::::{{ping|User:Winkelvi}} How am I being a page stalker? ] ] 13:11, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
:::::TPS is indicating to the userspace inhabitant that I am responding because the page is on my watchlist or I noticed the discussion. It's not saying you are a TPS. Lips, you seem to have a misconception regarding what makes for notability in relation to articles and content. Please read ] to get a clearer picture. One or two reliable source mentions may not give that content the notability required for inclusion. -- <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 17:23, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
::::::I think you maybe misinterpreted what I meant with "If it's reliably sourced it would be notable". I definitely did not mean just anything could be included if it's sourced, but in ILCM's case, the info he/she wants to include is indeed notable. I am familiar with ], but a reminder is of course never harmless so ty for the tip! - ] ] 17:57, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
== Thanks ==
== Thanks ==
Revision as of 12:51, 31 March 2016
If I have left you a message: please answer on my talk page, else inform me. If you leave me a message: I will answer on your talk page, unless you request otherwise.
Please click here to leave me a new message.
Thanks. I felt very much guilty and embarrassed reading back on the personal attacks I made. A learning experience. - Lips05:28, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Be encouraged
I haven't taken a look at any of your contributions or edits but noticed your post in the Teahouse. Can I just say that I was/am exactly in the same place. Please, please don't stop editing. Please know that almost all serious editors want to see you succeed and prosper, making good contributions to the encyclopedia. You are welcome to visit me on my own talk page for the whole story; I even have been blocked and have had two very terrible discussions posted for all to see on the ANI (adminstrator's notice board incident)about me. If it makes you feel even a little bit better, you won't have any trouble recognizing one of your detractors from the Teahouse make some pretty negative remarks about me. You are also welcome to email me, the link will appear in the left hand column on my talk page. Best Regards,
Thanks for the words of encouragement. I've had a bit of breather, apologized for my behavior and sorted my issues out. It's been a bit of learning experience for me, something all inexperienced editors have to go through I guess. -Lips18:49, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
There's no rush
Obviously, you are having problems with posting. Why not just wait to comment until you are at a computer that won't cause glitchy-problems, rather than creating more history than necessary at the Trainor talk page with deleting the errors caused by your mobile device. There's no rush, and no deadline in Misplaced Pages, so don't worry about it right now. Okay? -- WV ● ✉✓17:06, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Okay thanks, will do. I'll be able to do replies tomorrow afternoon if I have spare time at work. I still think archiving two or three of the other older discussions from 3/4 months ago wouldn't do any harm. -Lips17:10, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I guess I didn't understand that it was past discussions you wanted archived, I thought you were wanting the current discussions archived. I will look into it and see if it's too soon to archive the past discussions. But, on that note, I have to say that to do it just for one user who is having computer issues would probably be considered a bit unorthodox. -- WV ● ✉✓17:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
WP:ARCHIVE says The talk page guidelines suggest archiving when the talk page exceeds 75 KB (or 75,000 bytes), or has multiple resolved or stale discussions. The talk page is on 114,000 bytes+, a lot of the relevant issues in older discussions were resolved. I know it's a bit selfish and demanding of me to ask, but I don't want my access problems to drag out the BRD process for everyone. I know both me and BBMC are keen to move through it as swiftly as possible. Thanks for the consideration. -Lips18:02, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello Lips. Haven't heard from you in a while. Just so you know, I've added your name to this linked page to due inactivity. Remember to remove yourself from the list if you ever come back. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:56, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
This is amazing. I can't post it in mainspace, because that would be like stealing the attribution from you. But you should totally do. Please return. We MISS you.--MaranoFan (talk) 10:15, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
@MaranoFan: Hey there, it's been ages. I'm trying to return actually. I'm going to try find time to finish it off this week and add it to the mainspace. Nice to see you're back! Lips12:38, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
