| Revision as of 00:27, 30 March 2016 editNiteshift36 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers41,775 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:01, 1 April 2016 edit undoFelsic2 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,178 edits →Discretionary sanctions: new sectionTag: contentious topics alertNext edit → | ||
| Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
| :*I'm not sure if I want to dive into that article or not. It really doesn't have good sourcing and I'm not sure that there is a significant level of third party coverage. And yea, I like the asterisk thing....makes it clear that a new response is starting. ] (]) 02:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC) | :*I'm not sure if I want to dive into that article or not. It really doesn't have good sourcing and I'm not sure that there is a significant level of third party coverage. And yea, I like the asterisk thing....makes it clear that a new response is starting. ] (]) 02:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :::Well, you can always just throw a couple of ] on it and see what happens. Anyways, up to you. ttfn - '']'' 03:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC) | :::Well, you can always just throw a couple of ] on it and see what happens. Anyways, up to you. ttfn - '']'' 03:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC) | ||
| == Discretionary sanctions == | |||
| {{Ivm|2='''Please carefully read this information:''' | |||
| The Arbitration Committee has authorised ] to be used for pages regarding governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is ]. | |||
| Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means ] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the ], our ], or relevant ]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as ], ], or ]. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. | |||
| This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ] (]) 00:01, 1 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:01, 1 April 2016
I detest stalkers, especially those who can't get their facts straight.
Corkscrew store photo
that would be incredibly cool —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timothyapetty (talk • contribs) 01:13, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Portal:Gang
I noticed that you been editing the Gang article . I just created a Portal (Portal:Gang) I need your help. If you have time, Can you help add some content to my portal. I would appreciate it, Thanks.--Zink Dawg -- 06:44, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Prod on David M. Malone
Drmies has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!
Wikiwings
|
Wikiwings | |
| For extraordinary contributions to Aircraft in fiction, thus improving hundreds of aircraft type articles along the way! - Ahunt (talk) 15:19, 5 February 2010 (UTC) |
Barnstar
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
| The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar may be awarded to those that show a pattern of going the extra mile to be nice, without being asked.
This barnstar is awarded to User:Niteshift36, for his dedication to compromise and his ability to work with other editors to come up with amicable solutions which satisfy everyone. Thank you for your valiant efforts to the project. Ikip (talk) 02:59, 12 September 2009 (UTC) |
Re: Our earlier disputes
Hello, I'd like to formally apologize for any hurt feelings I may have caused, on the stormfront (website) page. I think we all have heated opinions about this, but I look forward to working with you to make a better article for everyone. Cheers :) Mr. Kent (talk) 23:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC) has given you a dove! Doves promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!
Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
A beer for you!
|
No worries, Niteshift--I was happy to back you up there (that was easy anyway, since you were right). Man, some people need to get out more, so they don't have so many words left when they get here. Cheers! Drmies (talk) 22:48, 6 December 2011 (UTC) |
Peace
~ Kimelea (talk) has given you a dove! Doves promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!
Spread the peace of doves by adding {{subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
Thank you, fine by me. Let's move on. ~ Kimelea (talk) 21:12, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
|
|
Just from another editor who works on Florida articles. ...William 00:01, 19 May 2012 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| You are courageous. MONGO 03:19, 24 October 2012 (UTC) |
A beer for you!
|
|
More beer! Drmies (talk) 05:18, 9 November 2012 (UTC) |
- Who doesn't love free beer. :) Niteshift36 (talk) 16:29, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- Tell you what, I had the opposite happen tonight. Old neighbor comes by, there's a bottle of champagne, she and Mrs. Drmies claim to be tired etc; by the time they're gone and I'm thinking about finishing that bottle, it's empty after all. Plus they were disrespecting the Clint Eastwood movie I was watching, tsk tsk. Also, I made a promise: to not respond at ANI. Hey, we're all buddy-buddy now, with all this stuff going on, but weren't we in a fight a couple of months ago? Where you were wrong, of course. Later! Drmies (talk) 05:34, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Teamwork Barnstar |
| For working with me on Dave Aronberg article. You've supported him, I was dead set against his most recent bid for office, but we worked together to make the article encyclopedic rather than looking like a press release. ...William 17:45, 9 November 2012 (UTC) |
PC reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Misplaced Pages:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
- Misplaced Pages:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Misplaced Pages:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:15, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Hi, Niteshift - i have a problem and could use your help. My husband is Kermit Alexander and we have been trying to update his page to be more relevant and approachable. All the edits I have been making seem to become undone. Pictures from our personal files seem to be deleted. I am so technically challenged so I become frustrated after reading hours and hours of how-tos just to be dismissed. So how can you and I become friends that you will contribute to Kermit Alexander's? He worked really hard to become an author and now I'm stumpted on how to tell the world about his efforts. Hanna33 (talk) 23:20, 29 December 2015 (UTC) |
SEASPRAY
Just wondering what your plans are with the SEASPRAY page. I'm happy to help out if you'd like. (also, you know that when you add an asterisk ' * ' along with a colon ' : ' to your talk page entries, it creates a double indent, right? It's freakin' me out! Just sayin'... (jk)) - WOLFchild 02:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if I want to dive into that article or not. It really doesn't have good sourcing and I'm not sure that there is a significant level of third party coverage. And yea, I like the asterisk thing....makes it clear that a new response is starting. Niteshift36 (talk) 02:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
- Well, you can always just throw a couple of tags on it and see what happens. Anyways, up to you. ttfn - WOLFchild 03:18, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.