Revision as of 03:27, 19 August 2006 editMuéro (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,386 edits Quality . . .← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:20, 23 August 2006 edit undoMuéro (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,386 edits Comments about the unsouced tagNext edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Quality== | ==Quality== | ||
I don't know how this article received a rating of GA-class. Although there is a whole lot of information, I would say this article is not very good at all, and should probably be marked with the '''cleanup''', '''NPOV''', ''and'' '''unreferenced''' tags. There are entire paragraphs that need to be removed. I'm not sure if it's appropriate to override another user's assessment, especially when the assessment is just two days old, and also when it was done by such a prestigious user (]), so I will leave the rating alone and start editing the article to improve it. I encourage all editors to help me with this article. --] 03:27, 19 August 2006 (UTC) | I don't know how this article received a rating of GA-class. Although there is a whole lot of information, I would say this article is not very good at all, and should probably be marked with the '''cleanup''', '''NPOV''', ''and'' '''unreferenced''' tags. There are entire paragraphs that need to be removed. I'm not sure if it's appropriate to override another user's assessment, especially when the assessment is just two days old, and also when it was done by such a prestigious user (]), so I will leave the rating alone and start editing the article to improve it. I encourage all editors to help me with this article. --] 03:27, 19 August 2006 (UTC) | ||
:There are ''numerous'' statements in this article that need sources, so I added the '''unsourced''' tag. Once again, although I am planning on working on it myself, any help would be appreciated. --] 17:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:20, 23 August 2006
Biography GA‑class | |||||||
|
Ice Hockey Unassessed | |||||||
|
Quality
I don't know how this article received a rating of GA-class. Although there is a whole lot of information, I would say this article is not very good at all, and should probably be marked with the cleanup, NPOV, and unreferenced tags. There are entire paragraphs that need to be removed. I'm not sure if it's appropriate to override another user's assessment, especially when the assessment is just two days old, and also when it was done by such a prestigious user (User:Plange), so I will leave the rating alone and start editing the article to improve it. I encourage all editors to help me with this article. --Muéro 03:27, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
- There are numerous statements in this article that need sources, so I added the unsourced tag. Once again, although I am planning on working on it myself, any help would be appreciated. --Muéro 17:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)