| Revision as of 04:03, 1 November 2004 editUngtss (talk | contribs)6,685 edits →PROPOSAL← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:57, 1 November 2004 edit undoRednblu (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,620 edits We should open the discussion on the Creationism page, right?Next edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| : that about sums it up, i think:). any thoughts about how to resolve the issue? ] 04:03, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC) | : that about sums it up, i think:). any thoughts about how to resolve the issue? ] 04:03, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC) | ||
| :: I suggest that we open the discussion on the ] page where the master ToDo list is discussed and maintained. ] is the highest level page in this series. I'll open the question--if you did not already open it there. ;) ---] | ] 05:57, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:57, 1 November 2004
- 1) posting both places because i want to make sure somebody besides you hears this. summary on the page, fine -- whatever -- have your happyfuntime (although i think that the controversy is not pertinent to the discussion, as CREATIONISTS do not ascribe to mr cheesedreams pet interpretation of the text -- but whatever -- as long as there's equal time, i'm cool). i would like to ask for a vote, however, on whether to change the title of the article to account(s). Thoughts? Ungtss 23:12, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I HEARBY APOLOGIZE FOR RESPONDING TO CHEESEDREAM'S INCIVILITY WITH INCIVILITY OF MY OWN. please forgive my error. Ungtss 23:12, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
PROPOSAL
i would like to change the name of this article to "Creation account(s) in Genesis," because there is a dispute as to whether there is one more more accounts in the text. I would also like to replace the text in this article with the text in Creation account(s) in Genesis, which describes both POVs with regard to the text in a more evenhanded, NPOV fashion. Any thoughts? Ungtss 23:56, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
alright. any opinions, cheesedreams? Ungtss 00:45, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC) the new article, incidentally, is a thorough edit of the old one, and not a new article. i copied, pasted, and edited.
- You should either (a) edit the original article, or (b) copy paste and edit in your sandbox and append the page to your user page for discussion, linking from the talk page of the original article.
- This is the article, not your page, and the neutrality of this article is all I am willing to discuss. If you dispute the neutrality of this article, then either change it, or complain in this talk page.
- I am probably not the only person with any kind of interest in this proposed title change, and you should wait 48 hours at least to see if anyone who lives in another timezone, or is out tonight, or something, makes comment. CheeseDreams 00:54, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
---
Let's see. :) The problem seems to be that the page title "Creation accounts in Genesis" implies the POV that there are two different accounts in Genesis. And some people say that there is only ONE account in Genesis. Is that right? ---Rednblu | Talk 01:11, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- that about sums it up, i think:). any thoughts about how to resolve the issue? Ungtss 04:03, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- I suggest that we open the discussion on the Creationism page where the master ToDo list is discussed and maintained. Creationism is the highest level page in this series. I'll open the question--if you did not already open it there. ;) ---Rednblu | Talk 05:57, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)