User talk:Spartacus!: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 06:27, 22 April 2016 editKautilya3 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,448 edits →ARBIPA sanctions alert: new sectionTag: contentious topics alert ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:11, 22 April 2016 edit undoMy very best wishes (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users56,388 edits →Re Next edit →
Line 38:		Line 38:
	Replying since you mentioned me on another talk page... I think you should respond to statement by SheriffIsInTown on ] where he complained about you. I can see some problems with his statement and diffs on AE. He presented you as an edit warrior, however I thought you made some of these edits by mistake, self-reverted and asked for help on article talk page. I think your edits were not terrible, but prefer version restored by Sheriff (see ). In addition, VM reverted one of my edits, which I also do not mind. You should ''politely'' and clearly explain what you did on this page and why. I am not sure. ] (]) 20:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC)		Replying since you mentioned me on another talk page... I think you should respond to statement by SheriffIsInTown on ] where he complained about you. I can see some problems with his statement and diffs on AE. He presented you as an edit warrior, however I thought you made some of these edits by mistake, self-reverted and asked for help on article talk page. I think your edits were not terrible, but prefer version restored by Sheriff (see ). In addition, VM reverted one of my edits, which I also do not mind. You should ''politely'' and clearly explain what you did on this page and why. I am not sure. ] (]) 20:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
	:More important, you made a strong statement about certain contributors. Now, since SheriffIsInTown reported you on ], you should either apologize if you think you were wrong or provide some ''diffs'' to justify that your statement was correct. For example, "user A edit war on page X (a series of diffs), page Y (a series of diffs)", etc. Actually, I think some users edit war on these pages for months, but you should provide diffs that are preferably not older than one week. You are in a difficult position because you said that it was not just one user A, but also users B and C. Read instruction: there should be no more that 500 words and 20 diffs in your response. ] (]) 20:46, 21 April 2016 (UTC)		:More important, you made a strong statement about certain contributors. Now, since SheriffIsInTown reported you on ], you should either apologize if you think you were wrong or provide some ''diffs'' to justify that your statement was correct. For example, "user A edit war on page X (a series of diffs), page Y (a series of diffs)", etc. Actually, I think some users edit war on these pages for months, but you should provide diffs that are preferably not older than one week. You are in a difficult position because you said that it was not just one user A, but also users B and C. Read instruction: there should be no more that 500 words and 20 diffs in your response. ] (]) 20:46, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
			::Please check ]. You should fix all links in your statement and make it more concise and clear. It should go like that: very brief and clear statement 1 , very brief and clear statement 2 , and so on.] (]) 16:11, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

	== ARBIPA sanctions alert ==		== ARBIPA sanctions alert ==

Revision as of 16:11, 22 April 2016

Welcome

Hello, ArghyaIndian, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page HAL Light Combat Helicopter did not conform to Misplaced Pages's verifiability policy, and have been removed or tagged. Misplaced Pages articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Misplaced Pages also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions or ask a question on your talk page. -Fnlayson (talk) 02:06, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, ArghyaIndian, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits has not conformed to Misplaced Pages's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Misplaced Pages articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Misplaced Pages also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. MBlaze Lightning -talk! 12:42, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

There is a discussion regarding you at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#ArghyaIndian. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 17:21, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Edit-warring at 1971 Bangladesh genocide

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 1971 Bangladesh genocide. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 17:42, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Re

Replying since you mentioned me on another talk page... I think you should respond to statement by SheriffIsInTown on WP:AE where he complained about you. I can see some problems with his statement and diffs on AE. He presented you as an edit warrior, however I thought you made some of these edits by mistake, self-reverted and asked for help on article talk page. I think your edits were not terrible, but prefer version restored by Sheriff (see this). In addition, VM reverted one of my edits, which I also do not mind. You should politely and clearly explain what you did on this page and why. I am not sure. My very best wishes (talk) 20:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

More important, you made a strong statement about certain contributors. Now, since SheriffIsInTown reported you on WP:AE, you should either apologize if you think you were wrong or provide some diffs to justify that your statement was correct. For example, "user A edit war on page X (a series of diffs), page Y (a series of diffs)", etc. Actually, I think some users edit war on these pages for months, but you should provide diffs that are preferably not older than one week. You are in a difficult position because you said that it was not just one user A, but also users B and C. Read instruction: there should be no more that 500 words and 20 diffs in your response. My very best wishes (talk) 20:46, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Please check WP:TLDR. You should fix all links in your statement and make it more concise and clear. It should go like that: very brief and clear statement 1 , very brief and clear statement 2 , and so on.My very best wishes (talk) 16:11, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 Kautilya3 (talk) 06:27, 22 April 2016 (UTC)